|
|
|
|
|
|
IETF RFC 9209
Last modified on Thursday, June 9th, 2022
 Permanent link to RFC 9209
 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 9209
 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 9209
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Nottingham
Request for Comments: 9209 Fastly
Category: Standards Track P. Sikora
ISSN: 2070-1721 Google
June 2022
The Proxy-Status HTTP Response Header Field
 Abstract
This document defines the Proxy-Status HTTP response field to convey
the details of an intermediary's response handling, including
generated errors.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 9209.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. Notational Conventions
2. The Proxy-Status HTTP Field
2.1. Proxy-Status Parameters
2.1.1. error
2.1.2. next-hop
2.1.3. next-protocol
2.1.4. received-status
2.1.5. details
2.2. Defining New Proxy-Status Parameters
2.3. Proxy Error Types
2.3.1. DNS Timeout
2.3.2. DNS Error
2.3.3. Destination Not Found
2.3.4. Destination Unavailable
2.3.5. Destination IP Prohibited
2.3.6. Destination IP Unroutable
2.3.7. Connection Refused
2.3.8. Connection Terminated
2.3.9. Connection Timeout
2.3.10. Connection Read Timeout
2.3.11. Connection Write Timeout
2.3.12. Connection Limit Reached
2.3.13. TLS Protocol Error
2.3.14. TLS Certificate Error
2.3.15. TLS Alert Received
2.3.16. HTTP Request Error
2.3.17. HTTP Request Denied
2.3.18. HTTP Incomplete Response
2.3.19. HTTP Response Header Section Too Large
2.3.20. HTTP Response Header Field Line Too Large
2.3.21. HTTP Response Body Too Large
2.3.22. HTTP Response Trailer Section Too Large
2.3.23. HTTP Response Trailer Field Line Too Large
2.3.24. HTTP Response Transfer-Coding Error
2.3.25. HTTP Response Content-Coding Error
2.3.26. HTTP Response Timeout
2.3.27. HTTP Upgrade Failed
2.3.28. HTTP Protocol Error
2.3.29. Proxy Internal Response
2.3.30. Proxy Internal Error
2.3.31. Proxy Configuration Error
2.3.32. Proxy Loop Detected
2.4. Defining New Proxy Error Types
3. IANA Considerations
4. Security Considerations
5. References
5.1. Normative References
5.2. Informative References
Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
HTTP intermediaries (see Section 3.7 of [HTTP]) -- including both
forward proxies and gateways (also known as "reverse proxies") --
have become an increasingly significant part of HTTP deployments. In
particular, reverse proxies and content delivery networks (CDNs) form
part of the critical infrastructure of many websites.
Typically, HTTP intermediaries forward requests towards the origin
server (inbound) and then forward their responses back to clients
(outbound). However, if an error occurs before a response is
obtained from an inbound server, the response is often generated by
the intermediary itself.
HTTP accommodates these types of errors with a few status codes --
for example, 502 (Bad Gateway) and 504 (Gateway Timeout). However,
experience has shown that more information is necessary to aid
debugging and communicate what's happened to the client.
Additionally, intermediaries sometimes want to convey additional
information about their handling of a response, even if they did not
generate it.
To enable these uses, Section 2 defines a new HTTP response field to
allow intermediaries to convey details of their handling of a
response. Section 2.1 enumerates the information that can be added
to the field by intermediaries, which can be extended per
Section 2.2. Section 2.3 defines a set of error types for use when a
proxy encounters an issue when obtaining a response for the request;
these can likewise be extended per Section 2.4.
1.1. Notational Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC 2119] [RFC 8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
This document uses the following terminology from Section 3 of
[STRUCTURED-FIELDS] to specify syntax and parsing: List, String,
Token, Integer, and Byte Sequence.
Note that in this specification, "proxy" is used to indicate both
forward and reverse proxies, otherwise known as gateways. "Next hop"
indicates the connection in the direction leading to the origin
server for the request.
2. The Proxy-Status HTTP Field
The Proxy-Status HTTP response field allows an intermediary to convey
additional information about its handling of a response and its
associated request.
Its value is a List (see Section 3.1 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]). Each
member of the List represents an intermediary that has handled the
response. The first member represents the intermediary closest to
the origin server, and the last member represents the intermediary
closest to the user agent.
For example:
Proxy-Status: revproxy1.example.net, ExampleCDN
indicates that this response was handled first by
revproxy1.example.net (a reverse proxy adjacent to the origin server)
and then ExampleCDN.
Intermediaries determine when it is appropriate to add the Proxy-
Status field to a response. Some might decide to append it to all
responses, whereas others might only do so when specifically
configured to or when the request contains a header field that
activates a debugging mode.
Each member of the List identifies the intermediary that inserted the
value and MUST have a type of either String or Token. Depending on
the deployment, this might be a service name (but not a software or
hardware product name; e.g., "ExampleCDN" is appropriate, but
"ExampleProxy" is not because it doesn't identify the deployment), a
hostname ("proxy-3.example.com"), an IP address, or a generated
string.
Parameters of each member (per Section 3.1.2 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS])
convey additional information about that intermediary's handling of
the response and its associated request; see Section 2.1. While all
of these parameters are OPTIONAL, intermediaries are encouraged to
provide as much information as possible (but see Section 4 for
security considerations in doing so).
When adding a value to the Proxy-Status field, intermediaries SHOULD
preserve the existing members of the field to allow debugging of the
entire chain of intermediaries handling the request unless explicitly
configured to remove them (e.g., to prevent internal network details
from leaking; see Section 4).
Origin servers MUST NOT generate the Proxy-Status field.
Proxy-Status MAY be sent as an HTTP trailer field. For example, if
an intermediary is streaming a response and the inbound connection
suddenly terminates, Proxy-Status can only be appended to the trailer
section of the outbound message since the header section has already
been sent. However, because it might be silently discarded along the
path to the user agent (as is the case for all trailer fields; see
Section 6.5 of [HTTP]), Proxy-Status SHOULD NOT be sent as a trailer
field unless it is not possible to send it in the header section.
To allow recipients to reconstruct the relative ordering of Proxy-
Status members conveyed in trailer fields with those conveyed in
header fields, an intermediary MUST NOT send Proxy-Status as a
trailer field unless it has also generated a Proxy-Status header
field with the same member (although potentially different
parameters) in that message.
For example, a proxy identified as 'ThisProxy' that receives a
response bearing a header field:
Proxy-Status: SomeOtherProxy
would add its own entry to the header field:
Proxy-Status: SomeOtherProxy, ThisProxy
thus allowing it to append a trailer field:
Proxy-Status: ThisProxy; error=read_timeout
which would thereby allow a downstream recipient to understand that
processing by 'SomeOtherProxy' occurred before 'ThisProxy'.
A client MAY promote the Proxy-Status trailer field into a header
field by following these steps:
1. For each member trailer_member of the Proxy-Status trailer field
value:
1. Let header_member be the first (leftmost) value of the Proxy-
Status header field value, comparing the String or Token
character by character without consideration of parameters.
2. If no matching header_member is found, continue processing
the next trailer_member.
3. Replace header_member with trailer_member in its entirety,
including any parameters.
2. Remove the Proxy-Status trailer field if empty.
2.1. Proxy-Status Parameters
This section lists parameters that can be used on the members of the
Proxy-Status field. Unrecognised parameters MUST be ignored.
2.1.1. error
The error parameter's value is a Token that is a proxy error type.
When present, it indicates that the intermediary encountered an issue
when obtaining this response.
The presence of some proxy error types indicates that the response
was generated by the intermediary itself, rather than being forwarded
from the origin server. This is the case when, for example, the
origin server can't be contacted, so the proxy has to create its own
response.
Other proxy error types can be added to (potentially partial)
responses that were generated by the origin server or some other
inbound server. For example, if the forward connection abruptly
closes, an intermediary might add Proxy-Status with an appropriate
error as a trailer field.
Proxy error types that are registered with a 'Response only generated
by intermediaries' value of 'true' indicate that they can only occur
in responses generated by the intermediary. If the value is 'false',
the response might be generated by the intermediary or an inbound
server.
Section 2.3 lists the proxy error types defined in this document; new
ones can be defined using the procedure outlined in Section 2.4.
For example:
HTTP/1.1 504 Gateway Timeout
Proxy-Status: ExampleCDN; error=connection_timeout
indicates that this 504 response was generated by ExampleCDN due to a
connection timeout when going forward.
Or:
HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Proxy-Status: r34.example.net; error=http_request_error, ExampleCDN
indicates that this 429 (Too Many Requests) response was generated by
r34.example.net, not the CDN or the origin.
When sending the error parameter, the most specific proxy error type
SHOULD be sent, provided that it accurately represents the error
condition. If an appropriate proxy error type is not defined, there
are a number of generic error types (e.g., proxy_internal_error,
http_protocol_error) that can be used. If they are not suitable,
consider registering a new proxy error type (see Section 2.4).
Each proxy error type has a recommended HTTP status code. When
generating an HTTP response containing the error, its HTTP status
code SHOULD be set to the recommended HTTP status code. However,
there may be circumstances (e.g., for backwards compatibility with
previous behaviours, a status code has already been sent) when
another status code might be used.
Proxy error types can also define any number of extra parameters for
use with that type. Their use, like all parameters, is optional. As
a result, if an extra parameter is used with a proxy error type for
which it is not defined, it will be ignored.
2.1.2. next-hop
The next-hop parameter's value is a String or Token that identifies
the intermediary or origin server selected (and used, if contacted)
to obtain this response. It might be a hostname, IP address, or
alias.
For example:
Proxy-Status: cdn.example.org; next-hop=backend.example.org:8001
indicates that cdn.example.org used backend.example.org:8001 as the
next hop for this request.
2.1.3. next-protocol
The next-protocol parameter's value indicates the Application-Layer
Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) protocol identifier [RFC 7301] of the
protocol used by the intermediary to connect to the next hop when
obtaining this response.
The value MUST be either a Token or Byte Sequence representing a TLS
ALPN Protocol ID (see <https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-
extensiontype-values#alpn-protocol-ids>). If the protocol identifier
is able to be expressed as a Token using ASCII encoding, that form
MUST be used.
For example:
Proxy-Status: "proxy.example.org"; next-protocol=h2
Note that the ALPN identifier is being used here to identify the
protocol in use; it may or may not have been actually used in the
protocol negotiation.
2.1.4. received-status
The received-status parameter's value indicates the HTTP status code
that the intermediary received from the next-hop server when
obtaining this response.
The value MUST be an Integer.
For example:
Proxy-Status: ExampleCDN; received-status=200
2.1.5. details
The details parameter's value is a String containing additional
information not captured anywhere else. This can include
implementation-specific or deployment-specific information.
For example:
Proxy-Status: proxy.example.net; error="http_protocol_error";
details="Malformed response header: space before colon"
2.2. Defining New Proxy-Status Parameters
New Proxy-Status parameters can be defined by registering them in the
"HTTP Proxy-Status Parameters" registry.
Registration requests are reviewed and approved by Expert Review, per
[RFC 8126], Section 4.5. A specification document is appreciated but
not required.
The expert(s) should consider the following factors when evaluating
requests:
* Community feedback
* If the value is sufficiently well defined
* Generic parameters are preferred over vendor-specific,
application-specific, or deployment-specific values. If a generic
value cannot be agreed upon in the community, the parameter's name
should be correspondingly specific (e.g., with a prefix that
identifies the vendor, application, or deployment).
* Parameter names should not conflict with registered extra
parameters in the "HTTP Proxy Error Types" registry.
Registration requests should use the following template:
Name: [a name for the Proxy-Status parameter that matches key]
Description: [a description of the parameter semantics and value]
Reference: [to a specification defining this parameter; optional]
See the registry at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-
status> for details on where to send registration requests.
2.3. Proxy Error Types
This section lists the proxy error types defined by this document.
See Section 2.4 for information about defining new proxy error types.
Note that implementations might not produce all proxy error types.
The set of types below is designed to map to existing states in
implementations and therefore may not be applicable to some.
2.3.1. DNS Timeout
Name: dns_timeout
Description: The intermediary encountered a timeout when trying to
find an IP address for the next-hop hostname.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 504
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.2. DNS Error
Name: dns_error
Description: The intermediary encountered a DNS error when trying to
find an IP address for the next-hop hostname.
Extra Parameters:
rcode: A String conveying the DNS RCODE that indicates the error
type. See [RFC 8499], Section 3.
info-code: An Integer conveying the Extended DNS Error Code INFO-
CODE. See [RFC 8914].
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.3. Destination Not Found
Name: destination_not_found
Description: The intermediary cannot determine the appropriate next
hop to use for this request; for example, it may not be
configured. Note that this error is specific to gateways, which
typically require specific configuration to identify the "backend"
server; forward proxies use in-band information to identify the
origin server.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 500
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.4. Destination Unavailable
Name: destination_unavailable
Description: The intermediary considers the next hop to be
unavailable; e.g., recent attempts to communicate with it may have
failed, or a health check may indicate that it is down.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 503
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.5. Destination IP Prohibited
Name: destination_ip_prohibited
Description: The intermediary is configured to prohibit connections
to the next-hop IP address.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.6. Destination IP Unroutable
Name: destination_ip_unroutable
Description: The intermediary cannot find a route to the next-hop IP
address.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.7. Connection Refused
Name: connection_refused
Description: The intermediary's connection to the next hop was
refused.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.8. Connection Terminated
Name: connection_terminated
Description: The intermediary's connection to the next hop was
closed before a complete response was received.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.9. Connection Timeout
Name: connection_timeout
Description: The intermediary's attempt to open a connection to the
next hop timed out.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 504
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.10. Connection Read Timeout
Name: connection_read_timeout
Description: The intermediary was expecting data on a connection
(e.g., part of a response) but did not receive any new data in a
configured time limit.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 504
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.11. Connection Write Timeout
Name: connection_write_timeout
Description: The intermediary was attempting to write data to a
connection but was not able to (e.g., because its buffers were
full).
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 504
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.12. Connection Limit Reached
Name: connection_limit_reached
Description: The intermediary is configured to limit the number of
connections it has to the next hop, and that limit has been
exceeded.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 503
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.13. TLS Protocol Error
Name: tls_protocol_error
Description: The intermediary encountered a TLS error when
communicating with the next hop, either during the handshake or
afterwards.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
Notes: Not appropriate when a TLS alert is received; see
tls_alert_received.
2.3.14. TLS Certificate Error
Name: tls_certificate_error
Description: The intermediary encountered an error when verifying
the certificate presented by the next hop.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.15. TLS Alert Received
Name: tls_alert_received
Description: The intermediary received a TLS alert from the next
hop.
Extra Parameters:
alert-id: An Integer containing the applicable value from the
"TLS Alerts" registry. See [TLS].
alert-message: A Token or String containing the applicable
description string from the "TLS Alerts" registry. See [TLS].
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.16. HTTP Request Error
Name: http_request_error
Description: The intermediary is generating a client (4xx) response
on the origin's behalf. Applicable status codes include (but are
not limited to) 400, 403, 405, 406, 408, 411, 413, 414, 415, 416,
417, and 429.
Extra Parameters:
status-code: An Integer containing the generated status code.
status-phrase: A String containing the generated status phrase.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: The applicable 4xx status code
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
Notes: This type helps distinguish between responses generated by
intermediaries from those generated by the origin.
2.3.17. HTTP Request Denied
Name: http_request_denied
Description: The intermediary rejected the HTTP request based on its
configuration and/or policy settings. The request wasn't
forwarded to the next hop.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 403
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.18. HTTP Incomplete Response
Name: http_response_incomplete
Description: The intermediary received an incomplete response to the
request from the next hop.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.19. HTTP Response Header Section Too Large
Name: http_response_header_section_size
Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
whose header section was considered too large.
Extra Parameters:
header-section-size: An Integer indicating how large the received
headers were. Note that they might not be complete; i.e., the
intermediary may have discarded or refused additional data.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.20. HTTP Response Header Field Line Too Large
Name: http_response_header_size
Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
containing an individual header field line that was considered too
large.
Extra Parameters:
header-name: A String indicating the name of the header field
that triggered the error.
header-size: An Integer indicating the size of the header field
that triggered the error.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.21. HTTP Response Body Too Large
Name: http_response_body_size
Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
whose body was considered too large.
Extra Parameters:
body-size: An Integer indicating how large the received body was.
Note that it may not have been complete; i.e., the intermediary
may have discarded or refused additional data.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.22. HTTP Response Trailer Section Too Large
Name: http_response_trailer_section_size
Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
whose trailer section was considered too large.
Extra Parameters:
trailer-section-size: An Integer indicating how large the
received trailers were. Note that they might not be complete;
i.e., the intermediary may have discarded or refused additional
data.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.23. HTTP Response Trailer Field Line Too Large
Name: http_response_trailer_size
Description: The intermediary received a response to the request
containing an individual trailer field line that was considered
too large.
Extra Parameters:
trailer-name: A String indicating the name of the trailer field
that triggered the error.
trailer-size: An Integer indicating the size of the trailer field
that triggered the error.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.24. HTTP Response Transfer-Coding Error
Name: http_response_transfer_coding
Description: The intermediary encountered an error decoding the
transfer coding of the response.
Extra Parameters:
coding: A Token containing the specific coding (from the "HTTP
Transfer Coding Registry") that caused the error.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.25. HTTP Response Content-Coding Error
Name: http_response_content_coding
Description: The intermediary encountered an error decoding the
content coding of the response.
Extra Parameters:
coding: A Token containing the specific coding (from the "HTTP
Content Coding Registry") that caused the error.
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.26. HTTP Response Timeout
Name: http_response_timeout
Description: The intermediary reached a configured time limit
waiting for the complete response.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 504
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.27. HTTP Upgrade Failed
Name: http_upgrade_failed
Description: The process of negotiating an upgrade of the HTTP
version between the intermediary and the next hop failed.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.28. HTTP Protocol Error
Name: http_protocol_error
Description: The intermediary encountered an HTTP protocol error
when communicating with the next hop. This error should only be
used when a more specific one is not defined.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: false
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.29. Proxy Internal Response
Name: proxy_internal_response
Description: The intermediary generated the response itself without
attempting to connect to the next hop.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: The most appropriate status code for
the response
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.30. Proxy Internal Error
Name: proxy_internal_error
Description: The intermediary encountered an internal error
unrelated to the origin.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 500
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.31. Proxy Configuration Error
Name: proxy_configuration_error
Description: The intermediary encountered an error regarding its
configuration.
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 500
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.3.32. Proxy Loop Detected
Name: proxy_loop_detected
Description: The intermediary tried to forward the request to
itself, or a loop has been detected using different means (e.g.,
[RFC 8586]).
Extra Parameters: None
Recommended HTTP Status Code: 502
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: true
Reference: RFC 9209
2.4. Defining New Proxy Error Types
New proxy error types can be defined by registering them in the "HTTP
Proxy Error Types" registry.
Registration requests are reviewed and approved by Expert Review, per
[RFC 8126], Section 4.5. A specification document is appreciated but
not required.
The expert(s) should consider the following factors when evaluating
requests:
* Community feedback
* If the value is sufficiently well-defined
* Generic types are preferred over vendor-specific, application-
specific, or deployment-specific values. If a generic value
cannot be agreed upon in the community, the type's name should be
correspondingly specific (e.g., with a prefix that identifies the
vendor, application, or deployment).
* Extra parameters should not conflict with registered Proxy-Status
parameters.
Registration requests should use the following template:
Name: [a name for the proxy error type that is of type Token]
Description: [a description of the conditions that generate the
proxy error type]
Extra Parameters: [zero or more optional parameters, along with
their allowable Structured Type(s)]
Recommended HTTP Status Code: [the appropriate HTTP status code for
this entry]
Response Only Generated by Intermediaries: ['true' or 'false']
Reference: [to a specification defining this error type; optional]
Notes: [optional]
If the proxy error type might occur in responses that are not
generated by the intermediary -- for example, when an error is
detected as the response is streamed from a forward connection,
causing a Proxy-Status trailer field to be appended -- the 'Response
only generated by intermediaries' should be 'false'. If the proxy
error type only occurs in responses that are generated by the
intermediary, it should be 'true'.
See the registry at <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-
status> for details on where to send registration requests.
3. IANA Considerations
IANA has created the "HTTP Proxy-Status Parameters" registry and the
"HTTP Proxy Error Types" registry at
<https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-status> and has
populated them with the types defined in Sections 2.1 and 2.3
respectively; see Sections 2.2 and 2.4 for their associated
procedures.
Additionally, the following entry has been added to the "Hypertext
Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Field Name Registry":
Field name: Proxy-Status
Status: permanent
Specification document(s): RFC 9209
Comments:
4. Security Considerations
One of the primary security concerns when using Proxy-Status is
leaking information that might aid an attacker. For example,
information about the intermediary's configuration and backend
topology can be exposed, allowing attackers to directly target
backend services that are not prepared for high traffic volume or
malformed inputs. Some information might only be suitable to reveal
to authorized parties.
As a result, care needs to be taken when deciding to generate a
Proxy-Status field and what information to include in it. Note that
intermediaries are not required to generate a Proxy-Status field in
any response and can conditionally generate them based upon request
attributes (e.g., authentication tokens, IP address).
Likewise, generation of all parameters is optional, as is the
generation of the field itself. Also, the field's content is not
verified; an intermediary can claim certain actions (e.g., sending a
request over an encrypted channel) but fail to actually do that.
5. References
5.1. Normative References
[HTTP] Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110,
DOI 10.17487/RFC 9110, June 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 9110>.
[RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC 2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2119>.
[RFC 7301] Friedl, S., Popov, A., Langley, A., and E. Stephan,
"Transport Layer Security (TLS) Application-Layer Protocol
Negotiation Extension", RFC 7301, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7301,
July 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7301>.
[RFC 8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8126>.
[RFC 8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8174>.
[RFC 8499] Hoffman, P., Sullivan, A., and K. Fujiwara, "DNS
Terminology", BCP 219, RFC 8499, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8499,
January 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8499>.
[RFC 8914] Kumari, W., Hunt, E., Arends, R., Hardaker, W., and D.
Lawrence, "Extended DNS Errors", RFC 8914,
DOI 10.17487/RFC 8914, October 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8914>.
[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]
Nottingham, M. and P-H. Kamp, "Structured Field Values for
HTTP", RFC 8941, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8941, March 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8941>.
[TLS] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8446>.
5.2. Informative References
[RFC 8586] Ludin, S., Nottingham, M., and N. Sullivan, "Loop
Detection in Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)", RFC 8586,
DOI 10.17487/RFC 8586, April 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8586>.
Authors' Addresses
Mark Nottingham
Fastly
Prahran
Australia
Email: mnot@mnot.net
URI: https://www.mnot.net/
Piotr Sikora
Google
Email: piotrsikora@google.com
RFC TOTAL SIZE: 36559 bytes
PUBLICATION DATE: Thursday, June 9th, 2022
LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)
|
