|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 93
Initial Connection Protocol Last modified on Monday, April 7th, 1997 Permanent link to RFC 93 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 93 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 93 Network Working Group A. McKenzie Request for Comments #93 BBN Updates RFC's 66, 80 January 1971 Initial Connection Protocol A review of the Initial Connection Protocol (ICP) first described in RFC #66 and restated in RFC #80 has revealed an area of ambiguity, which in turn reflects an ambiguity in the Host-Host Protocol Document No. 1. This is the definition of the message sent over the connection from "Server socket #1". In both referenced RFC's, the message is defined as "exactly an even 32 bit number". It is not clear, however, whether this 32 bit number is meant to follow an eight-bit "message data type" code or not, stemming from the fact that the Host-Host Protocol makes provision for such codes but does not seem to absolutely demand them. Only one implementation of an ICP has been documented in the NWG literature - that at UCSB (RFC #74). The implementers of this ICP have apparently interpreted the Host-Host Protocol as demanding a message data type code, and therefore do transmit a code of zero. Steve Crocker indicates (private communication) that the Host- Host Protocol was intended to require a message data type code. We therefore recommend that RFC numbers 66 and 80 be amended to show that the "even 32 bit number" is preceded by a message data type code of zero (zero is the only code currently defined). [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by James Thompson 4/97 ] PAGE 1 |