The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 8113   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 8113



Last modified on Friday, March 10th, 2017

Permanent link to RFC 8113
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 8113
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 8113







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                      M. Boucadair
Request for Comments: 8113                                  C. Jacquenet
Updates: 6830                                                     Orange
Category: Experimental                                      March 2017
ISSN: 2070-1721


                 Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP):
  Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations

 Abstract

   This document specifies a Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
   shared message type for defining future extensions and conducting
   experiments without consuming a LISP packet type codepoint for each
   extension.  It also defines a registry for LISP Packet Type
   allocations, thus updating RFC 6830.

 Status of This Memo

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for examination, experimental implementation, and
   evaluation.

   This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.  This document is a product of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF
   community.  It has received public review and has been approved for
   publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not
   all documents approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of
   Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8113.
















Boucadair & Jacquenet         Experimental                   PAGE 1 top


RFC 8113 LISP Packet Type Allocations March 2017 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. LISP Shared Extension Message Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.1. LISP Packet Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5.2. Sub-Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1. Introduction The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) base specification, [RFC 6830], defines a set of primitives that are identified with a packet type code. Several extensions have been proposed to add more LISP functionalities. For example, new message types are proposed in [LISP-DDT], [LISP-MN-EXT], [LISP-BULK], [NAT-LISP], or [LISP-SUBSCRIBE]. It is expected that additional LISP extensions will be proposed in the future. In order to ease the tracking of LISP message types, this document proposes to create a "LISP Packet Types" IANA registry (see Section 5). Because of the limited type space [RFC 6830] and the need to conduct experiments to assess new LISP extensions, this document specifies a shared LISP extension message type and proposes a procedure for registering LISP shared extension sub-types (see Section 3). Boucadair & Jacquenet Experimental PAGE 2 top

RFC 8113 LISP Packet Type Allocations March 2017 Concretely, one single LISP message type code is dedicated to future LISP extensions; sub-types are used to uniquely identify a given LISP extension making use of the shared LISP extension message type. These identifiers are selected by the author(s) of the corresponding LISP specification that introduces a new LISP extension message type. 2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119]. 3. LISP Shared Extension Message Type Figure 1 depicts the common format of the LISP shared extension message. The type field MUST be set to 15 (see Section 5). 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Type=15| Sub-type | extension-specific | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ // extension-specific // // // +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: LISP Shared Extension Message Type The "Sub-type" field conveys a unique identifier that MUST be registered with IANA (see Section 5.2). The exact structure of the 'extension-specific' portion of the message is specified in the corresponding specification document. 4. Security Considerations This document does not introduce any additional security issues other than those discussed in [RFC 6830]. Boucadair & Jacquenet Experimental PAGE 3 top

RFC 8113 LISP Packet Type Allocations March 2017 5. IANA Considerations 5.1. LISP Packet Types IANA has created a new protocol registry for LISP Packet Types, numbered 0-15. The registry is initially populated with the following values: Message Code Reference ================================= ==== =============== Reserved 0 [RFC 6830] LISP Map-Request 1 [RFC 6830] LISP Map-Reply 2 [RFC 6830] LISP Map-Register 3 [RFC 6830] LISP Map-Notify 4 [RFC 6830] LISP Encapsulated Control Message 8 [RFC 6830] LISP Shared Extension Message 15 [RFC 8113] The values in the ranges 5-7 and 9-14 can be assigned via Standards Action [RFC 5226]. Documents that request for a new LISP packet type may indicate a preferred value in the corresponding IANA sections. 5.2. Sub-Types IANA has created the "LISP Shared Extension Message Type Sub-types" registry. No initial values are assigned at the creation of the registry; (0-4095) are available for future assignments. The values in the range 0-1023 are assigned via Standards Action. This range is provisioned to anticipate, in particular, the exhaustion of the LISP Packet types. The values in the range 1024-4095 are assigned on a First Come, First Served (FCFS) basis. The registration procedure should provide IANA with the desired codepoint and a point of contact; providing a short description (together with an acronym, if relevant) of the foreseen usage of the extension message is also encouraged. Boucadair & Jacquenet Experimental PAGE 4 top

RFC 8113 LISP Packet Type Allocations March 2017 6. References 6.1. Normative References [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC 2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2119>. [RFC 5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, DOI 10.17487/RFC 5226, May 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 5226>. [RFC 6830] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 6830, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6830, January 2013, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6830>. 6.2. Informative References [LISP-BULK] Boucadair, M. and C. Jacquenet, "LISP Mapping Bulk Retrieval", Work in Progress, draft-boucadair-lisp-bulk-04, February 2017. [LISP-DDT] Fuller, V., Lewis, D., Ermagan, V., Jain, A., and A. Smirnov, "LISP Delegated Database Tree", Work in Progress, draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-09, January 2017. [LISP-MN-EXT] Wang, J., Meng, Y., and N. Zhao, "LISP Mobile Node extension", Work in Progress, draft-zhao-lisp-mn-extension-02, October 2011. [LISP-SUBSCRIBE] Boucadair, M. and C. Jacquenet, "LISP Subscription", Work in Progress, draft-boucadair-lisp-subscribe-04, February 2017. [NAT-LISP] Ermagan, V., Farinacci, D., Lewis, D., Skriver, J., Maino, F., and C. White, "NAT traversal for LISP", Work in Progress, draft-ermagan-lisp-nat-traversal-11, August 2016. Boucadair & Jacquenet Experimental PAGE 5 top

RFC 8113 LISP Packet Type Allocations March 2017 Acknowledgments This work is partly funded by ANR LISP-Lab project #ANR-13-INFR- 009-X. Many thanks to Luigi Iannone, Dino Farinacci, and Alvaro Retana for the review. Thanks to Geoff Huston for the RtgDir directorate review. Authors' Addresses Mohamed Boucadair Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Christian Jacquenet Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: christian.jacquenet@orange.com Boucadair & Jacquenet Experimental PAGE 6 top

RFC TOTAL SIZE: 10608 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Friday, March 10th, 2017 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 8113: The IETF Trust, Friday, March 10th, 2017
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement