The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 8089   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 8089



Last modified on Saturday, February 18th, 2017

Permanent link to RFC 8089
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 8089
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 8089







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                         M. Kerwin
Request for Comments: 8089                                           QUT
Updates: 1738                                              February 2017
Category: Standards Track 
ISSN: 2070-1721


                         The "file" URI Scheme

 Abstract

   This document provides a more complete specification of the "file"
   Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) scheme and replaces the very brief
   definition in Section 3.10 of RFC 1738.

   It defines a common syntax that is intended to interoperate across
   the broad spectrum of existing usages.  At the same time, it notes
   some other current practices around the use of file URIs.

 Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8089.

 Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.




Kerwin                       Standards Track                 PAGE 1 top


RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Operations Involving <file> URIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. File System Name Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Appendix A. Differences from Previous Specifications . . . . . . 10 Appendix B. Example URIs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendix C. Similar Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendix D. System-Specific Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 D.1. POSIX Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 D.2. DOS- and Windows-Like Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 D.3. Mac OS X Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 D.4. OpenVMS Files-11 Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Appendix E. Nonstandard Syntax Variations . . . . . . . . . . . 12 E.1. User Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 E.2. DOS and Windows Drive Letters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 E.2.1. Relative Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 E.2.2. Vertical Line Character . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 E.3. UNC Strings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 E.3.1. <file> URI with Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 E.3.2. <file> URI with UNC Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 E.4. Backslash as Separator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Appendix F. Collected Nonstandard Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 1. Introduction A file URI identifies an object (a "file") stored in a structured object naming and accessing environment on a host (a "file system"). The URI can be used in discussions about the file, and if other conditions are met it can be dereferenced to directly access the file. This document specifies a syntax based on the generic syntax of [RFC 3986] that is compatible with most existing usages. Where incompatibilities arise, they are usually in parts of the scheme that were underspecified in earlier definitions and have been tightened up by more recent specifications. Appendix A lists significant changes to syntax. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 2 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 Extensions to the syntax that might be encountered in practice are listed in Appendix E; these extensions are listed for informational purposes and are not a requirement of implementation. The file URI scheme is not coupled with a specific protocol nor with a specific media type [RFC 6838]. See Section 3 for a discussion of operations that can be performed on the object identified by a file URI. 1.1. Notational Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119] when they appear in all upper case. They may also appear in lower or mixed case as English words, without normative meaning. Throughout this document, the term "local file" is used to describe files that can be accessed through the local file system API using only the information included in the file path, not relying on other information (such as network addresses). It is important to note that a local file may not be physically located on the local machine, for example, if a networked file system is transparently mounted into the local file system. The term "local file URI" is used to describe file URIs that have no "authority" component or where the authority is the special string "localhost" or a fully qualified domain name that resolves to the machine from which the URI is being interpreted (Section 2). 2. Syntax The file URI syntax is defined here in Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) [RFC 5234], importing the "host" and "path-absolute" rules from [RFC 3986] (as updated by [RFC 6874]). The generic syntax in [RFC 3986] includes "path" and "authority" components, for each of which only a subset is used in the definition of the file URI scheme. The relevant subset of "path" is "path- absolute", and the subset of "authority" is "file-auth", given below. The syntax definition below is different from those given in [RFC 1630] and [RFC 1738] as it is derived from the generic syntax of [RFC 3986], which postdates the previous file URI specifications. Appendix A enumerates significant differences. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 3 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 file-URI = file-scheme ":" file-hier-part file-scheme = "file" file-hier-part = ( "//" auth-path ) / local-path auth-path = [ file-auth ] path-absolute local-path = path-absolute file-auth = "localhost" / host The "host" is the fully qualified domain name of the system on which the file is accessible. This allows a client on another system to know that it cannot access the file system, or perhaps that it needs to use some other local mechanism to access the file. As a special case, the "file-auth" rule can match the string "localhost" that is interpreted as "the machine from which the URI is being interpreted," exactly as if no authority were present. Some current usages of the scheme incorrectly interpret all values in the authority of a file URI, including "localhost", as non-local. Yet others interpret any value as local, even if the "host" does not resolve to the local machine. To maximize compatibility with previous specifications, users MAY choose to include an "auth-path" with no "file-auth" when creating a URI. The path component represents the absolute path to the file in the file system. See Appendix D for some discussion of system-specific concerns including absolute file paths and file system roots. Some file systems have case-sensitive file naming and some do not. As such, the file URI scheme supports case sensitivity in order to retain the case as given. Any transport-related handling of the file URI scheme MUST retain the case as given. Any mapping to or from a case-insensitive form is solely the responsibility of the implementation processing the file URI on behalf of the referenced file system. Also see Appendix E, which lists some nonstandard syntax variations that can be encountered in practice. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 4 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 3. Operations Involving <file> URIs See the POSIX file and directory operations [POSIX] for examples of standardized operations that can be performed on files. A file URI can be dependably dereferenced or translated to a local file path only if it is local. A file URI is considered "local" if it has no "file-auth", or the "file-auth" is the special string "localhost", or a fully qualified domain name that resolves to the machine from which the URI is being interpreted (Section 2). This specification neither defines nor forbids any set of operations that might be performed on a file identified by a non-local file URI. 4. File System Name Encoding File systems use various encoding schemes to store file and directory names. Many modern file systems store file and directory names as arbitrary sequences of octets, in which case the representation as an encoded string often depends on the user's localization settings or defaults to UTF-8 [STD63]. When a file URI is produced that represents textual data consisting of characters from the Unicode Standard coded character set [UNICODE], the data SHOULD be encoded as octets according to the UTF-8 character encoding scheme [STD63] before percent-encoding is applied (as per Section 2.5 of [RFC 3986]). A decision not to use percent-encoded UTF-8 is outside the scope of this specification. It will typically require the use of heuristics or explicit knowledge about the way the string will be processed. 5. Security Considerations There are many security considerations for URI schemes discussed in [RFC 3986]. File access and the granting of privileges for specific operations are complex topics, and the use of file URIs can complicate the security model in effect for file privileges. Historically, user agents have granted content from the file URI scheme a tremendous amount of privilege. However, granting all local files such wide privileges can lead to privilege escalation attacks. Some user agents have had success granting local files directory- based privileges, but this approach has not been widely adopted. Other user agents use globally unique identifiers as the origin for each file URI [RFC 6454], which is the most secure option. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 5 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 Treating a non-local file URI as local, or otherwise attempting to perform local operations on a non-local URI, can result in security problems. File systems typically assign an operational meaning to special characters, such as the "/", "\", ":", "[", and "]" characters, and to special device names like ".", "..", "...", "aux", "lpt", etc. In some cases, merely testing for the existence of such a name will cause the operating system to pause or invoke unrelated system calls, leading to significant security concerns regarding denial of service and unintended data transfer. It would not be possible for this specification to list all such significant characters and device names. Implementers should research the reserved names and characters for the types of storage devices that may be attached to their application and restrict the use of data obtained from URI components accordingly. File systems vary in the way they handle case. Care must be taken to avoid issues resulting from possibly unexpected aliasing from case- only differences between file paths or URIs or from mismatched encodings or Unicode equivalences [UAX15] (see Section 4). 6. IANA Considerations This document defines the following permanent URI scheme. The "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Schemes" registry has been updated accordingly. This registration complies with [BCP35]. Scheme name: file Status: permanent Applications/protocols that use this scheme name: Commonly used in hypertext documents to refer to files without depending on network access. Supported by major browsers. Used in development libraries, such as: * Windows Shell (PathCreateFromUrl, UrlCreateFromPath) * libwww-perl - The World-Wide Web library for Perl Contact: Applications and Real-Time Area <art@ietf.org> Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 6 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 Change Controller: IETF <ietf@ietf.org> References: This RFC 7. References 7.1. Normative References [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC 2119, March 1997, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2119>. [RFC 3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC 3986, January 2005, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 3986>. [RFC 5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, DOI 10.17487/RFC 5234, January 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 5234>. [RFC 6454] Barth, A., "The Web Origin Concept", RFC 6454, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6454, December 2011, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6454>. [RFC 6874] Carpenter, B., Cheshire, S., and R. Hinden, "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource Identifiers", RFC 6874, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6874, February 2013, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6874>. [STD63] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std63>. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 7 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 7.2. Informative References [Bash-Tilde] Free Software Foundation, Inc, "Bash Reference Manual: Tilde Expansion", September 2016, <http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/ Tilde-Expansion.html>. [BCP35] Thaler, D., Ed., Hansen, T., and T. Hardie, "Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes", BCP 35, RFC 7595, June 2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp35>. [Bug107540] Bugzilla@Mozilla, "Bug 107540", October 2001, <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107540>. [MS-DTYP] Microsoft, "Windows Data Types: 2.2.57 UNC", October 2015, <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg465305.aspx>. [POSIX] IEEE, "IEEE Std 1003.1, 2013 Edition - Standard for Information Technology-- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX(R)) Base Specifications, Issue 7", DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2013.6506091, April 2013. [RFC 1630] Berners-Lee, T., "Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW: A Unifying Syntax for the Expression of Names and Addresses of Objects on the Network as used in the World-Wide Web", RFC 1630, DOI 10.17487/RFC 1630, June 1994, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 1630>. [RFC 1738] Berners-Lee, T., Masinter, L., and M. McCahill, "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)", RFC 1738, DOI 10.17487/RFC 1738, December 1994, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 1738>. [RFC 2396] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax", RFC 2396, DOI 10.17487/RFC 2396, August 1998, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2396>. [RFC 6838] Freed, N., Klensin, J., and T. Hansen, "Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures", BCP 13, RFC 6838, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6838, January 2013, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6838>. [UAX15] Davis, M., Ed. and K. Whistler, Ed., "Unicode Standard Annex #15: Unicode Normalization Forms", February 2016, <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr15/tr15-44.html>. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 8 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 [UNICODE] The Unicode Consortium, "The Unicode Standard, Version 9.0.0", ISBN 978-1-936213-13-9, June 2016, <http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode9.0.0/>. [WHATWG-URL] WHATWG, "URL Living Standard", January 2017, <https://url.spec.whatwg.org/>. [Win32-Namespaces] Microsoft Developer Network Blogs, "Naming Files, Paths, and Namespaces", June 2013, <https://msdn.microsoft.com/ en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365247(v=vs.85).aspx>. [Zsh-Tilde] "The Z Shell Manual: 14.7 Filename Expansion", December 2015, <http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/ Expansion.html#Filename-Expansion>. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 9 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 Appendix A. Differences from Previous Specifications The syntax definition in Section 2 inherits incremental differences from the general syntax of [RFC 1738], as described by Appendix G of [RFC 2396] and Appendix D of [RFC 3986]. According to the definition in [RFC 1738], a file URL always started with the token "file://", followed by an (optionally blank) host name and a "/". The syntax given in Section 2 makes the entire authority component, including the double slashes "//", optional. Appendix B. Example URIs The syntax in Section 2 is intended to support file URIs that take the following forms: Local files: o A traditional file URI for a local file with an empty authority. This is the most common format in use today. For example: * "file:///path/to/file" o The minimal representation of a local file with no authority field and an absolute path that begins with a slash "/". For example: * "file:/path/to/file" Non-local files: o A non-local file with an explicit authority. For example: * "file://host.example.com/path/to/file" Appendix C. Similar Technologies o The WHATWG URL specification [WHATWG-URL] defines browser behavior for a variety of inputs, including file URIs. As a living document, it changes to reflect updates in browser behavior. As a result, its algorithms and syntax definitions may or may not be consistent with this specification. Implementors should be aware of this possible discrepancy if they expect to share file URIs with browsers that follow the WHATWG specification. o The Universal Naming Convention (UNC) [MS-DTYP] defines a string format that can perform a similar role to the file URI scheme in describing the location of files, except that files located by UNC filespace selector strings are typically stored on a remote Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 10 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 machine and accessed using a network protocol. Appendix E.3 lists some ways in which UNC filespace selector strings are currently made to interoperate with the file URI scheme. o The Microsoft Windows API defines Win32 Namespaces [Win32-Namespaces] for interacting with files and devices using Windows API functions. These namespaced paths are prefixed by "\\?\" for Win32 File Namespaces and "\\.\" for Win32 Device Namespaces. There is also a special case for UNC file paths in Win32 File Namespaces, referred to as "Long UNC", using the prefix "\\?\UNC\". This specification does not define a mechanism for translating namespaced paths to or from file URIs. Appendix D. System-Specific Operations This appendix is not normative. It highlights some observed behaviors and provides system-specific guidance for interacting with file URIs and paths. This is not an exhaustive list of operating or file systems; rather, it is intended to illustrate certain types of interactions that might be encountered. D.1. POSIX Systems In a POSIX file system, the root of the file system is represented as a directory with a zero-length name, usually written as "/"; the presence of this root in a file URI can be taken as given by the initial slash in the "path-absolute" rule. Common UNIX shells such as the Bourne-Again SHell (bash) and Z SHell (zsh) provide a function known as "tilde expansion" [Bash-Tilde] or "filename expansion" [Zsh-Tilde], where a path that begins with a tilde character "~" can be expanded out to a special directory name. No such facility exists using the file URI scheme; a tilde in a file URI is always just a tilde. D.2. DOS- and Windows-Like Systems When mapping a DOS- or Windows-like file path to a file URI, the drive letter (e.g., "c:") is typically mapped into the first path segment. Appendix E lists some nonstandard techniques for interacting with DOS- or Windows-like file paths and URIs. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 11 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 D.3. Mac OS X Systems The Hierarchical File System Plus (HFS+) uses a nonstandard normalization form, similar to Normalization Form D [UAX15]. Take care when transforming HFS+ file paths to and from URIs (Section 4). D.4. OpenVMS Files-11 Systems When mapping a Virtual Memory System (VMS) file path to a file URI, the device name is mapped into the first path segment. Note that the dollars sign "$" is a reserved character per the definition in Section 2.2 of [RFC 3986], so it should be percent-encoded if present in the device name. If the VMS file path includes a node reference, that reference is used as the authority. Where the original node reference includes a user name and password in an access control string, they can be transcribed into the authority using the nonstandard syntax extension in Appendix E.1. Appendix E. Nonstandard Syntax Variations These variations may be encountered by existing usages of the file URI scheme but are not supported by the normative syntax of Section 2. This appendix is not normative. E.1. User Information It might be necessary to include user information such as a user name in a file URI, for example, when mapping a VMS file path with a node reference that includes an access control string. To allow user information to be included in a file URI, the "file- auth" rule in Section 2 can be replaced with the following: file-auth = "localhost" / [ userinfo "@" ] host This uses the "userinfo" rule from [RFC 3986]. As discussed in the HP OpenVMS Systems Documentation <http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/84final/ba554_90015/ch03s09.html>, "access control strings include sufficient information to allow someone to break in to the remote account, [therefore] they create serious security exposure." In a similar vein, the presence of a Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 12 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 password in a "user:password" userinfo field is deprecated by [RFC 3986]. Take care when dealing with information that can be used to identify a user or grant access to a system. E.2. DOS and Windows Drive Letters On Windows- or DOS-like file systems, an absolute file path can begin with a drive letter. To facilitate this, the "local-path" rule in Section 2 can be replaced with the following: local-path = [ drive-letter ] path-absolute drive-letter = ALPHA ":" The "ALPHA" rule is defined in [RFC 5234]. This is intended to support the minimal representation of a local file in a DOS- or Windows-like environment, with no authority field and an absolute path that begins with a drive letter. For example: o "file:c:/path/to/file" URIs of the form "file:///c:/path/to/file" are already supported by the "path-absolute" rule. Note that comparison of drive letters in DOS or Windows file paths is case insensitive. In some usages of file URIs, drive letters are canonicalized by converting them to uppercase; other usages treat URIs that differ only in the case of the drive letter as identical. E.2.1. Relative Resolution To mimic the behavior of DOS- or Windows-like file systems, relative references beginning with a slash "/" can be resolved relative to the drive letter when present; resolution of ".." dot segments (per Section 5.2.4 of [RFC 3986]) can be modified to not ever overwrite the drive letter. For example: base URI: file:///c:/path/to/file.txt rel. ref.: /some/other/thing.bmp resolved: file:///c:/some/other/thing.bmp base URI: file:///c:/foo.txt rel. ref.: ../bar.txt resolved: file:///c:/bar.txt Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 13 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 A relative reference starting with a drive letter would be interpreted by a generic URI parser as a URI with the drive letter as its scheme. Instead, such a reference ought to be constructed with a leading slash "/" character (e.g., "/c:/foo.txt"). Relative references with a drive letter followed by a character other than a slash (e.g., "/c:bar/baz.txt" or "/c:../foo.txt") might not be accepted as dereferenceable URIs in DOS- or Windows-like systems. E.2.2. Vertical Line Character Historically, some usages of file URIs have included a vertical line character "|" instead of a colon ":" in the drive letter construct. [RFC 3986] forbids the use of the vertical line; however, it may be necessary to interpret or update old URIs. For interpreting such URIs, the "auth-path" and "local-path" rules in Section 2 and the "drive-letter" rule above can be replaced with the following: auth-path = [ file-auth ] path-absolute / [ file-auth ] file-absolute local-path = [ drive-letter ] path-absolute / file-absolute file-absolute = "/" drive-letter path-absolute drive-letter = ALPHA ":" / ALPHA "|" This is intended to support regular DOS or Windows file URIs with vertical line characters in the drive letter construct. For example: o "file:///c|/path/to/file" o "file:/c|/path/to/file" o "file:c|/path/to/file" To update such an old URI, replace the vertical line "|" with a colon ":". Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 14 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 E.3. UNC Strings Some usages of the file URI scheme allow UNC filespace selector strings [MS-DTYP] to be translated to and from file URIs, either by mapping the equivalent segments of the two schemes (hostname to authority, sharename+objectnames to path), or by mapping the entire UNC string to the path segment of a URI. E.3.1. <file> URI with Authority The following is an algorithmic description of the process of translating a UNC filespace selector string to a file URI by mapping the equivalent segments of the two schemes: 1. Initialize the URI with the "file:" scheme identifier. 2. Append the authority: 1. Append the "//" authority sigil to the URI. 2. Append the host-name field of the UNC string to the URI. 3. Append the share-name: 1. Transform the share-name to a path segment (see Section 3.3 of [RFC 3986]) to conform to the encoding rules of Section 2 of [RFC 3986]. 2. Append a delimiting slash character "/" and the transformed segment to the URI. 4. For each object-name: 1. Transform the objectname to a path segment as above. The colon character ":" is allowed as a delimiter before stream-name and stream-type in the file-name, if present. 2. Append a delimiting slash character "/" and the transformed segment to the URI. For example, the UNC String: UNC String: \\host.example.com\Share\path\to\file.txt would be transformed into the URI: URI: file://host.example.com/Share/path/to/file.txt Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 15 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 The inverse algorithm for translating a file URI to a UNC filespace selector string is left as an exercise for the reader. E.3.2. <file> URI with UNC Path It is common to encounter file URIs that encode entire UNC strings in the path, usually with all backslash "\" characters replaced with slashes "/". To interpret such URIs, the "auth-path" rule in Section 2 can be replaced with the following: auth-path = [ file-auth ] path-absolute / unc-authority path-absolute unc-authority = 2*3"/" file-host file-host = inline-IP / IPv4address / reg-name inline-IP = "%5B" ( IPv6address / IPvFuture ) "%5D" This syntax uses the "IPv4address", "IPv6address", "IPvFuture", and "reg-name" rules from [RFC 3986]. Note that the "file-host" rule is the same as "host" but with percent-encoding applied to "[" and "]" characters. This extended syntax is intended to support URIs that take the following forms, in addition to those in Appendix B: Non-local files: o The representation of a non-local file with an empty authority and a complete (transformed) UNC string in the path. For example: * "file:////host.example.com/path/to/file" o As above, with an extra slash between the empty authority and the transformed UNC string, as per the syntax defined in [RFC 1738]. For example: * "file://///host.example.com/path/to/file" This representation is notably used by the Firefox web browser. See Bugzilla#107540 [Bug107540]. It also further limits the definition of a "local file URI" by excluding any file URI with a path that encodes a UNC string. Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 16 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 E.4. Backslash as Separator Historically, some usages have copied entire file paths into the path components of file URIs. Where DOS or Windows file paths were thus copied, the resulting URI strings contained unencoded backslash "\" characters, which are forbidden by both [RFC 1738] and [RFC 3986]. It may be possible to translate or update such an invalid file URI by replacing all backslashes "\" with slashes "/" if it can be determined with reasonable certainty that the backslashes are intended as path separators. Appendix F. Collected Nonstandard Rules Here are the collected syntax rules for all optional appendices, presented for convenience. This collected syntax is not normative. file-URI = file-scheme ":" file-hier-part file-scheme = "file" file-hier-part = ( "//" auth-path ) / local-path auth-path = [ file-auth ] path-absolute / [ file-auth ] file-absolute / unc-authority path-absolute local-path = [ drive-letter ] path-absolute / file-absolute file-auth = "localhost" / [ userinfo "@" ] host unc-authority = 2*3"/" file-host file-host = inline-IP / IPv4address / reg-name inline-IP = "%5B" ( IPv6address / IPvFuture ) "%5D" file-absolute = "/" drive-letter path-absolute drive-letter = ALPHA ":" / ALPHA "|" Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 17 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 This collected syntax is intended to support file URIs that take the following forms: Local files: o A traditional file URI for a local file with an empty authority. For example: * "file:///path/to/file" o The minimal representation of a local file with no authority field and an absolute path that begins with a slash "/". For example: * "file:/path/to/file" o The minimal representation of a local file in a DOS- or Windows- based environment with no authority field and an absolute path that begins with a drive letter. For example: * "file:c:/path/to/file" o Regular DOS or Windows file URIs with vertical line characters in the drive letter construct. For example: * "file:///c|/path/to/file" * "file:/c|/path/to/file" * "file:c|/path/to/file" Non-local files: o The representation of a non-local file with an explicit authority. For example: * "file://host.example.com/path/to/file" o The "traditional" representation of a non-local file with an empty authority and a complete (transformed) UNC string in the path. For example: * "file:////host.example.com/path/to/file" o As above, with an extra slash between the empty authority and the transformed UNC string. For example: * "file://///host.example.com/path/to/file" Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 18 top

RFC 8089 "file" Scheme February 2017 Acknowledgements Contributions from many members of the IETF and W3C communities -- notably Dave Crocker, Graham Klyne, Tom Petch, and John Klensin -- are greatly appreciated. Additional thanks to Dave Risney, author of the informative IEBlog article <http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2006/12/06/file-uris-in- windows.aspx>, and Dave Thaler for their early comments and suggestions; and to Paul Hoffman, whose earlier work served as an inspiration for this undertaking. Author's Address Matthew Kerwin Queensland University of Technology Victoria Park Road Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059 Australia Email: matthew.kerwin@qut.edu.au Kerwin Standards Track PAGE 19 top

RFC TOTAL SIZE: 36893 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Saturday, February 18th, 2017 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 8089: The IETF Trust, Saturday, February 18th, 2017
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement