The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 6757   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 6757



Last modified on Thursday, October 18th, 2012

Permanent link to RFC 6757
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 6757
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 6757







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                S. Gundavelli, Ed.
Request for Comments: 6757                                         Cisco
Category: Standards Track                             J. Korhonen, Ed.
ISSN: 2070-1721                                   Nokia Siemens Networks
                                                              M. Grayson
                                                                K. Leung
                                                           R. Pazhyannur
                                                                   Cisco
                                                            October 2012


      Access Network Identifier (ANI) Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6

 Abstract

   The local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) domain is
   able to provide access-network- and access-operator-specific handling
   or policing of the mobile node traffic using information about the
   access network to which the mobile node is attached.  This
   specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option for
   carrying the access network identifier and the access operator
   identification information from the mobile access gateway to the
   local mobility anchor over Proxy Mobile IPv6.

 Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6757.

 Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect



Gundavelli, et al.           Standards Track                 PAGE 1 top


RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 2. Conventions and Terminology .....................................5 2.1. Conventions ................................................5 2.2. Terminology ................................................5 3. Access Network Identifier Option ................................5 3.1. Format of the Access Network Identifier Sub-Option .........6 3.1.1. Network-Identifier Sub-Option .......................7 3.1.2. Geo-Location Sub-Option .............................8 3.1.3. Operator-Identifier Sub-Option ......................9 4. Protocol Considerations ........................................10 4.1. Mobile Access Gateway Considerations ......................10 4.2. Local Mobility Anchor Considerations ......................13 5. IANA Considerations ............................................14 6. Protocol Configuration Variables ...............................15 7. Security Considerations ........................................16 8. Acknowledgements ...............................................17 9. References .....................................................17 9.1. Normative References ......................................17 9.2. Informative References ....................................18 Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 2 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 1. Introduction Proxy Mobile IPv6 [RFC 5213] can be used for supporting network-based mobility management in various types of network deployments. Network architectures such as service provider Wi-Fi access aggregation or Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) integrated with mobile packet core are examples where Proxy Mobile IPv6 is a component of the overall architecture. Some of these architectures require the ability of the local mobility anchor (LMA) [RFC 5213] to provide differentiated services and policing of traffic to the mobile nodes based on the access network to which they are attached. Policy systems in mobility architectures such as the Policy and Charging Control (PCC) Framework [TS23203] and the Access Network Discovery and Selection Function (ANDSF) [TS23402] in Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) systems allow configuration of policy rules with conditions based on the access network information. For example, the service treatment for the mobile node's traffic may be different when it is attached to an access network owned by the home operator than when owned by a roaming partner. The service treatment can also be different based on the configured Service Set Identifiers (SSIDs) in the case of access networks based on IEEE 802.11. Other examples of location services include the operator's ability to display a location-specific web page or apply tariff based on the location. The Proxy Mobile IPv6 specification [RFC 5213] requires the Access Technology Type (ATT) option to be carried from the mobile access gateway (MAG) to the local mobility anchor. This is a mandatory option. However, the Access Technology Type alone is not necessarily sufficient for a suitable policy to be applied at the local mobility anchor. Therefore, there is a need for additional access-network- related information to be available at the local mobility anchor. Learning the identity of the access network operator may not be possible for a local mobility anchor without the support of an additional policy framework that is able to provide required information out of band to the local mobility anchor. Such a policy framework may not be required for all Proxy Mobile IPv6 deployments; hence, an alternative approach for optionally carrying such information is required to ensure that additional information related to the access network is available. This document defines a new mobility option, the Access Network Identifier (ANI) option, and its sub-options for Proxy Mobile IPv6, which can be used by the mobile access gateway to signal the access network information to the local mobility anchor. The specific details on how the local mobility anchor uses the information contained in the Access Network Identifier option are out of scope for this document. This information is intended for use between infrastructure nodes providing mobile management service and is not Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 3 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 exposed to outside entities, which ensures the location of the network to which the mobile node is attached, or any other access- network-specific information, is not revealed to other mobile nodes within the PMIPv6 domain or to other nodes outside the PMIPv6 domain. However, the location and access information MAY be exposed to specific parties outside the PMIPv6 domain based on an agreement approved by the subscriber; otherwise, this information MUST NOT be exposed in the absence of such agreements. If the location information is to be exposed outside the PMIPv6 domain, then that MUST be done using a Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO) [RFC 5139] carrying the usage rules to which the subscriber has agreed. This mobility option is optional and is not mandatory for the Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol. However, the Access Technology Type option continues to be a mandatory option and always needs to be carried in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 signaling messages. SSID: IETF-1 Geo-Location: 37o49'11"N 122o28'43"W Operator-Identifier: provider1.example.com +--+ |AP|-------. {Access-Specific Policies) +--+ | _-----_ | +-----+ _( )_ +-----+ | MAG |-=====( PMIPv6 )======-| LMA |- +-----+ (_ Tunnel_) +-----+ +--+ | '-----' |AP|-------' +--+ SSID: IETF-2 Geo-Location: 59o19'40.21"N 18o 3'18.36"E Operator-Identifier: provider2.example.com Figure 1: Access Networks Attached to MAG Figure 1 illustrates an example Proxy Mobile IPv6 deployment where the mobile access gateway delivers the information elements related to the access network to the local mobility anchor over Proxy Mobile IPv6 signaling messages. In this example, the additional information could comprise the SSID of the used IEEE 802.11 network, the geo- location of the network to which the mobile node is attached, and the identities of the operators running the IEEE 802.11 access network infrastructure. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 4 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 2. Conventions and Terminology 2.1. Conventions The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC 2119]. 2.2. Terminology All the mobility-related terms used in this document are to be interpreted as defined in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 specifications [RFC 5213] and [RFC 5844]. Additionally, this document uses the following abbreviations: Service Set Identifier Service Set Identifier (SSID) identifies the name of the IEEE 802.11 network. SSID differentiates one network from the other. Operator-Identifier The Operator-Identifier is the Structure of Management Information (SMI) Network Management Private Enterprise Code of the IANA- maintained "Private Enterprise Numbers" registry [SMI]. It identifies the operator running the network attached to a specific interface of the mobile access gateway. 3. Access Network Identifier Option The Access Network Identifier option is a mobility header option used to exchange information related to the access network between a local mobility anchor and a mobile access gateway. The option can be included in both Proxy Binding Update (PBU) and Proxy Binding Acknowledgement (PBA) messages, and there MUST NOT be more than a single instance of this mobility option in a mobility message. The Access Network Identifier mobility option MUST contain one or more Access Network Identifier sub-options. The Access Network Identifier sub-option is described in Section 3.1. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 5 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 The alignment requirement for this option is 4n [RFC 2460]. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... ANI Sub-option(s) ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: Access Network Identifier Option Type: MUST be set to the value of 52, indicating that it is a Network-Identifier option. Length: 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the length in octets of the option, excluding the Type and Length fields. 3.1. Format of the Access Network Identifier Sub-Option The Access Network Identifier sub-options are used for carrying information elements related to the access network to which the mobile node is attached. These sub-options can be included in the Access Network Identifier option defined in Section 3. The format of this sub-option is as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ANI Type | ANI Length | Option Data ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 3: Access Network Identifier Sub-Option ANI Type: 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the type of the Access Network Identifier sub-option. This specification defines the following types: 0 - Reserved 1 - Network-Identifier sub-option 2 - Geo-Location sub-option 3 - Operator-Identifier sub-option Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 6 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 ANI Length: 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the number of octets needed to encode the Option Data, excluding the ANI Type and ANI Length fields of the sub-option. 3.1.1. Network-Identifier Sub-Option The Network-Identifier is a mobility sub-option carried in the Access Network Identifier option defined in Section 3. This sub-option carries the name of the access network (e.g., an SSID in the case of an IEEE 802.11 Access Network or a Public Land-based Mobile Network (PLMN) Identifier [TS23003] in the case of 3GPP access) to which the mobile node is attached. There MUST be no more than a single instance of this specific sub-option in any Access Network Identifier option. The format of this option is defined below. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ANI Type=1 | ANI Length |E| Reserved | Net-Name Len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Network Name (e.g., SSID or PLMNID) ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | AP-Name Len | Access-Point Name ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 4: Network-Identifier Sub-Option ANI Type: MUST be set to the value of (1), indicating that it is a Network-Identifier sub-option ANI Length: Total length of this sub-option in octets, excluding the ANI Type and ANI Length fields. The value can be in the range of 5 to 32 octets. E: 1-bit flag indicating whether the Network Name is encoded in UTF-8. If this flag is set to one (1), then the Network Name is encoded using UTF-8 [RFC 3629]. If the flag is set to zero (0), this indicates that the encoding is undefined and is determined by out-of-band mechanisms. Implementations SHOULD use UTF-8 encoding. Reserved: MUST be set to zero when sending and ignored when received. Net-Name Length: 8-bit field for representing the length of the Network Name in octets. This field MUST NOT be set to zero. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 7 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 Network Name: The name of the access network to which the mobile node is attached. The type of the Network Name is dependent on the access technology to which the mobile node is attached. If it is 802.11 access, the Network Name MUST be the SSID of the network. If the access network is 3GPP access, the Network Name is the PLMN Identifier of the network. If the access network is 3GPP2 access, the Network Name is the Access Network Identifier [ANI]. When encoding the PLMN Identifier, both the Mobile Network Code (MNC) [TS23003] and Mobile Country Code (MCC) [TS23003] MUST be 3 digits. If the MNC in use only has 2 digits, then it MUST be preceded with a '0'. Encoding MUST be UTF-8. AP-Name Len: 8-bit field for representing the length of the Access- Point Name in octets. If the Access-Point Name is not included, then this length MUST be set to a value of zero. Access-Point Name: The name of the access point (physical device name) to which the mobile node is attached. This is the identifier that uniquely identifies the access point. While Network Name (e.g., SSID) identifies the operator's access network, Access-Point Name identifies a specific network device in the network to which the mobile node is attached. In some deployments, the Access-Point Name can be set to the Media Access Control (MAC) address of the device or some unique identifier that can be used by the policy systems in the operator network to unambiguously identify the device. The string is carried in UTF-8 representation. 3.1.2. Geo-Location Sub-Option The Geo-Location is a mobility sub-option carried in the Access Network Identifier option defined in Section 3. This sub-option carries the geo-location of the network to which the mobile node is attached, as known to the mobile access gateway. There MUST be no more than a single instance of this specific sub-option in any Access Network Identifier option. The format of this option is defined below and encodes the coordinates of an ellipsoid point. The format is based on the coordinate reference system specified in the World Geodetic System 1984 [WGS84]. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 8 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ANI Type=2 | ANI Length=6 | Latitude Degrees +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Longitude Degrees | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 5: Geo-Location ANI Sub-Option ANI Type: MUST be set to the value of (2), indicating that it is the Geo-Location sub-option ANI Length: Total length of this sub-option in octets, excluding the ANI Type and ANI Length fields. It MUST be set to a value of (6). Latitude Degrees: A 24-bit latitude degree value encoded as a two's complement, fixed point number with 9 whole bits. Positive degrees correspond to the Northern Hemisphere and negative degrees correspond to the Southern Hemisphere. The value ranges from -90 to +90 degrees. Longitude Degrees: A 24-bit longitude degree value encoded as a two's complement, fixed point number with 9 whole bits. The value ranges from -180 to +180 degrees. 3.1.3. Operator-Identifier Sub-Option The Operator-Identifier is a mobility sub-option carried in the Access Network Identifier option defined in Section 3. This sub- option carries the Operator-Identifier of the access network to which the mobile node is attached. There MUST be no more than a single instance of this specific sub-option in any Access Network Identifier option. The format of this option is defined below. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ANI Type=3 | ANI Length | Op-ID Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Operator-Identifier ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 6: Operator-Identifier Sub-Option Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 9 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 ANI Type: It MUST be set to the value of (3), indicating that it is the Operator-Identifier sub-option ANI Length: Total length of this sub-option in octets, excluding the ANI Type and ANI Length fields. Operator-Identifier (Op-ID) Type: 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the type of the Operator-Identifier. Currently, the following types are defined: 0 - Reserved. 1 - Operator-Identifier as a variable-length Private Enterprise Number (PEN) [SMI] encoded in a network-byte order. The maximum PEN value depends on the ANI Length and is calculated using the formula: maximum PEN = 2^((ANI_length-1)*8)-1. For example, the ANI Length of 4 allows for encoding PENs from 0 to 2^24-1, i.e., from 0 to 16777215, and uses 3 octets of Operator-Identifier space. 2 - Realm of the operator. Realm names are required to be unique and are piggybacked on the administration of the DNS namespace. Realms meet the syntactic requirements of the "Preferred Name Syntax" defined in Section 2.3.1 of [RFC 1035]. They are encoded as US-ASCII. 3GPP specifications also define realm names that can be used to convey PLMN Identifiers [TS23003]. Operator-Identifier: Up to 253 octets of the Operator-Identifier. The encoding of the identifier depends on the used Operator- Identifier Type. For Operator-Identifiers defined in this specification, the Operator-Identifier MUST NOT be empty. 4. Protocol Considerations The following considerations apply to the local mobility anchor and the mobile access gateway. 4.1. Mobile Access Gateway Considerations o The conceptual Binding Update List entry data structure maintained by the mobile access gateway, described in Section 6.1 of [RFC 5213], MUST be extended to store the access-network-related information elements associated with the current session. Specifically, the following parameters MUST be defined: Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 10 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 Network-Identifier Operator-Identifier Geo-Location o If the mobile access gateway is configured to support the Access Network Information option, it SHOULD include this option with the specific sub-options in all Proxy Binding Update messages (including Proxy Binding Updates for lifetime extension and for deregistration) that it sends to the local mobility anchor. The Access Network Information option MUST be constructed as specified in Section 3. It SHOULD include the ANI sub-option(s) that the mobile access gateway is configured to carry in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 messages. o The access network information elements, such as Network- Identifier, Geo-Location, and Operator-Identifier, typically are statically configured on the mobile access gateway on a per- interface basis (for example, access point (AP-1) is attached through interface-1, and the SSID is X, Geo-Location is Y). In some deployments, this information can also be dynamically obtained, such as through DHCP Option (82), which is the DHCP Relay Agent Information option [RFC 3046]. When the mobile node sends a DHCP Request, the access points typically add the SSID information to the Option 82 of the DHCP request, and when the mobile access gateway receives this request, it can parse the Option 82 of the DHCP request and obtain the SSID name. The mobility access gateway can also obtain this information from the DHCPv6 GeoLoc Option [RFC 6225]. The specific details on how the mobile access gateway obtains these information elements are access technology and deployment specific and are outside the scope of this document. It is possible those information elements are configured on the MAG on a per-interface basis or dynamically obtained through some out-of-band means, such as based on the Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) protocol. o If the protocol configuration variable EnableANISubOptNetworkIdentifier (Section 6) is set to a value of (1), the mobile access gateway SHOULD include the Network- Identifier sub-option in the Access Network Identifier option carried in the Proxy Binding Update. However, if the mobile access gateway is unable to obtain the Network-Identifier, then it MUST NOT include this sub-option. For including the Network- Identifier sub-option, the mobile access gateway needs to be aware of the Network Name of the access network (e.g., SSID in the case of a WLAN access network) to which the mobile node is attached. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 11 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 This sub-option also includes the Access-Point Name for carrying the name of the access point to which the mobile node is attached. The Access-Point Name is specially important for applying location services, given that the Network Name (e.g., SSID) may not provide the needed uniqueness for identifying a location. When included, this sub-option MUST be constructed as described in Section 3.1.1 o If the protocol configuration variable EnableANISubOptGeoLocation (Section 6) is set to a value of (1), the mobile access gateway SHOULD include the Geo-Location sub-option in the Access Network Identifier option carried in the Proxy Binding Update. However, if the mobile access gateway is unable to obtain the Geo-location, then it MUST NOT include this sub-option. For including the Geo- Location sub-option, the mobile access gateway needs to be aware of the GPS coordinates of the network to which the mobile node is attached. When included, this sub-option MUST be constructed as described in Section 3.1.2. o If the protocol configuration variable EnableANISubOptOperatorIdentifier (Section 6) is set to a value of (1), the mobile access gateway SHOULD include the Operator- Identifier sub-option in the Access Network Identifier option carried in the Proxy Binding Update. For including the Operator- Identifier sub-option, the mobile access gateway needs to be aware of the operator identity of that access network. The access network operator SHOULD obtain an identifier from the "Private Enterprise Number" registry, in order for the mobile access gateway to carry the Operator-Identifier. If a given access network operator has not obtained an identifier from the "Private Enterprise Number" registry or if the mobile access gateway is unable to learn the operator identity for any other administrative reasons, then it MUST NOT include this sub-option. When included, this sub-option MUST be constructed as described in Section 3.1.3. If the mobile access gateway had any of the Access Network Information mobility options included the Proxy Binding Update sent to a local mobility anchor, then the Proxy Binding Acknowledgement received from the local mobility anchor SHOULD contain the Access Network Information mobility option with the specific sub-options. If the mobile access gateway receives a Proxy Binding Acknowledgement with a successful Status Value but without an Access Network Information mobility option, then the mobile access gateway SHOULD log the event and, based on its local policy, MAY proceed to terminate the mobility session. In this case, the mobile access gateway knows the local mobility anchor does not understand the Access Network Information mobility option and therefore MAY consider it as a misconfiguration of the Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 12 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 4.2. Local Mobility Anchor Considerations o The conceptual Binding Cache entry data structure maintained by the local mobility anchor, described in Section 5.1 of [RFC 5213], MUST be extended to store the access-network-related information elements associated with the current session. Specifically, the following parameters MUST be defined: Network-Identifier Geo-Location Operator-Identifier o On receiving a Proxy Binding Update message [RFC 5213] from a mobile access gateway with the Access Network Information option, the local mobility anchor must process the option and update the corresponding fields in the Binding Cache entry. If the option is not understood by that LMA implementation, it will skip the option. o If the local mobility anchor understands the Access Network Identifier mobility option received in a Proxy Binding Update and also supports the sub-option(s), then the local mobility anchor MUST echo the Access Network Identifier mobility option with the specific sub-option(s) that it accepted back to the mobile access gateway in a Proxy Binding Acknowledgement. The Access Network Identifier sub-options defined in this specification MUST NOT be altered by the local mobility anchor. o If the received Proxy Binding Update message does not include the Access Network Information option, then the mobility session associated with that Proxy Binding Update MUST be updated to remove any access network information elements. o The local mobility anchor MAY choose to use the Access Network Information sub-options for applying any access-operator-specific handling or policing of the mobile node traffic. The specific details on how these sub-options are used is outside the scope of this document. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 13 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 5. IANA Considerations Per this document, the following IANA actions have been completed. o Action 1: This specification defines a new mobility header option, the Access Network Identifier. This mobility option is described in Section 3. The type value (52) for this option has been assigned from the same numbering space as allocated for the other mobility options, as defined in [RFC 6275]. o Action 2: This specification defines a new mobility sub-option format, the Access Network Information (ANI) sub-option. The format of this mobility sub-option is described in Section 3.1. This sub-option can be carried in the Access Network Information option. The type value for this sub-option is managed by IANA, under the registry "Access Network Information (ANI) Sub-Option Type Values". This specification reserves the following type values. Approval of new Access Network Information (ANI) sub- option type values are to be made through IANA Expert Review. +=========================================================+ | 0 | Reserved | +=========================================================+ | 1 | Network-Identifier sub-option | +=========================================================+ | 2 | Geo-Location sub-option | +=========================================================+ | 3 | Operator-Identifier sub-option | +=========================================================+ o Action 3: This specification defines a new mobility sub-option, the Operator-Identifier sub-option. The format of this mobility sub-option is described in Section 3.1.3. The Operator-Identifier (Op-ID) Type field of this sub-option introduces a new number space. This number space is managed by IANA, under the registry "Operator-Identifier Type Registry". This specification reserves the following type values. Approval of new Operator-Identifier type values are to be made through IANA Expert Review. +===============================================+ | 0 | Reserved | +===+===========================================+ | 1 | Operator-Identifier as a variable-length | | | Private Enterprise Number (PEN) | +===+===========================================+ | 2 | Realm of the Operator | +===+===========================================+ Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 14 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 6. Protocol Configuration Variables This specification defines the following configuration variables that control the use of sub-options related to the Access Network Information in Proxy Mobile IPv6 signaling messages. The mobility entities, local mobility anchor, and mobile access gateway MUST allow these variables to be configured by the system management. The configured values for these protocol variables MUST survive server reboots and service restarts. EnableANISubOptNetworkIdentifier This flag indicates the operational state of the Network- Identifier sub-option support. This configuration variable is available at both the mobile access gateway and the local mobility anchor. The default value for this flag is set to (0), indicating that support for the Network-Identifier sub-option is disabled. When this flag on the mobile access gateway is set to a value of (1), the mobile access gateway SHOULD include this sub-option in the Proxy Binding Update messages that it sends to the local mobility anchor; otherwise, it SHOULD NOT include the sub-option. There can be situations where the mobile access gateway is unable to obtain the Network-Identifier and may not be able to construct this sub-option. Similarly, when this flag on the local mobility anchor is set to a value of (1), the local mobility anchor SHOULD enable support for this sub-option; otherwise, it SHOULD ignore this sub-option. EnableANISubOptGeoLocation This flag indicates the operational state of the Geo-Location sub- option support. This configuration variable is available at both the mobile access gateway and the local mobility anchor. The default value for this flag is set to (0), indicating that support for the Geo-Location sub-option is disabled. When this flag on the mobile access gateway is set to a value of (1), the mobile access gateway SHOULD include this sub-option in the Proxy Binding Update messages that it sends to the local mobility anchor; otherwise, it SHOULD NOT include the sub-option. There can be situations where the mobile access gateway is unable to obtain the geo-location information and may not be able to construct this sub-option. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 15 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 Similarly, when this flag on the local mobility anchor is set to a value of (1), the local mobility anchor SHOULD enable support for this sub-option; otherwise, it SHOULD ignore this sub-option. EnableANISubOptOperatorIdentifier This flag indicates the operational state of the Operator- Identifier sub-option support. This configuration variable is available at both the mobile access gateway and the local mobility anchor. The default value for this flag is set to (0), indicating that support for the Operator-Identifier sub-option is disabled. When this flag on the mobile access gateway is set to a value of (1), the mobile access gateway SHOULD include this sub-option in the Proxy Binding Update messages that it sends to the local mobility anchor; otherwise, it SHOULD NOT include the sub-option. There can be situations where the mobile access gateway is unable to obtain the Operator-Identifier information and may not be able to construct this sub-option. Similarly, when this flag on the local mobility anchor is set to a value of (1), the local mobility anchor SHOULD enable support for this sub-option; otherwise, it SHOULD ignore this sub-option. 7. Security Considerations The Access Network Information option defined in this specification is for use in Proxy Binding Update and Proxy Binding Acknowledgement messages. This option is carried like any other mobility header option as specified in [RFC 6275] and does not require any special security considerations. The Geo-Location sub-option carried in the Access Network Information option exposes the geo-location of the network to which the mobile node is attached. This information is considered to be very sensitive, so care must be taken to secure the Proxy Mobile IPv6 signaling messages when carrying this sub-option. The base Proxy Mobile IPv6 specification [RFC 5213] specifies the use of IPsec for securing the signaling messages, and those mechanisms can be enabled for protecting this information. Operators can potentially apply IPsec Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) with confidentiality and integrity protection for protecting the location information. Access-network-specific information elements that the mobile access gateway sends may have been dynamically learned over DHCP or using other protocols. If proper security mechanisms are not in place, the exchanged information may be potentially compromised with the mobile access gateway sending incorrect access network parameters to the Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 16 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 local mobility anchor. This situation may potentially result in incorrect service policy enforcement at the local mobility anchor and impact to other services that depend on this access network information. This threat can be mitigated by ensuring the communication path between the mobile access gateway and the access points is properly secured by the use of IPsec, Transport Layer Security (TLS), or other security protocols. 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Basavaraj Patil, Carlos Bernardos, Gerardo Gieratta, Eric Voit, Hidetoshi Yokota, Ryuji Wakikawa, Sangram Kishore, William Wan, Stefano Faccin, and Brian Haberman for all the discussions related to this topic. The authors would also like to acknowledge the IESG reviews from Benoit Claise, Stephen Farrell, Pete Resnick, Robert Spark, Martin Thomson, and Ralph Droms. 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC 1035] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, November 1987. [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC 3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003. [RFC 5139] Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, "Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5139, February 2008. [RFC 5213] Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury, K., and B. Patil, "Proxy Mobile IPv6", RFC 5213, August 2008. [RFC 5844] Wakikawa, R. and S. Gundavelli, "IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6", RFC 5844, May 2010. [RFC 6275] Perkins, C., Johnson, D., and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6", RFC 6275, July 2011. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 17 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 9.2. Informative References [ANI] 3GPP2 TSG-A, "Interoperability Specification (IOS) for High Rate Packet Data (HRPD) Radio Access Network Interfaces with Session Control in the Access Network", A.S0008-A v3.0, October 2008. [RFC 2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998. [RFC 3046] Patrick, M., "DHCP Relay Agent Information Option", RFC 3046, January 2001. [RFC 6225] Polk, J., Linsner, M., Thomson, M., and B. Aboba, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options for Coordinate-Based Location Configuration Information", RFC 6225, July 2011. [SMI] IANA, "PRIVATE ENTERPRISE NUMBERS", SMI Network Management Private Enterprise Codes, <http://www.iana.org/assignments/enterprise-numbers>. [TS23003] 3GPP, "Numbering, addressing and identification", 3GPP TS 23.003 3.15.0, 2012. [TS23203] 3GPP, "Policy and Charging Control Architecture", 3GPP TS 23.203 10.7.0, 2012. [TS23402] 3GPP, "Architecture enhancements for non-3GPP accesses", 3GPP TS 23.402 10.7.0, 2012. [WGS84] NIMA, "World Geodetic System 1984", Third Edition, NIMA TR8350.2, June 2004. Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 18 top

RFC 6757 Access Network Identifier Option October 2012 Authors' Addresses Sri Gundavelli (editor) Cisco 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 USA EMail: sgundave@cisco.com Jouni Korhonen (editor) Nokia Siemens Networks Linnoitustie 6 Espoo FIN-02600 Finland EMail: jouni.nospam@gmail.com Mark Grayson Cisco 11 New Square Park Bedfont Lakes, Feltham TW14 8HA England EMail: mgrayson@cisco.com Kent Leung Cisco 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 USA EMail: kleung@cisco.com Rajesh Pazhyannur Cisco 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134 USA EMail: rpazhyan@cisco.com Gundavelli, et al. Standards Track PAGE 19 top

RFC TOTAL SIZE: 43863 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Thursday, October 18th, 2012 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 6757: The IETF Trust, Thursday, October 18th, 2012
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement