The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 6519   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 6519



Last modified on Tuesday, February 14th, 2012

Permanent link to RFC 6519
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 6519
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 6519







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       R. Maglione
Request for Comments: 6519                                Telecom Italia
Category: Standards Track                                    A. Durand
ISSN: 2070-1721                                         Juniper Networks
                                                           February 2012


                 RADIUS Extensions for Dual-Stack Lite

 Abstract

   Dual-Stack Lite is a solution to offer both IPv4 and IPv6
   connectivity to customers that are addressed only with an IPv6
   prefix.  Dual-Stack Lite requires pre-configuration of the Dual-Stack
   Lite Address Family Transition Router (AFTR) tunnel information on
   the Basic Bridging BroadBand (B4) element.  In many networks, the
   customer profile information may be stored in Authentication,
   Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) servers, while client
   configurations are mainly provided through the Dynamic Host
   Configuration Protocol (DHCP).  This document specifies a new Remote
   Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) attribute to carry the
   Dual-Stack Lite AFTR tunnel name; the RADIUS attribute is defined
   based on the equivalent DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME option.  This RADIUS
   attribute is meant to be used between the RADIUS server and the
   Network Access Server (NAS); it is not intended to be used directly
   between the B4 element and the RADIUS server.

 Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6519.











Maglione & Durand            Standards Track                 PAGE 1 top


RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 2. Terminology .....................................................4 3. DS-Lite Configuration with RADIUS and DHCPv6 ....................4 4. RADIUS Attribute ................................................7 4.1. DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name ........................................7 5. Table of Attributes .............................................9 6. Security Considerations .........................................9 7. IANA Considerations .............................................9 8. References .....................................................10 8.1. Normative References ......................................10 8.2. Informative References ....................................10 Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 2 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 1. Introduction Dual-Stack Lite [RFC 6333] is a solution to offer both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity to customers that are addressed only with an IPv6 prefix (no IPv4 address is assigned to the attachment device). One of its key components is an IPv4-over-IPv6 tunnel, but a Dual-Stack-Lite Basic Bridging BroadBand (B4) element will not know if the network to which it is attached offers Dual-Stack Lite support. Even if the B4 did know, it would not know the remote end of the tunnel to which it could establish a connection. To inform the B4 element of the location of the Address Family Transition Router (AFTR), a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) may be used. Once this information is conveyed, the presence of the configuration indicating the AFTR's location also informs a host to initiate Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite) service and become a Softwire Initiator. [RFC 6334] specifies a DHCPv6 option that is meant to be used by a DS-Lite client (B4 element) to discover its AFTR name. In order to be able to populate such an option, the DHCPv6 server must be pre-provisioned with the AFTR name. In broadband environments, a customer profile may be managed by Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) servers, together with AAA for users. The Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) protocol [RFC 2865] is usually used by AAA servers to communicate with network elements. [RADIUS-IPv6] describes a typical broadband network scenario in which the Network Access Server (NAS) acts as the access gateway for the users (hosts or Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) devices) and also embeds a DHCPv6 server function that allows it to locally handle any DHCPv6 requests issued by the clients. Since the DS-Lite AFTR information can be stored in AAA servers and the client configuration is mainly provided through DHCP running between the NAS and the requesting clients, a new RADIUS attribute is needed to send AFTR information from the AAA server to the NAS. This document defines a new RADIUS attribute to be used for carrying the DS-Lite Tunnel Name, based on the equivalent DHCPv6 option already specified in [RFC 6334]. Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 3 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119]. The terms DS-Lite Basic Bridging BroadBand element (B4) and the DS-Lite Address Family Transition Router element (AFTR) are defined in [RFC 6333]. 3. DS-Lite Configuration with RADIUS and DHCPv6 Figure 1 illustrates how the RADIUS protocol and DHCPv6 work together to accomplish DS-Lite configuration on the B4 element when a PPP session is used to provide connectivity to the user. The NAS operates as a client of RADIUS and as a DHCP Server. The NAS initially sends a RADIUS Access-Request message to the RADIUS server, requesting authentication. Once the RADIUS server receives the request, it validates the sending client, and if the request is approved, the AAA server replies with an Access-Accept message including a list of attribute-value pairs that describe the parameters to be used for this session. This list MAY also contain the AFTR tunnel name. When the NAS receives a DHCPv6 client request containing the DS-Lite tunnel option, the NAS SHALL use the name returned in the RADIUS DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute to populate the DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME option in the DHCPv6 reply message. Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 4 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 B4 NAS AAA | | Server | | | |----PPP LCP Config-Request------> | | | | | | |----Access-Request ---->| | | | | |<---- Access-Accept-----| | | (DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name) | |<-----PPP LCP Config-ACK ------- | | | | | | | | |--- PPP IPv6CP Config-Request --->| | | | | |<----- PPP IPv6CP Config-ACK -----| | | | | |------- DHCPv6 Solicit -------->| | | | | |<-------DHCPv6 Advertisement -----| | | (DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME) | | | | | |------- DHCPv6 Request -------->| | | | | |<-------- DHCPv6 Reply ---------- | | | (DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME) | | DHCPv6 RADIUS Figure 1: RADIUS and DHCPv6 Message Flow for a PPP Session Figure 2 illustrates how the RADIUS protocol and DHCPv6 work together to accomplish DS-Lite configuration on the B4 element when an IP session is used to provide connectivity to the user. The only difference between this message flow and the previous one is that in this scenario, the interaction between the NAS and the AAA/ RADIUS server is triggered by the DHCPv6 Solicit message received by the NAS from the B4 acting as a DHCPv6 client, while in the case of a PPP session, the trigger is the PPP Link Control Protocol (LCP) Config-Request message received by the NAS. Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 5 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 B4 NAS AAA | | Server |------ DHCPv6 Solicit ---------> | | | | | | |----Access-Request ---->| | | | | |<---Access-Accept-------| | | (DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name) | | | | |<-------DHCPv6 Advertisement------| | | (DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME) | | | | | |------- DHCPv6 Request -------->| | | | | | | | |<----- DHCPv6 Reply ------------- | | | (DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME) | | DHCPv6 RADIUS Figure 2: RADIUS and DHCPv6 Message Flow for an IP Session In the scenario depicted in Figure 2, the Access-Request packet contains a Service-Type attribute with the value Authorize Only (17); thus, according to [RFC 5080], the Access-Request packet MUST contain a State attribute. After receiving the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute in the initial Access-Accept packet, the NAS MUST store the received AFTR tunnel name locally. When the B4 sends a DHCPv6 Renew message to request an extension of the lifetimes for the assigned address or prefix, the NAS does not have to initiate a new Access-Request packet towards the AAA server to request the AFTR tunnel name. The NAS retrieves the previously stored AFTR tunnel name and uses it in its reply. According to [RFC 3315], if the DHCPv6 server to which the DHCPv6 Renew message was sent at time T1 has not responded, the DHCPv6 client initiates a Rebind/Reply message exchange with any available server. In this scenario, the NAS receiving the DHCPv6 Rebind message MUST initiate a new Access-Request message towards the AAA server. The NAS MAY include the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute in its Access-Request message. If the NAS does not receive the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute in the Access-Accept message, it MAY fall back to a pre-configured default tunnel name, if any. If the NAS does not have any pre-configured Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 6 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 default tunnel name or if the NAS receives an Access-Reject message, the IPv4-over-IPv6 tunnel cannot be established; thus, the B4 element has only IPv6 connectivity. 4. RADIUS Attribute This section specifies the format of the new RADIUS attribute. 4.1. DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name The DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name RADIUS attribute contains an FQDN that refers to the AFTR to which the client is requested to establish a connection. The NAS SHALL use the name returned in the RADIUS DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute to populate the DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME option [RFC 6334]. This attribute MAY be used in Access-Request packets as a hint to the RADIUS server; for example, if the NAS is pre-configured with a default tunnel name, this name MAY be inserted in the attribute. The RADIUS server MAY ignore the hint sent by the NAS, and it MAY assign a different AFTR tunnel name. If the NAS includes the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute, but the AAA server does not recognize it, this attribute MUST be ignored by the AAA server. If the NAS does not receive the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute in the Access-Accept message, it MAY fall back to a pre-configured default tunnel name, if any. If the NAS does not have any pre-configured default tunnel name, the tunnel cannot be established. If the NAS is pre-provisioned with a default AFTR tunnel name and the AFTR tunnel name received in the Access-Accept message is different from the configured default, then the AFTR tunnel name received in the Access-Accept message MUST be used for the session. If the NAS cannot support the received AFTR tunnel name for any reason, the tunnel SHOULD NOT be established. When the Access-Request message is triggered by a DHCPv6 Rebind message, if the AFTR tunnel name received in the Access-Accept message is different from the currently used one for that session, the NAS MUST force the B4 to re-establish the tunnel using the new AFTR name received in the Access-Accept message. If an implementation includes Change-of-Authorization (CoA) messages [RFC 5176], they could be used to modify the current established DS-Lite tunnel. When the NAS receives a CoA Request message Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 7 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 containing the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute, the NAS MUST send a Reconfigure message to a B4 to inform the B4 that the NAS has new or updated configuration parameters and that the B4 is to initiate a Renew/Reply or Information-Request/Reply transaction with the NAS in order to receive the updated information. Upon receiving an AFTR tunnel name different from the currently used one, the B4 MUST terminate the current DS-Lite tunnel, and the B4 MUST establish a new DS-Lite tunnel with the specified AFTR. The DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name RADIUS attribute MAY be present in Accounting-Request records where the Acct-Status-Type is set to Start, Stop, or Interim-Update. The DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name RADIUS attribute MUST NOT appear more than once in a message. A summary of the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name RADIUS attribute format is shown below. The fields are transmitted from left to right. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name (FQDN)... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Type: 144 for DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name. Length: This field indicates the total length in octets of this attribute including the Type and Length fields, and the length in octets of the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name field. DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name: This field contains a single FQDN of the remote tunnel endpoint, located at the DS-Lite AFTR. As the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name attribute is used to populate the DHCPv6 OPTION_AFTR_NAME option, the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name field is formatted as required in DHCPv6 (Section 8 of [RFC 3315] -- "Representation and Use of Domain Names"). Briefly, the format described is using a single octet noting the length of one DNS label (limited to at most 63 octets), followed by the label contents. This repeats until all labels in the FQDN are exhausted, including a terminating zero-length label. Any updates to Section 8 of [RFC 3315] also apply to the encoding of this field. Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 8 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 The data type of the DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name RADIUS attribute is a string with opaque encapsulation, according to Section 5 of [RFC 2865]. 5. Table of Attributes The following tables provide a guide to which attributes may be found in which kinds of packets, and in what quantity. Access- Access- Access- Challenge Accounting # Attribute Request Accept Reject Request 0-1 0-1 0 0 0-1 144 DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name CoA-Request CoA-ACK CoA-NACK # Attribute 0-1 0 0 144 DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name The following table defines the meaning of the above table entries. 0 This attribute MUST NOT be present in the packet. 0+ Zero or more instances of this attribute MAY be present in the packet. 0-1 Zero or one instance of this attribute MAY be present in the packet. 6. Security Considerations This document has no additional security considerations beyond those already identified in [RFC 2865] for the RADIUS protocol and in [RFC 5176] for CoA messages. [RFC 6333] discusses security issues related to Dual-Stack Lite. 7. IANA Considerations Per this document, IANA has allocated a new RADIUS attribute type from the IANA registry "Radius Attribute Types" located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types. DS-Lite-Tunnel-Name - 144 Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 9 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 8. References 8.1. Normative References [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC 2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, June 2000. [RFC 3315] Droms, R., Ed., Bound, J., Volz, B., Lemon, T., Perkins, C., and M. Carney, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)", RFC 3315, July 2003. [RFC 5080] Nelson, D. and A. DeKok, "Common Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Implementation Issues and Suggested Fixes", RFC 5080, December 2007. [RFC 6333] Durand, A., Droms, R., Woodyatt, J., and Y. Lee, "Dual-Stack Lite Broadband Deployments Following IPv4 Exhaustion", RFC 6333, August 2011. [RFC 6334] Hankins, D. and T. Mrugalski, "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Option for Dual-Stack Lite", RFC 6334, August 2011. 8.2. Informative References [RADIUS-IPv6] Lourdelet, B., Dec, W., Ed., Sarikaya, B., Zorn, G., and D. Miles, "RADIUS attributes for IPv6 Access Networks", Work in Progress, November 2011. [RFC 5176] Chiba, M., Dommety, G., Eklund, M., Mitton, D., and B. Aboba, "Dynamic Authorization Extensions to Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 5176, January 2008. Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 10 top

RFC 6519 DS-Lite RADIUS Extensions February 2012 Authors' Addresses Roberta Maglione Telecom Italia Via Reiss Romoli 274 Torino 10148 Italy EMail: roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it Alain Durand Juniper Networks 1194 North Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089-1206 USA EMail: adurand@juniper.net Maglione & Durand Standards Track PAGE 11 top

RFC TOTAL SIZE: 22574 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Tuesday, February 14th, 2012 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 6519: The IETF Trust, Tuesday, February 14th, 2012
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement