The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 6316   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 6316



Last modified on Friday, July 22nd, 2011

Permanent link to RFC 6316
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 6316
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 6316







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                           M. Komu
Request for Comments: 6316                              Aalto University
Category: Informational                                     M. Bagnulo
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                     UC3M
                                                               K. Slavov
                                                        S. Sugimoto, Ed.
                                                                Ericsson
                                                               July 2011


    Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for Multihoming Shim

 Abstract

   This document specifies sockets API extensions for the multihoming
   shim layer.  The API aims to enable interactions between applications
   and the multihoming shim layer for advanced locator management, and
   access to information about failure detection and path exploration.

   This document is based on an assumption that a multihomed host is
   equipped with a conceptual sub-layer (hereafter called "shim sub-
   layer") inside the IP layer that maintains mappings between
   identifiers and locators.  Examples of the shim are Shim6 and the
   Host Identity Protocol (HIP).

 Status of This Memo

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for informational purposes.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
   Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6316.











Komu, et al.                  Informational                  PAGE 1 top


RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 2. Requirements Language ...........................................4 3. Terminology and Background ......................................4 4. System Overview .................................................7 5. Requirements ....................................................8 6. Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer ..................10 6.1. SHIM_ASSOCIATED ...........................................14 6.2. SHIM_DONTSHIM .............................................15 6.3. SHIM_HOT_STANDBY ..........................................16 6.4. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF .......................................17 6.5. SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF ........................................18 6.6. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV .......................................19 6.7. SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV ........................................20 6.8. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND .......................................20 6.9. SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND ........................................22 6.10. SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL .......................................23 6.11. SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER ........................................25 6.12. SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT .........................................26 6.13. SHIM_PATHEXPLORE .........................................27 Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 2 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.14. SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP ..............................28 6.15. Applicability ............................................28 6.16. Error Handling ...........................................29 7. Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer ..................29 7.1. Get Locator from Incoming Packet ..........................30 7.2. Set Locator for Outgoing Packet ...........................30 7.3. Notification from Application to Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer .................................................31 7.4. Applicability .............................................31 8. Data Structures ................................................32 8.1. Data Structure for Locator Information ....................32 8.1.1. Handling Locator behind NAT ........................33 8.2. Path Exploration Parameter ................................34 8.3. Feedback Information ......................................35 9. System Requirements ............................................36 10. Relation to Existing Sockets API Extensions ...................36 11. Operational Considerations ....................................37 11.1. Conflict Resolution ......................................37 11.2. Incompatibility between IPv4 and IPv6 ....................38 12. IANA Considerations ...........................................38 13. Protocol Constant .............................................38 14. Security Considerations .......................................38 14.1. Treatment of Unknown Locator .............................39 14.1.1. Treatment of Unknown Source Locator ...............39 14.1.2. Treatment of Unknown Destination Locator ..........39 15. Acknowledgments ...............................................40 16. References ....................................................40 16.1. Normative References .....................................40 16.2. Informative References ...................................41 Appendix A. Context Forking .......................................42 1. Introduction This document defines sockets API extensions by which upper-layer protocols may be informed about and control the way in which a multihoming shim sub-layer in the IP layer manages the dynamic choice of locators. Initially, the multihoming shim sub-layer refers to Shim6 and/or HIP, but it is defined generically. The role of the multihoming shim sub-layer (hereafter called "shim sub-layer" in this document) is to avoid impacts to upper-layer protocols that may be caused when the endhost changes its attachment point to the Internet -- for instance, in the case of a rehoming event under the multihomed environment. There is, however, a need for an API in the cases where 1) the upper-layer protocol is particularly sensitive to impacts, or 2) the upper-layer protocol wants to benefit from better knowledge of what is going on underneath. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 3 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 There are various kinds of technologies that aim to solve the same issue (the multihoming issue). Note that there will be conflict when more than one shim sub-layer is active at the same time. The assumption made in this document is that there is only a single shim sub-layer (HIP or Shim6) activated on the system. The target readers of this document are application programmers who develop application software that may benefit greatly from multihomed environments. In addition, this document aims to provide necessary information for developers of shim protocols to implement APIs for enabling advanced locator management. 2. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119]. 3. Terminology and Background This section provides terminology used in this document. Basically, most of the terms used in this document are taken from the following documents: o Shim6 Protocol Specification [RFC 5533] o HIP Architecture [RFC 4423] o Reachability Protocol (REAP) [RFC 5534] In this document, the term "IP" refers to both IPv4 and IPv6, unless the protocol version is specifically mentioned. The following are definitions of terms frequently used in this document: o Endpoint Identifier (EID) -- The identifier used by the application to specify the endpoint of a given communication. Applications may handle EIDs in various ways, such as long-lived connections, callbacks, and referrals [SHIM6-APP-REFER]. * In the case of Shim6, an identifier called a ULID (Upper-Layer Identifier) serves as an EID. A ULID is chosen from locators available on the host. * In the case of HIP, an identifier called a Host Identifier serves as an EID. A Host Identifier is derived from the public key of a given host. For the sake of backward compatibility with the sockets API, the Host Identifier is represented in the form of a hash of a public key. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 4 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 * Note that the EID appears in the standard sockets API as an address, and does not appear in the extensions defined in this document, which only concern locators. o Locator - The IP address actually used to deliver IP packets. Locators are present in the source and destination fields of the IP header of a packet on the wire. A locator as discussed in this document could be either an IPv4 address or an IPv6 address. Note that HIP can handle both IPv4 and IPv6 locators, whereas Shim6 can handle only IPv6 locators. For the HIP case, a locator can be a private IPv4 address when the host is behind a NAT. Section 8.1.1 gives a detailed description about the handling of a locator behind a NAT. * List of locators - A list of locators associated with an EID. There are two lists of locators stored in a given context. One is associated with the local EID, and the other is associated with the remote EID. As defined in [RFC 5533], the list of locators associated with an EID 'A' is denoted as Ls(A). * Preferred locator - The (source/destination) locator currently used to send packets within a given context. * Unknown locator - Any locator that does not appear in the locator list of the shim context associated with the socket. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, any source and/or destination locator requested by the application is considered to be an unknown locator. * Valid locator - A valid locator means that the locator is considered to be valid in the security sense. More specifically, the validity indicates whether the locator is part of a Hash-Based Address (HBA) set [RFC 5535]. * Verified locator - A verified locator means that the locator is considered to be reachable according to the result of a REAP return routability check. Note that the verification applies only to the peer's locator. o Shim - The conceptual sub-layer inside the IP layer. This sub- layer maintains mappings between EIDs and locators. An EID can be associated with more than one locator at a time when the host is multihomed. The term "shim" does not refer to a specific protocol but refers to the conceptual sub-layer inside the IP layer. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 5 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 o Identifier/locator adaptation - The adaptation performed at the shim sub-layer. This adaptation may end up re-writing the source and/or destination addresses of an IP packet. In the outbound packet processing, the EID pair is converted to the associated locator pair. In the inbound packet processing, the locator pair is converted to the EID pair. o Context - The state information shared by a given pair of peers. Context stores a binding between the EID and associated locators. Contexts are maintained by the shim sub-layer. Deferred context setup is a scenario where a context is established after the communication starts. Deferred context setup is possible if the ULID is routable, such as in the case of Shim6. o Reachability detection - The procedure to check reachability between a given locator pair. o Path - The sequence of routers that an IP packet goes through to reach the destination. o Path exploration - The procedure to explore available paths for a given set of locator pairs. o Outage - The incident that prevents IP packets flowing from the source locator to the destination locator. When there is an outage, it means that there is no reachability between a given locator pair. The outage may be caused by various reasons, such as a shortage of network resources, congestion, and human error (faulty operation). o Working address pair - Considered to be "working" if the packet can safely travel from the source to the destination, where the packet contains the first address from the pair as the source address and the second address from the pair as the destination address. If reachability is confirmed in both directions, the address pair is considered to be working bi-directionally. o Reachability Protocol (REAP) - The protocol for detecting failure and exploring reachability in a multihomed environment. REAP is defined in [RFC 5534]. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 6 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 In this document, syntax and semantics of the API are given in the same way as in the Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX) standard [POSIX]. The API specifies how to use ancillary data (aka cmsg) to access the locator information with recvmsg() and/or sendmsg() I/O calls. The API is described in C language, and data types are defined in the POSIX format; intN_t means a signed integer of exactly N bits (e.g., int16_t), and uintN_t means an unsigned integer of exactly N bits (e.g., uint32_t). The distinction between "connected" sockets and "unconnected" sockets is important when discussing the applicability of the sockets API defined in this document. A connected socket is bound to a given peer, whereas an unconnected socket is not bound to any specific peers. A TCP socket becomes a connected socket when the TCP connection establishment is completed. UDP sockets are unconnected, unless the application uses the connect() system call. 4. System Overview Figure 1 illustrates the system overview. The shim sub-layer and REAP component exist inside the IP layer. Applications use the sockets API defined in this document to interface with the shim sub-layer and the transport layer for locator management, failure detection, and path exploration. It is also possible that the shim sub-layer interacts with the transport layer; however, such an interaction is outside the scope of this document. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 7 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 +------------------------+ | Application | +------------------------+ ^ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~Socket Interface|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | v +-----------|------------------------------+ | | Transport Layer | +-----------|------------------------------+ ^ | +-------------|-----|-------------------------------------+ | v v | | +-----------------------------+ +----------+ | IP | | Shim |<----->| REAP | | Layer | +-----------------------------+ +----------+ | | ^ ^ | +-----------------------|----------------------|----------+ v v +------------------------------------------+ | Link Layer | +------------------------------------------+ Figure 1: System Overview 5. Requirements The following is a list of requirements from applications: o Turn on/off shim. An application should be able to request to turn on or turn off the multihoming support by the shim layer: * Apply shim. The application should be able to explicitly request that the shim sub-layer apply multihoming support. * Don't apply shim. The application should be able to request that the shim sub-layer not apply the multihoming support but apply normal IP processing at the IP layer. * Note that this function is also required by other types of multihoming mechanisms, such as the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) and multipath TCP, to avoid potential conflict with the shim sub-layer. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 8 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 o Locator management. * It should be possible to set a preferred source and/or destination locator within a given context. * It should be possible to get a preferred source and/or destination locator within a given context. * It should be possible to set a list of source and/or destination locators within a given context: Ls(local) and Ls(remote). * It should be possible to get a list of source and/or destination locators within a given context: Ls(local) and Ls(remote). o Notification from applications and upper-layer protocols to the shim sub-layer about the status of the communication. The notification occurs in an event-based manner. Applications and/or upper-layer protocols may provide positive feedback or negative feedback to the shim sub-layer. Note that these types of feedback are mentioned in [RFC 5534]: * Applications and/or upper-layer protocols (e.g., TCP) may provide positive feedback to the shim sub-layer informing that the communication is going well. * Applications and/or upper-layer protocols (e.g., TCP) may provide negative feedback to the shim sub-layer informing that the communication status is not satisfactory. TCP may detect a problem when it does not receive any expected ACK message from the peer. The REAP module may be triggered by the negative feedback and invoke the path exploration procedure. o Feedback from applications to the shim sub-layer. Applications should be able to inform the shim sub-layer of the timeout values for detecting failures, sending keepalives, and starting the exploration procedure. In particular, applications should be able to suppress keepalives. o Hot-standby. Applications may request the shim sub-layer for a hot-standby capability. This means that alternative paths are known to be working in advance of a failure detection. In such a case, it is possible for the shim sub-layer to immediately replace the current locator pair with an alternative locator pair. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 9 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 o Eagerness for locator exploration. An application should be able to inform the shim sub-layer of how aggressively it wants the REAP mechanism to perform a path exploration (e.g., by specifying the number of concurrent attempts of discovery of working locator pairs) when an outage occurs on the path between the locator pair in use. o Providing locator information to applications. An application should be able to obtain information about the locator pair that was actually used to send or receive packets. * For inbound traffic, the application may be interested in the locator pair that was actually used to receive the packet. * For outbound traffic, the application may be interested in the locator pair that was actually used to transmit the packet. In this way, applications may have additional control of the locator management. For example, an application becomes capable of verifying if its preference for a locator is actually applied to the flow or not. o Applications should be able to know if the shim sub-layer supports deferred context setup or not. o An application should be able to know if the communication is now being served by the shim sub-layer or not. o An application should be able to use a common interface to access an IPv4 locator and an IPv6 locator. 6. Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer In this section, socket options that are specific to the shim sub-layer are defined. Table 1 shows a list of the socket options that are specific to the shim sub-layer. All of these socket options are defined at the level SOL_SHIM. When an application uses one of the socket options by getsockopt() or setsockopt(), the second argument MUST be set to SOL_SHIM. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 10 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 The first column of Table 1 gives the name of the option. The second column indicates whether the value for the socket option can be read by getsockopt(), and the third column indicates whether the value for the socket option can be written by setsockopt(). The fourth column provides a brief description of the socket option. The fifth column shows the type of data structure specified along with the socket option. By default, the data structure type is an integer. +-----------------------------+-----+-----+-----------------+-------+ | optname | get | set | description | dtype | +-----------------------------+-----+-----+-----------------+-------+ | SHIM_ASSOCIATED | o | | Get the | int | | | | | parameter that | | | | | | indicates | | | | | | whether the | | | | | | socket is | | | | | | associated (1) | | | | | | with any shim | | | | | | context or not | | | | | | (0). | | | SHIM_DONTSHIM | o | o | Get or set the | int | | | | | parameter that | | | | | | indicates | | | | | | whether or not | | | | | | to employ | | | | | | multihoming | | | | | | support by the | | | | | | shim sub-layer. | | | SHIM_HOT_STANDBY | o | o | Get or set the | int | | | | | parameter to | | | | | | request the | | | | | | shim sub-layer | | | | | | to prepare a | | | | | | hot-standby | | | | | | connection. | | | SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF | o | o | Set the | Note | | | | | preference | 1 | | | | | value for a | | | | | | source locator | | | | | | for outbound | | | | | | traffic. Get | | | | | | the preferred | | | | | | locator for the | | | | | | source locator | | | | | | for outbound | | | | | | traffic. | | Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 11 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 | SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF | o | o | Set the | Note | | | | | preference | 1 | | | | | value for a | | | | | | destination | | | | | | locator for | | | | | | outbound | | | | | | traffic. Get | | | | | | the preferred | | | | | | locator for the | | | | | | destination | | | | | | locator for | | | | | | outbound | | | | | | traffic. | | | SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV | o | o | Request the | int | | | | | shim sub-layer | | | | | | to store the | | | | | | destination | | | | | | locator of the | | | | | | received IP | | | | | | packet in an | | | | | | ancillary data | | | | | | object. | | | SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV | o | o | Request the | int | | | | | shim sub-layer | | | | | | to store the | | | | | | source locator | | | | | | of the received | | | | | | IP packet in an | | | | | | ancillary data | | | | | | object. | | | SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND | o | o | Get or set the | Note | | | | | source locator | 1 | | | | | of outgoing IP | | | | | | packets. | | | SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND | o | o | Get or set the | Note | | | | | destination | 1 | | | | | locator of | | | | | | outgoing IP | | | | | | packets. | | | SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL | o | o | Get or set the | Note | | | | | list of | 2 | | | | | locators | | | | | | associated with | | | | | | the local EID. | | Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 12 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 | SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER | o | o | Get or set the | Note | | | | | list of | 2 | | | | | locators | | | | | | associated with | | | | | | the peer's EID. | | | SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT | o | o | Get or set the | int | | | | | Send Timeout | | | | | | value of REAP. | | | SHIM_PATHEXPLORE | o | o | Get or set | Note | | | | | parameters for | 3 | | | | | path | | | | | | exploration and | | | | | | failure | | | | | | detection. | | | SHIM_CONTEXT_DEFERRED_SETUP | o | | Get the | int | | | | | parameter that | | | | | | indicates | | | | | | whether | | | | | | deferred | | | | | | context setup | | | | | | is supported or | | | | | | not. | | +-----------------------------+-----+-----+-----------------+-------+ Table 1: Socket Options for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer Note 1: Pointer to a shim_locator as defined in Section 8. Note 2: Pointer to an array of shim_locator data. Note 3: Pointer to a shim_pathexplore as defined in Section 8. Figure 2 illustrates how the shim-specific socket options fit into the system model of sockets API. The figure shows that the shim sub- layer and the additional protocol components (IPv4 and IPv6) below the shim sub-layer are new to the system model. As previously mentioned, all the shim-specific socket options are defined at the SOL_SHIM level. This design choice brings the following advantages: 1. The existing sockets APIs continue to work at the layer above the shim sub-layer. That is, those legacy APIs handle IP addresses as identifiers. 2. With newly defined socket options for the shim sub-layer, the application obtains additional control of locator management. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 13 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 3. The shim-specific socket options can be kept independent from address family (IPPROTO_IP or IPPROTO_IPV6) and transport protocol (IPPROTO_TCP or IPPROTO_UDP) settings. s1 s2 s3 s4 | | | | +----------------|--|-------|--|----------------+ | +-------+ +-------+ | | IPPROTO_TCP | TCP | | UDP | | | +-------+ +-------+ | | | \ / | | | | ----- | | | | / \ | | | +------+ +------+ | | IPPROTO_IP | IPv4 | | IPv6 | IPPROTO_IPV6 | | +------+ +------+ | | \ / SOL_SOCKET | +--------\-------/--------+ | | SOL_SHIM | shim | | | +--------/-------\--------+ | | / \ | | +------+ +------+ | | | IPv4 | | IPv6 | | | +------+ +------+ | | | | | +------------------|----------|-----------------+ | | IPv4 IPv6 Datagram Datagram Figure 2: System Model of Sockets API with Shim Sub-Layer 6.1. SHIM_ASSOCIATED The SHIM_ASSOCIATED option is used to check whether or not the socket is associated with any shim context. This option is meaningful when the locator information of the received IP packet does not tell whether or not the identifier/ locator adaptation is performed. Note that the EID pair and the locator pair may be identical in some cases. Note that the socket option is read-only, and the option value can be read by getsockopt(). The result (0/1/2) is set in the option value (the fourth argument of getsockopt()). When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 14 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 The data type of the option value is an integer. The option value indicates the presence of shim context. A return value of 1 means that the socket is associated with a shim context at the shim sub-layer. A return value of 0 indicates that there is no shim context associated with the socket. A return value of 2 means that it is not known whether or not the socket is associated with a shim context, and this MUST be returned only when the socket is unconnected. In other words, the returned value MUST be 0 or 1 when the socket is connected. For example, the option can be used by the application as follows: int optval; int optlen = sizeof(optval); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_ASSOCIATED, &optval, &optlen); 6.2. SHIM_DONTSHIM The SHIM_DONTSHIM option is used to request that the shim layer not provide the multihoming support for the communication established over the socket. The data type of the option value is an integer, and it takes 0 or 1. An option value of 0 means that the shim sub-layer is employed if available. An option value of 1 means that the application does not want the shim sub-layer to provide the multihoming support for the communication established over the socket. The default value is set to 0, which means that the shim sub-layer performs identifier/locator adaptation if available. Any attempt to disable the multihoming shim support MUST be made by the application before the socket is connected. If an application makes such an attempt for a connected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP MUST be returned. For example, an application can request that the system not apply the multihoming support as follows: int optval; optval = 1; setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DONTSHIM, &optval, sizeof(optval)); Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 15 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 For example, the application can check the option value as follows: int optval; int len; len = sizeof(optval); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DONTSHIM, &optval, &len); 6.3. SHIM_HOT_STANDBY The SHIM_HOT_STANDBY option is used to control whether or not the shim sub-layer employs a hot-standby connection for the socket. A hot-standby connection is an alternative working locator pair to the current locator pair. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is an integer. The option value can be set by setsockopt(). The option value can be read by getsockopt(). By default, the value is set to 0, meaning that hot-standby connection is disabled. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. For example, an application can request establishment of a hot- standby connection by using the socket option as follows: int optval; optval = 1; setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_HOT_STANDBY, &optval, sizeof(optval)); Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 16 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 For example, an application can get the option value by using the socket option as follows: int optval; int len; len = sizeof(optval); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_HOT_STANDBY, &optval, &len); 6.4. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF The SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF option is used to set the preference value for a source locator for outbound traffic, or to get the preference value of the source locator for outbound traffic that has the highest preference value. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled. The preference of a locator is defined by a combination of priority and weight as per DNS SRV [RFC 2782]. Note that the Shim6 base protocol defines the preference of a locator in the same way. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the shim_locator information data structure as defined in Section 8.1. When an application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when the validation of the specified locator fails. An application can set the preference value for a source locator for outbound traffic by setsockopt() with the socket option. Note that lc_ifidx and lc_flags (as defined in Section 8.1) have no effect in a set operation. Below is an example of such a set operation. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 17 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 struct shim_locator lc; struct in6_addr ip6; /* ...set the locator (ip6)... */ memset(&lc, 0, sizeof(shim_locator)); lc.lc_family = AF_INET6; /* IPv6 */ lc.lc_ifidx = 0; lc.lc_flags = 0; lc.lc_prio = 1; lc.lc_weight = 10; memcpy(&lc.lc_addr, &ip6, sizeof(in6_addr)); setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF, &lc, sizeof(optval)); An application can get the source locator for outbound traffic that has the highest preference value by using the socket option. Below is an example of such a get operation. struct shim_locator lc; int len; len = sizeof(lc); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF, &lc, &len); 6.5. SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF The SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF option is used to set the preference value for a destination locator for outbound traffic, or to get the preference value of the destination locator for outbound traffic that has the highest preference value. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled. As defined earlier, the preference of a locator is defined by a combination of priority and weight as per DNS SRV [RFC 2782]. When there is more than one candidate destination locator, the shim sub-layer makes a selection based on the priority and weight specified for each locator. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the shim_locator information data structure as defined in Section 8.1. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 18 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when the validation of the requested locator fails. Error code EUNREACHABLELOCATOR is returned when the requested locator is determined to be unreachable according to a reachability check. The usage of the option is the same as that of SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF. 6.6. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV The SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV option can be used to request that the shim sub-layer store the destination locator of the received IP packet in an ancillary data object that can be accessed by recvmsg(). This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is an integer. The option value MUST be binary (0 or 1). By default, the option value is set to 0, meaning that the option is disabled. An application can set the option value by setsockopt(). An application can get the option value by getsockopt(). See Section 7 for the procedure to access locator information stored in the ancillary data objects. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. For example, an application can request the shim sub-layer to store a destination locator by using the socket option as follows: int optval; optval = 1; setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV, &optval, sizeof(optval)); Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 19 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 For example, an application can get the option value as follows: int optval; int len; len = sizeof(optval); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV, &optval, &len); 6.7. SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV The SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV option is used to request that the shim sub-layer store the source locator of the received IP packet in an ancillary data object that can be accessed by recvmsg(). This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is an integer. The option value MUST be binary (0 or 1). By default, the option value is set to 0, meaning that the option is disabled. The option value can be set by setsockopt(). The option value can be read by getsockopt(). See Section 7 for the procedure to access locator information stored in the ancillary data objects. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. The usage of the option is the same as that of the SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV option. 6.8. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND The SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND option is used to request that the shim sub-layer use a specific locator as the source locator for the IP packets to be sent from the socket. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the shim_locator data structure. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 20 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 An application can set the local locator by setsockopt(), providing a locator that is stored in a shim_locator data structure. When a zero-filled locator is specified, the pre-existing setting of the local locator is inactivated. An application can get the local locator by getsockopt(). When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when an invalid locator is specified. For example, an application can request the shim sub-layer to use a specific local locator by using the socket option as follows: struct shim_locator locator; struct in6_addr ia6; /* an IPv6 address preferred for the source locator is copied to the parameter ia6 */ memset(&locator, 0, sizeof(locator)); /* fill shim_locator data structure */ locator.lc_family = AF_INET6; locator.lc_ifidx = 0; locator.lc_flags = 0; locator.lc_prio = 0; locator.lc_weight = 0; memcpy(&locator.lc_addr, &ia6, sizeof(ia6)); setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND, &locator, sizeof(locator)); For example, an application can get the designated local locator by using the socket option as follows: Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 21 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 struct shim_locator locator; memset(&locator, 0, sizeof(locator)); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND, &locator, sizeof(locator)); /* check locator */ 6.9. SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND The SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND option is used to request that the shim sub-layer use a specific locator for the destination locator of IP packets to be sent from the socket. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the shim_locator data structure. An application can set the remote locator by setsockopt(), providing a locator that is stored in a shim_locator data structure. When a zero-filled locator is specified, the pre-existing setting of the remote locator is inactivated. An application can get the specified remote locator by getsockopt(). The difference between the SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND option and the SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF option is that the former guarantees the use of a requested locator when applicable, whereas the latter does not. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when the validation of the requested locator fails. Error code EUNVERIFIEDLOCATOR is returned when reachability for the requested locator has not been verified yet. Error code EUNREACHABLELOCATOR is returned when the requested locator is determined to be unreachable according to a reachability check. The usage of the option is the same as that of the SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND option. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 22 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.10. SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL The SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL option is used to get or set the locator list associated with the local EID of the shim context associated with the socket. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the buffer in which a locator list is stored. See Section 8 for the data structure for storing the locator information. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled. An application can get the locator list by getsockopt(). Note that the size of the buffer pointed to by the optval argument SHOULD be large enough to store an array of locator information. The number of the locator information is not known beforehand. The local locator list can be set by setsockopt(). The buffer pointed to by the optval argument MUST contain an array of locator structures. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when the validation of any of the specified locators failed. Error code ETOOMANYLOCATORS is returned when the number of locators specified exceeds the limit (SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS), or when the size of the buffer provided by the application is not large enough to store the locator list provided by the shim sub-layer. For example, an application can set a list of locators to be associated with the local EID by using the socket option as follows. Note that an IPv4 locator can be handled by HIP and not by Shim6. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 23 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 struct shim_locator locators[SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS]; struct sockaddr_in *sin; struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6; memset(locators, 0, sizeof(locators)); ... /* obtain local IP addresses from local interfaces */ ... /* first locator (an IPv6 address) */ locators[0].lc_family = AF_INET6; locators[0].lc_ifidx = 0; locators[0].lc_flags = 0; locators[0].lc_prio = 1; locators[0].lc_weight = 0; memcpy(&locators[0].lc_addr, &sa6->sin6_addr, sizeof(sa6->sin6_addr)); ... /* second locator (an IPv4 address) */ locators[1].lc_family = AF_INET; locators[1].lc_ifidx = 0; locators[1].lc_flags = 0; locators[1].lc_prio = 0; locators[1].lc_weight = 0; memcpy(&locators[1].lc_addr, &sa->sin_addr, sizeof(sa->sin_addr)); setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL, locators, sizeof(locators)); For example, an application can get a list of locators that are associated with the local EID by using the socket option as follows: struct shim_locator locators[SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS]; memset(locators, 0, sizeof(locators)); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV, locators, sizeof(locators)); /* parse locators */ ... Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 24 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.11. SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER The SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER option is used to get or set the locator list associated with the peer EID of the shim context associated with the socket. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the buffer where a locator list is stored. See Section 8 for the data structure for storing the locator information. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled. An application can get the locator list by getsockopt(). Note that the size of the buffer pointed to by the optval argument SHOULD be large enough to store an array of locator information. The number of the locator information is not known beforehand. An application can set the locator list by setsockopt(). The buffer pointed to by the optval argument MUST contain an array of locator list items. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when the validation of any of the specified locators failed. Error code EUNVERIFIEDLOCATOR is returned when reachability for the requested locator has not been verified yet. Error code EUNREACHABLELOCATOR is returned when the requested locator is determined to be unreachable according to a reachability check. Error code ETOOMANYLOCATORS is returned when the number of locators specified exceeds the limit (SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS), or when the size of the buffer provided by the application is not large enough to store the locator list provided by the shim sub-layer. The usage of the option is the same as that of SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 25 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.12. SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT The SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT option is used to get or set the Send Timeout value of REAP [RFC 5534]. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is an integer. The value indicates the period of timeout in seconds to send a REAP Keepalive message since the last outbound traffic. By default, the option value is set to 0, meaning that the option is disabled. When the option is disabled, the REAP mechanism follows its default Send Timeout value as specified in [RFC 5534]. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. When there is no REAP instance on the system, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. For example, an application can set the timeout value by using the socket option as follows: int optval; optval = 15; /* 15 seconds */ setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT, &optval, sizeof(optval)); For example, an application can get the timeout value by using the socket option as follows: int optval; int len; len = sizeof(optval); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_APP_TIMEOUT, &optval, &len); Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 26 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.13. SHIM_PATHEXPLORE The application MAY use this socket option to get or set parameters concerning path exploration. Path exploration is a procedure to find an alternative locator pair to the current locator pair. As the REAP specification defines, a peer may send Probe messages to find an alternative locator pair. This option is effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. The data type of the option value is a pointer to the buffer where a set of information for path exploration is stored. The data structure is defined in Section 8. By default, the option value is set to NULL, meaning that the option is disabled. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. For example, an application can set parameters for path exploration by using the socket option as follows: struct shim6_pathexplore pe; pe.pe_probenum = 4; /* times */ pe.pe_keepaliveto = 10; /* seconds */ pe.pe_initprobeto = 500; /* milliseconds */ pe.pe_reserved = 0; setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_PATHEXPLORE, &pe, sizeof(pe)); For example, an application can get parameters for path exploration by using the socket option as follows: struct shim6_pathexplore pe; int len; len = sizeof(pe); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_PATHEXPLORE, &pe, &len); Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 27 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.14. SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP The SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP option is used to check whether or not deferred context setup is possible. Deferred context setup means that the context is established in parallel with the data communication. Note that Shim6 supports deferred context setup and HIP does not, because EIDs in HIP (i.e., Host Identifiers) are non- routable. Note that the socket option is read-only, and the option value can be read by getsockopt(). The data type for the option value is an integer. The option value MUST be binary (0 or 1). The option value of 1 means that the shim sub-layer supports deferred context setup. When the application specifies the socket option to an unconnected socket, error code EOPNOTSUPP is returned to the application. For example, an application can check whether deferred context setup is possible or not as follows: int optval; int len; len = sizeof(optval); getsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_DEFERRED_CONTEXT_SETUP, &optval, &len); 6.15. Applicability All the socket options defined in this section except for the SHIM_DONTSHIM option are applicable to applications that use connected sockets. All the socket options defined in this section except for the SHIM_ASSOCIATED, SHIM_DONTSHIM, and SHIM_CONTEXT_DEFERRED_SETUP options are effective only when there is a shim context associated with the socket. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 28 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 6.16. Error Handling If successful, getsockopt() and setsockopt() return 0; otherwise, the functions return -1 and set errno to indicate an error. The following are new error values defined for some shim-specific socket options indicating that the getsockopt() or setsockopt() finished incompletely: EINVALIDLOCATOR This indicates that the locator is not part of the HBA set [RFC 5535] within the shim context associated with the socket. EUNVERIFIEDLOCATOR This indicates that the reachability of the locator has not been confirmed. This error is applicable to only the peer's locator. EUNREACHABLELOCATOR This indicates that the locator is not reachable according to the result of the reachability check. This error is applicable to only the peer's locator. 7. Ancillary Data for Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer This section provides definitions of ancillary data to be used for locator management and notification from/to the shim sub-layer to/ from the application. When the application performs locator management by sendmsg() or recvmsg(), a member of the msghdr structure (given in Figure 3) called msg_control holds a pointer to the buffer in which one or more shim-specific ancillary data objects may be stored. An ancillary data object can store a single locator. It should be possible to process the shim-specific ancillary data object by the existing macros defined in the POSIX standard and [RFC 3542]. struct msghdr { caddr_t msg_name; /* optional address */ u_int msg_namelen; /* size of address */ struct iovec *msg_iov; /* scatter/gather array */ u_int msg_iovlen; /* # elements in msg_iov */ caddr_t msg_control; /* ancillary data, see below */ u_int msg_controllen; /* ancillary data buffer len */ int msg_flags; /* flags on received message */ }; Figure 3: msghdr Structure Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 29 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 In the case of an unconnected socket, msg_name stores the socket address of the peer. Note that the address is not a locator of the peer but the identifier of the peer. SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV can be used to get the locator of the peer node. Table 2 is a list of the shim-specific ancillary data that can be used for locator management by recvmsg() or sendmsg(). In any case, the value of cmsg_level MUST be set to SOL_SHIM. +---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------------+ | cmsg_type | sendmsg() | recvmsg() | cmsg_data[] | +---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------------+ | SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV | | o | Note 1 | | SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV | | o | Note 1 | | SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND | o | | Note 1 | | SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND | o | | Note 1 | | SHIM_FEEDBACK | o | | shim_feedback{} | +---------------------+-----------+-----------+-----------------+ Table 2: Shim-Specific Ancillary Data Note 1: cmsg_data[] within msg_control includes a single sockaddr_in{} or sockaddr_in6{} and padding if necessary 7.1. Get Locator from Incoming Packet An application can get locator information from the received IP packet by specifying the shim-specific socket options for the socket. When SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV and/or SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV socket options are set, the application can retrieve a local and/or remote locator from the ancillary data. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, the shim sub-layer MUST return zero-filled locator information to the application. 7.2. Set Locator for Outgoing Packet An application can specify the locators to be used for transmitting an IP packet by sendmsg(). When the ancillary data of cmsg_type SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND and/or SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND are specified, the application can explicitly specify the source and/or the destination locators to be used for the communication over the socket. If the specified locator pair is verified, the shim sub-layer overrides the locator(s) of the outgoing IP packet. Note that the effect is limited to the datagram transmitted by the sendmsg(). Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 30 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. Error code EINVALIDLOCATOR is returned when validation of the specified locator fails. Error code EUNVERIFIEDLOCATOR is returned when reachability for the requested locator has not been verified yet. The application is recommended to use another destination locator until the reachability check for the requested locator is done. Error code EUNREACHABLELOCATOR is returned when the requested locator is determined to be unreachable according to a reachability check. The application is recommended to use another destination locator when receiving the error. 7.3. Notification from Application to Multihoming Shim Sub-Layer An application MAY provide feedback to the shim sub-layer about the communication status. Such feedback is useful for the shim sub-layer to monitor the reachability status of the currently used locator pair in a given shim context. The notification can be made by sendmsg() specifying a new ancillary data called SHIM_FEEDBACK. The ancillary data can be handled by specifying the SHIM_FEEDBACK option in cmsg_type. When there is no shim context associated with the socket, error code ENOENT is returned to the application. See Section 8.3 for details of the data structure to be used. It is outside the scope of this document to describe how the shim sub-layer would react when feedback is provided by an application. 7.4. Applicability All the ancillary data for the shim sub-layer is applicable to connected sockets. Care is needed when the SHIM_LOC_*_RECV socket option is used for stream-oriented sockets (e.g., TCP sockets) because there is no one- to-one mapping between a single send or receive operation and the data (e.g., a TCP segment) being received. In other words, there is Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 31 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 no guarantee that the locator(s) set in the SHIM_LOC_*_RECV ancillary data is identical to the locator(s) that appears in the IP packets received. The shim sub-layer SHOULD provide the latest locator information to the application in response to the SHIM_LOC_*_RECV socket option. 8. Data Structures This section gives data structures for the shim sub-layer. These data structures are either used as a parameter for setsockopt() or getsockopt() (as mentioned in Section 6), or as a parameter for ancillary data to be processed by sendmsg() or recvmsg() (as mentioned in Section 7). 8.1. Data Structure for Locator Information As defined in Section 6, the SHIM_LOC_*_PREF, SHIM_LOC_*_SEND, and SHIM_LOCLIST_* socket options need to handle one or more locator information points. Locator information includes not only the locator itself but also additional information about the locator that is useful for locator management. A new data structure is defined to serve as a placeholder for the locator information. Figure 4 illustrates the data structure called shim_locator, which stores locator information. struct shim_locator { uint8_t lc_family; /* address family */ uint8_t lc_proto; /* protocol */ uint16_t lc_port; /* port number */ uint16_t lc_prio; /* preference value */ uint16_t lc_weight; /* weight */ uint32_t lc_ifidx; /* interface index */ struct in6_addr lc_addr; /* address */ uint16_t lc_flags; /* flags */ }; Figure 4: Shim Locator Structure lc_family Address family of the locator (e.g., AF_INET, AF_INET6). It is required that the parameter contains a non-zero value indicating the exact address family of the locator. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 32 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 lc_proto Internet Protocol number for the protocol that is used to handle a locator behind a NAT. The value MUST be set to zero when there is no NAT involved. When the locator is behind a NAT, the value MUST be set to IPPROTO_UDP. lc_port Port number that is used for handling a locator behind a NAT. lc_prio Priority of the locator. The range is 0-65535. The lowest priority value means the highest priority. lc_weight Weight value indicates a relative weight for locators with the same priority value. The range is 0-65535. A locator with higher weight value is prioritized over the other locators with lower weight values. lc_ifidx Interface index of the network interface to which the locator is assigned. This field is applicable only to local locators, and has no effect in set operations. lc_addr Contains the locator. In the case of IPv4, the locator MUST be formatted in the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address as defined in [RFC 4291]. The locator MUST be stored in network byte order. lc_flags Each bit of the flags represents a specific characteristic of the locator. The Hash-Based Address (HBA) is defined as 0x01. The Cryptographically Generated Address (CGA) is defined as 0x02. This field has no effect in set operations. 8.1.1. Handling Locator behind NAT Note that the locator information MAY contain a locator behind a Network Address Translator (NAT). Such a situation may arise when the host is behind the NAT and uses a local address as a source locator to communicate with the peer. Note that a NAT traversal mechanism for HIP is defined, which allows a HIP host to tunnel control and data traffic over UDP [RFC 5770]. Note also that the locator behind a NAT is not necessarily an IPv4 address and can be an IPv6 address. Below is an example where the application sets a UDP encapsulation interface as a source locator when sending IP packets. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 33 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 struct shim_locator locator; struct in6_addr ia6; /* copy the private IPv4 address to the ia6 as an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address */ memset(&locator, 0, sizeof(locator)); /* fill shim_locator data structure */ locator.lc_family = AF_INET; locator.lc_proto = IPPROTO_UDP; locator.lc_port = 50500; locator.lc_ifidx = 0; locator.lc_flags = 0; locator.lc_prio = 0; locator.lc_weight = 0; memcpy(&locator.lc_addr, &ia6, sizeof(ia6)); setsockopt(fd, SOL_SHIM, SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND, &locator, sizeof(locator)); Figure 5: Handling Locator behind NAT 8.2. Path Exploration Parameter As defined in Section 6, SHIM_PATHEXPLORE allows an application to set or read the parameters for path exploration and failure detection. A new data structure called shim_pathexplore is defined to store the necessary parameters. Figure 6 illustrates the data structure. The data structure can be passed to getsockopt() or setsockopt() as an argument. struct shim_pathexplore { uint16_t pe_probenum; /* # of initial probes */ uint16_t pe_keepaliveto; /* Keepalive Timeout */ uint16_t pe_keepaliveint; /* Keepalive Interval */ uint16_t pe_initprobeto; /* Initial Probe Timeout */ uint32_t pe_reserved; /* reserved */ }; Figure 6: Path Explore Structure Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 34 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 pe_probenum Indicates the number of initial Probe messages to be sent. The value MUST be set as per [RFC 5534]. pe_keepaliveto Indicates the timeout value in seconds for detecting a failure when the host does not receive any packets for a certain period of time while there is outbound traffic. When the timer expires, the path exploration procedure will be carried out by sending a REAP Probe message. The value MUST be set as per [RFC 5534]. pe_keepaliveint Indicates the interval of REAP Keepalive messages in seconds to be sent by the host when there is no outbound traffic to the peer host. The value MUST be set as per [RFC 5534]. pe_initprobeto Indicates the retransmission timer of the REAP Probe message in milliseconds. Note that this timer is applied before exponential back-off is started. A REAP Probe message for the same locator pair may be retransmitted. The value MUST be set as per [RFC 5534]. pe_reserved A reserved field for future extension. By default, the field MUST be initialized to zero. 8.3. Feedback Information As mentioned in Section 7.3, applications can inform the shim sub-layer about the status of unicast reachability of the locator pair currently in use. The feedback information can be handled by using ancillary data called SHIM_FEEDBACK. A new data structure named shim_feedback is illustrated in Figure 7. struct shim_feedback { uint8_t fb_direction; /* direction of traffic */ uint8_t fb_indicator; /* indicator (1-3) */ uint16_t fb_reserved; /* reserved */ }; Figure 7: Feedback Information Structure Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 35 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 fb_direction Indicates the direction of reachability between the locator pair in question. A value of 0 indicates outbound direction, and a value of 1 indicates inbound direction. fb_indicator A value indicating the degree of satisfaction of a unidirectional reachability for a given locator pair. * 0: Default value. Whenever this value is specified, the feedback information MUST NOT be processed by the shim sub-layer. * 1: Unable to connect. There is no unidirectional reachability between the locator pair in question. * 2: Unsatisfactory. The application is not satisfied with the unidirectional reachability between the locator pair in question. * 3: Satisfactory. There is satisfactory unidirectional reachability between the locator pair in question. fb_reserved Reserved field. MUST be ignored by the receiver. 9. System Requirements As addressed in Section 6, most of the socket options and ancillary data defined in this document are applicable to connected sockets. It is assumed that the kernel is capable of maintaining the association between a connected socket and a shim context. This requirement is considered to be reasonable because a pair of source and destination IP addresses is bound to a connected socket. 10. Relation to Existing Sockets API Extensions This section explains the relation between the sockets API defined in this document and the existing sockets API extensions. As mentioned in Section 6, the basic assumption is that the existing sockets API continues to work above the shim sub-layer. This means that the existing sockets API deals with identifiers, and the sockets API defined in this document deals with locators. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 36 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND and SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND socket options are semantically similar to the IPV6_PKTINFO sockets API in the sense that both provide a means for an application to set the source IP address of outbound IP packets. SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_RECV and SHIM_LOC_PEER_RECV socket options are semantically similar to the IP_RECVDSTADDR and IPV6_PKTINFO sockets APIs in the sense that both provide a means for an application to get the source and/or destination IP address of inbound IP packets. getsockname() and getpeername() enable an application to get the "name" of the communication endpoints, which is represented by a pair of IP addresses and port numbers assigned to the socket. getsockname() gives the IP address and port number assigned to the socket on the local side, and getpeername() gives the IP address and port number of the peer side. 11. Operational Considerations This section gives operational considerations of the sockets API defined in this document. 11.1. Conflict Resolution There can be a conflicting situation when different applications specify different preferences for the same shim context. For instance, suppose that applications A and B establish communication with the same EID pair while both applications have different preferences in their choice of local locator. The notion of context forking in Shim6 can resolve the conflicting situation. It is possible that socket options defined in Section 6 cause a conflicting situation when the target context is shared by multiple applications. In such a case, the socket handler should inform the shim sub-layer that context forking is required. In Shim6, when a context is forked, a unique identifier called the Forked Instance Identifier (FII) is assigned to the newly forked context. The forked context is then exclusively associated with the socket through which a non-default preference value was specified. The forked context is maintained by the shim sub-layer during the lifetime of the associated socket instance. When the socket is closed, the shim sub-layer SHOULD delete the associated context. When the application specifies SHIM_LOC_*_SEND specifying a different source or destination locator that does not have the highest priority and weight specified by the SHIM_LOC_*_PREF, the shim sub-layer SHOULD supersede the request made by SHIM_LOC_*_SEND over the preference specified by SHIM_LOC_*_PREF. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 37 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 When the peer provides preferences of the locators (e.g., a Shim6 peer sends a locator with a Locator Preferences Option) that conflict with preferences specified by the applications either by SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND or SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF, the shim sub-layer SHOULD supersede the preferences made by the applications over the preferences specified by the peer. 11.2. Incompatibility between IPv4 and IPv6 The shim sub-layer performs identifier/locator adaptation. Therefore, in some cases, the whole IP header can be replaced with a new IP header of a different address family (e.g., conversion from IPv4 to IPv6 or vice versa). Hence, there is an issue regarding how to make the conversion with minimum impact. Note that this issue is common in other protocol conversion techniques [RFC 2765] [RFC 6145]. As studied in the previous works on protocol conversion [RFC 2765], [RFC 6145] some of the features (IPv6 routing headers, hop-by-hop extension headers, and destination headers) from IPv6 are not convertible to IPv4. In addition, the notion of source routing is not exactly the same in IPv4 and IPv6. This means that an error may occur during the conversion of the identifier and locator. It is outside the scope of this document to describe how the shim sub-layer should behave in such erroneous cases. 12. IANA Considerations There are no IANA considerations for the socket options (SHIM_*), the ancillary data, and the socket level (SOL_SHIM) that are defined in this document. All the numbers concerned are not under the control of the IETF or IANA, but they are platform-specific. 13. Protocol Constant This section defines a protocol constant. SHIM_MAX_LOCATORS The maximum number of locators to be included in a locator list. The value is set to 32. 14. Security Considerations This section gives security considerations of the API defined in this document. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 38 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 14.1. Treatment of Unknown Locator When sending IP packets, there is a possibility that an application will request the use of an unknown locator for the source and/or destination locators. Note that the treatment of an unknown locator can be a subject of security considerations, because the use of an invalid source and/or destination locator may cause a redirection attack. 14.1.1. Treatment of Unknown Source Locator The shim sub-layer checks to determine if the requested locator is available on any local interface. If not, the shim sub-layer MUST reject the request and return an error message with the EINVALIDLOCATOR code to the application. If the locator is confirmed to be available, the shim sub-layer SHOULD initiate the procedure to update the locator list. Use of the following socket options and ancillary data requires treatment of an unknown source locator: o SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_SEND o SHIM_LOC_LOCAL_PREF o SHIM_LOCLIST_LOCAL 14.1.2. Treatment of Unknown Destination Locator If the shim sub-layer turns out to be Shim6, the Shim6 layer MUST reject the request for using an unknown destination locator. If the shim sub-layer turns out to be HIP, the HIP layer MUST reject the request for using an unknown destination locator. There is, however, an exceptional case where the HIP layer SHOULD accept the request, provided that the HIP association is in the UNASSOCIATED state. Details of locator handling in HIP are described in Section 4.6 of [RFC 6317]. Use of the following socket options and ancillary data requires treatment of an unknown destination locator: o SHIM_LOC_PEER_SEND o SHIM_LOC_PEER_PREF o SHIM_LOCLIST_PEER Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 39 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 15. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Jari Arkko, who participated in the discussion that led to the first version of this document, and Tatuya Jinmei, who thoroughly reviewed the early draft version of this document and provided detailed comments on sockets API-related issues. Thomas Henderson provided valuable comments, especially from the HIP perspective. The authors sincerely thank the following people for their helpful comments regarding the document: Samu Varjonen, Dmitriy Kuptsov, Brian Carpenter, Michael Scharf, Sebastien Barre, and Roni Even. 16. References 16.1. Normative References [POSIX] "IEEE Std. 1003.1-2008 Standard for Information Technology -- Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX). Open group Technical Standard: Base Specifications, Issue 7", September 2008, <http://www.opengroup.org/austin>. [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC 3542] Stevens, W., Thomas, M., Nordmark, E., and T. Jinmei, "Advanced Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for IPv6", RFC 3542, May 2003. [RFC 4423] Moskowitz, R. and P. Nikander, "Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Architecture", RFC 4423, May 2006. [RFC 5533] Nordmark, E. and M. Bagnulo, "Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6", RFC 5533, June 2009. [RFC 5534] Arkko, J. and I. van Beijnum, "Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming", RFC 5534, June 2009. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 40 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 16.2. Informative References [RFC 2765] Nordmark, E., "Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm (SIIT)", RFC 2765, February 2000. [RFC 2782] Gulbrandsen, A., Vixie, P., and L. Esibov, "A DNS RR for specifying the location of services (DNS SRV)", RFC 2782, February 2000. [RFC 4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006. [RFC 5535] Bagnulo, M., "Hash-Based Addresses (HBA)", RFC 5535, June 2009. [RFC 5770] Komu, M., Henderson, T., Tschofenig, H., Melen, J., and A. Keranen, Ed., "Basic Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Extensions for Traversal of Network Address Translators", RFC 5770, April 2010. [RFC 6145] Li, X., Bao, C., and F. Baker, "IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm", RFC 6145, April 2011. [RFC 6317] Komu, M. and T. Henderson, "Basic Socket Interface Extensions for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP)", RFC 6317, July 2011. [SHIM6-APP-REFER] Nordmark, E., "Shim6 Application Referral Issues", Work in Progress, July 2005. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 41 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 Appendix A. Context Forking In this section, an issue concerning context forking and its relation to the multihoming shim API are discussed. Shim6 supports the notion of context forking. A peer may decide to fork a context for a certain reason (e.g., an upper-layer protocol prefers to use a different locator pair than the one defined in an available context). The procedure of context forking is done similarly to the normal context establishment, performing the 4-way message exchange. A peer who has decided to fork a context initiates the context establishment. Hereafter, we call this peer the "initiator". The peer of the initiator is called the "responder". Once the forked context is established between the peers, on the initiator side, it is possible to apply forked context to the packet flow, since the system maintains an association between the forked context and the socket owned by the application that has requested the context forking. How this association is maintained is an implementation-specific issue. However, on the responder side, there is a question of how the outbound packet can be multiplexed by the shim sub-layer, because there is more than one Shim6 context that matches with the ULID pair of the packet flow. There is a need to differentiate packet flows not only by the ULID pairs but by some other information and associate a given packet flow with a specific context. Figure 8 gives an example of a scenario where two communicating peers fork a context. Initially, there has been a single transaction between the peers, by the application 1 (App1). Accordingly, another transaction is started, by application 2 (App2). Both of the transactions are made based on the same ULID pair. The first context pair (Ctx1) is established for the transaction of App1. Given the requests from App2, the shim sub-layer on Peer 1 decides to fork a context. Accordingly, a forked context (Ctx2) is established between the peers, which should be exclusively applied to the transaction of App2. Ideally, multiplexing and demultiplexing of packet flows that relate to App1 and App2 should be done as illustrated in Figure 8. However, as mentioned earlier, the responder needs to multiplex outbound flows of App1 and App2 somehow. Note that if a context forking occurs on the initiator side, a context forking needs to also occur on the responder side. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 42 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 Peer 1 Peer 2 (initiator) (responder) +----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ |App1| |App2| |App1| |App2| +----+ +----+ +----+ +----+ |^ |^ ^| ^| v| v| |v |v -----S1-------------S2----- -----S1-------------S2----- || || || || || || || || Ctx1 Ctx2 Ctx1 Ctx2 ULID:<A1,B1> ULID:<A1,B1> ULID:<B1,A1> ULID:<B1,A1> Loc: <A1,B2> Loc: <A1,B3> Loc: <B2,A1> Loc: <B3,A1> FII: 0 FII: 100 FII: 0 FII: 100 |^ |^ ^| ^| || || || || || || || || \..............||....................../| || \.............||......................./ || || || \|...................................../| \....................................../ Figure 8: Context Forking How to solve the issue described above is a topic for further study. Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 43 top

RFC 6316 Multihoming Shim API July 2011 Authors' Addresses Miika Komu Aalto University Espoo Finland Phone: +358505734395 Fax: +358947025014 EMail: miika@iki.fi URI: http://cse.aalto.fi/research/groups/datacommunications/people/ Marcelo Bagnulo Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Av. Universidad 30 Leganes 28911 SPAIN Phone: +34 91 6248837 EMail: marcelo@it.uc3m.es URI: http://it.uc3m.es/marcelo Kristian Slavov Ericsson Research Nomadiclab Hirsalantie 11 Jorvas FI-02420 Finland Phone: +358 9 299 3286 EMail: kristian.slavov@ericsson.com Shinta Sugimoto (editor) Nippon Ericsson K.K. Koraku Mori Building 1-4-14, Koraku, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 112-0004 Japan Phone: +81 3 3830 2241 EMail: shinta.sugimoto@ericsson.com Komu, et al. Informational PAGE 44 top

RFC TOTAL SIZE: 93076 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Friday, July 22nd, 2011 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 6316: The IETF Trust, Friday, July 22nd, 2011
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement