|
|
|
|
|
|
IETF RFC 6304
Last modified on Thursday, July 14th, 2011
 Permanent link to RFC 6304
 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 6304
 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 6304
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) J. Abley
Request for Comments: 6304 ICANN
Category: Informational W. Maton
ISSN: 2070-1721 NRC-CNRC
July 2011
AS112 Nameserver Operations
 Abstract
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC 1918 for private use within individual sites.
Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name
System (DNS) queries (so-called "reverse lookups") corresponding to
those private-use addresses. Since the addresses concerned have only
local significance, it is good practice for site administrators to
ensure that such queries are answered locally. However, it is not
uncommon for such queries to follow the normal delegation path in the
public DNS instead of being answered within the site.
It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to
such queries. In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use
addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of
such queries is large and growing. The AS112 project aims to provide
a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on
the IN-ADDR.ARPA authoritative servers. The AS112 project is named
after the Autonomous System Number (ASN) that was assigned to it.
This document describes the steps required to install a new AS112
node and offers advice relating to such a node's operation.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents
approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 1 
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6304.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF
Contributions published or made publicly available before November
10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this
material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow
modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process.
Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling
the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified
outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may
not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format
it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other
than English.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 2
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. AS112 DNS Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Nameservers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Installation of a New Node . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. Useful Background Knowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Topological Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.3. Operating System and Host Considerations . . . . . . . . . 5
3.4. Routing Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.5. DNS Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.6. Testing a Newly Installed Node . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4. Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.1. Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.2. Downtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.3. Statistics and Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5. Communications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6. On the Future of AS112 Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Appendix A. History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1. Introduction
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
[RFC 1918] for private use within individual sites.
Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name
System (DNS) [RFC 1034] queries (so-called "reverse lookups")
corresponding to those private-use addresses. Since the addresses
concerned have only local significance, it is good practice for site
administrators to ensure that such queries are answered locally
[RFC 6303]. However, it is not uncommon for such queries to follow
the normal delegation path in the public DNS instead of being
answered within the site.
It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to
such queries. In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use
addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of
such queries is large and growing. The AS112 project aims to provide
a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on
the IN-ADDR.ARPA authoritative servers [RFC 5855].
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 3
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
The AS112 project encompasses a loosely coordinated collection of
independently operated nameservers. Each nameserver functions as a
single node in an AS112 anycast cloud [RFC 4786] and is configured to
answer authoritatively for a particular set of nominated zones.
The AS112 project is named after the Autonomous System Number (ASN)
that was assigned to it.
2. AS112 DNS Service
2.1. Zones
AS112 nameservers answer authoritatively for the following zones,
corresponding to [RFC 1918] private-use netblocks:
o 10.IN-ADDR.ARPA
o 16.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, 17.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA, ..., 31.172.IN-ADDR.ARPA
o 168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA
and the following zone, corresponding to the "link local" netblock
169.254.0.0/16 listed in [RFC 5735]:
o 254.169.IN-ADDR.ARPA
To aid identification of AS112 anycast nodes, each node also answers
authoritatively for the zone HOSTNAME.AS112.NET.
See Section 3.5 for the recommended contents of all these zones.
It is possible that other zones corresponding to private-use
infrastructure will be delegated to AS112 servers in the future. A
list of zones for which AS112 servers answer authoritatively is
maintained at <http://www.as112.net/>.
2.2. Nameservers
The zones listed in Section 2.1 are delegated to the two nameservers
BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG (192.175.48.6) and BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
(192.175.48.42).
Additionally, the server PRISONER.IANA.ORG (192.175.48.1) is listed
in the MNAME field of the SOA records of the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones
served by AS112 nameservers. PRISONER.IANA.ORG receives mainly
dynamic update queries.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 4
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
The addresses of all these nameservers are covered by the single IPv4
prefix 192.175.48.0/24.
3. Installation of a New Node
3.1. Useful Background Knowledge
Installation of an AS112 node is relatively straightforward.
However, experience in the following general areas may prove useful:
o inter-domain routing with BGP [RFC 4271];
o DNS authoritative server operations; and
o anycast [RFC 4786] distribution of DNS services.
3.2. Topological Location
AS112 nodes may be located anywhere on the Internet. For nodes that
are intended to provide a public service to the Internet community
(as opposed to private use), it may well be advantageous to choose a
location that is easily (and cheaply) reachable by multiple
providers, such as an Internet Exchange Point.
AS112 nodes may advertise their service prefix to BGP peers for local
use (analogous to a conventional peering relationship between two
providers) or for global use (analogous to a customer relationship
with one or more providers).
It is good operational practice to notify the community of users that
may fall within the reach of a new AS112 node before it is installed.
At an Internet Exchange, local mailing lists usually exist to
facilitate such announcements. For nodes that are intended to be
globally reachable, coordination with other AS112 operators is highly
recommended. See also Section 5.
3.3. Operating System and Host Considerations
Examples in this document are based on UNIX and UNIX-like operating
systems, but other operating systems exist that are suitable for use
in construction of an AS112 node.
The chosen platform should include either support for cloned loopback
interfaces or the capability to bind multiple addresses to a single
loopback interface. The addresses of the nameservers listed in
Section 2.2 will be configured on these interfaces in order that the
DNS software can respond to queries properly.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 5
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
A host that is configured to act as an AS112 anycast node should be
dedicated to that purpose and should not be used to simultaneously
provide other services. This guidance is provided due to the
unpredictable (and occasionally high) traffic levels that AS112 nodes
have been seen to attract.
System startup scripts should be arranged such that the various
AS112-related components start automatically following a system
reboot. The order in which interfaces are configured and software
components started should be arranged such that routing software
startup follows DNS software startup, and DNS software startup
follows loopback interface configuration.
Wrapper scripts or other arrangements should be employed to ensure
that the anycast service prefix for AS112 is not advertised while
either the anycast addresses are not configured or the DNS software
is not running.
3.4. Routing Software
AS112 nodes signal the availability of AS112 nameservers to the
Internet using BGP [RFC 4271]: each AS112 node is a BGP speaker and
announces the prefix 192.175.48.0/24 to the Internet with origin AS
112 (see also Section 2.2).
The examples in this document are based on the Quagga Routing Suite
[QUAGGA] running on Linux, but other software packages exist that
also provide suitable BGP support for AS112 nodes.
The "bgpd.conf" file is used by Quagga's bgpd daemon, which provides
BGP support. The router ID in this example is 203.0.113.1; the AS112
node peers with external peers 192.0.2.1 and 192.0.2.2. Note the
local AS number is 112, and the service prefix originated from the
AS112 node is 192.175.48.0/24.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 6
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
! bgpd.conf
!
hostname as112-bgpd
password <something>
enable password <supersomething>
!
! Note that all AS112 nodes use the local Autonomous System
! Number 112, and originate the IPv4 prefix 192.175.48.0/24.
! All other addresses shown below are illustrative, and
! actual numbers will depend on local circumstances.
!
router bgp 112
bgp router-id 203.0.113.1
network 192.175.48.0
neighbor 192.0.2.1 remote-as 64496
neighbor 192.0.2.1 next-hop-self
neighbor 192.0.2.1 prefix-list AS112 out
neighbor 192.0.2.1 filter-list 1 out
neighbor 192.0.2.2 remote-as 64497
neighbor 192.0.2.2 next-hop-self
neighbor 192.0.2.2 prefix-list AS112 out
neighbor 192.0.2.2 filter-list 1 out
!
ip prefix-list AS112 permit 192.175.48.0/24
!
ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$
The configuration above includes a double-blinded restriction on what
the AS112 node shall advertise to the pair of BGP neighbors.
Firstly, that prefix-list "AS112" only containing the service prefix
192.175.48.0/24 shall be advertised. Secondly, the "ip as-path
access-list 1" statement contains a one-line regular expression that
permits only the local AS number (112 in this case) and no other to
be advertised as well. Both statements prevent the node from
becoming a transit router. Equivalent restrictions using other BGP
implementations should be utilised.
The "zebra.conf" file is required to provide integration between
protocol daemons (bgpd, in this case) and the kernel.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 7
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
! zebra.conf
!
hostname as112
password <something>
enable password <supersomething>
!
interface lo
!
interface eth0
!
3.5. DNS Software
Although the queries received by AS112 nodes are definitively
misdirected, it is important that they be answered in a manner that
is accurate and consistent. For this reason, AS112 nodes operate as
fully functional and standards-compliant DNS authoritative servers
[RFC 1034], and hence require DNS software.
Examples in this document are based on ISC BIND9 [BIND], but other
DNS software exists that is suitable for use in construction of an
AS112 node.
The following is a sample BIND9 "named.conf" file for a dedicated
AS112 server. Note that the nameserver is configured to act as an
authoritative-only server (i.e., recursion is disabled). The
nameserver is also configured to listen on the various AS112 anycast
nameserver addresses, as well as its local addresses.
// named.conf
// global options
options {
listen-on {
127.0.0.1; // localhost
// The following address is node-dependent and should be set to
// something appropriate for the new AS112 node.
203.0.113.1; // local address (globally unique, unicast)
// the following addresses correspond to AS112 addresses, and
// are the same for all AS112 nodes
192.175.48.1; // prisoner.iana.org (anycast)
192.175.48.6; // blackhole-1.iana.org (anycast)
192.175.48.42; // blackhole-2.iana.org (anycast)
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 8
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
};
directory "/var/named";
recursion no; // authoritative-only server
query-source address *;
};
// Log queries, so that when people call us about unexpected
// answers to queries they didn't realise they had sent, we
// have something to talk about. Note that activating this
// has the potential to create high CPU load and consume
// enormous amounts of disk space.
logging {
channel "querylog" {
file "/var/log/query.log" versions 2 size 500m;
print-time yes;
};
category queries { querylog; };
};
// RFC 1918
zone "10.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "16.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "17.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "18.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "19.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "20.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "21.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "22.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "23.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "24.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "25.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "26.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "27.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "28.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "29.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "30.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "31.172.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
zone "168.192.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
// RFC 5735
zone "254.169.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "db.empty"; };
// Also answer authoritatively for the HOSTNAME.AS112.NET zone,
// which contains data of operational relevance.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 9
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
zone "hostname.as112.net" {
type master;
file "db.hostname.as112.net";
};
The "db.empty" file follows, below. This is the source data used to
populate all the IN-ADDR.ARPA zones listed in Section 2.1. Note that
the RNAME specified in the SOA record corresponds to
hostmaster@root-servers.org, a suitable email address for receiving
technical queries about these zones.
; db.empty
;
; Empty zone for AS112 server.
;
$TTL 1W
@ IN SOA prisoner.iana.org. hostmaster.root-servers.org. (
1 ; serial number
1W ; refresh
1M ; retry
1W ; expire
1W ) ; negative caching TTL
;
NS blackhole-1.iana.org.
NS blackhole-2.iana.org.
;
; There should be no other resource records included in this zone.
;
; Records that relate to RFC 1918-numbered resources within the
; site hosting this AS112 node should not be hosted on this
; nameserver.
The "db.hostname.as112.net" file follows, below. This zone contains
various resource records that provide operational data to users for
troubleshooting or measurement purposes; the data should be edited to
suit local circumstances. Note that the response to the query
"HOSTNAME.AS112.NET IN TXT" should fit within a 512-octet DNS/UDP
datagram: i.e., it should be available over UDP transport without
requiring EDNS0 support.
The optional LOC record [RFC 1876] included in the zone apex provides
information about the geospatial location of the node.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 10
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
; db.hostname.as112.net
;
$TTL 1W
@ SOA server.example.net. admin.example.net. (
1 ; serial number
1W ; refresh
1M ; retry
1W ; expire
1W ) ; negative caching TTL
;
NS blackhole-2.iana.org.
NS blackhole-1.iana.org.
;
TXT "Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"
TXT "See http://www.as112.net/ for more information."
;
LOC 45 25 0.000 N 75 42 0.000 W 80.00m 1m 10000m 10m
3.6. Testing a Newly Installed Node
The BIND9 tool "dig" can be used to retrieve the TXT resource records
associated with the domain "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET", directed at one of
the AS112 anycast nameserver addresses. Continuing the example from
above, the response received should indicate the identity of the
AS112 node that responded to the query. See Section 3.5 for more
details about the resource records associated with
"HOSTNAME.AS112.NET".
% dig @prisoner.iana.org hostname.as112.net txt +short +norec
"Name of Facility or similar" "City, Country"
"See http://www.as112.net/ for more information."
%
If the response received indicates a different node is being used,
then there is probably a routing problem to solve. If there is no
response received at all, there might be a host or nameserver
problem. Judicious use of tools such as traceroute and consultation
of BGP looking glasses might be useful in troubleshooting.
Note that an appropriate set of tests for a new server will include
queries sent from many different places within the expected service
area of the node, using both UDP and TCP transport, and exercising
all three AS112 anycast nameserver addresses.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 11
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
4. Operations
4.1. Monitoring
AS112 nodes should be monitored to ensure they are functioning
correctly, just as with any other production service. An AS112 node
that stops answering queries correctly can cause failures and
timeouts in unexpected places and can lead to failures in dependent
systems that can be difficult to troubleshoot.
4.2. Downtime
An AS112 node that needs to go off-line (e.g., for planned
maintenance or as part of the diagnosis of some problem) should stop
advertising the AS112 service prefix to its BGP peers. This can be
done by shutting down the routing software on the node altogether or
by causing the routing system to withdraw the route.
Withdrawing the service prefix is important in order to avoid
blackholing query traffic in the event that the DNS software on the
node is not functioning normally.
4.3. Statistics and Measurement
Use of the AS112 node should be measured in order to track long-term
trends, identify anomalous conditions, and ensure that the
configuration of the AS112 node is sufficient to handle the query
load.
Examples of free monitoring tools that might be useful to operators
of AS112 nodes include:
o bindgraph [BINDGRAPH]
o dnstop [DNSTOP]
o DSC [DSC]
5. Communications
It is good operational practice to notify the community of users that
may fall within the reach of a new AS112 node before it is installed.
At Internet Exchanges, local mailing lists usually exist to
facilitate such announcements.
For nodes that are intended to be globally reachable, coordination
with other AS112 operators is especially recommended. The mailing
list <as112-ops@lists.dns-oarc.net> is operated for this purpose.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 12
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
Information pertinent to AS112 operations is maintained at
<http://www.as112.net/>.
Information about an AS112 node should also be published within the
DNS, within the "HOSTNAME.AS112.NET" zone. See Section 3.5 for more
details.
6. On the Future of AS112 Nodes
It is recommended practice for the operators of recursive nameservers
to answer queries for zones served by AS112 nodes locally, such that
queries never have an opportunity to reach AS112 servers [RFC 6303].
Operational experience with AS112 nodes does not currently indicate
an observable trend towards compliance with those recommendations,
however.
It is expected that some DNS software vendors will include default
configuration that will implement measures such as those described in
[RFC 6303]. If such software is widely deployed, it is reasonable to
assume that the query load received by AS112 nodes will decrease;
however, it is safe to assume that the query load will not decrease
to zero, and consequently that AS112 nodes will continue to provide a
useful service for the foreseeable future.
There may be a requirement in the future for AS112 nodes to answer
for their current set of zones over IPv6 transport. Such a
requirement would necessitate the assignment of a corresponding IPv6
netblock for use as an anycast service prefix.
There may be a requirement in the future for AS112 nodes to serve
additional zones or to stop serving particular zones that are
currently served. Such changes would be widely announced in
operational forums and published at <http://www.as112.net/>.
7. IANA Considerations
The AS112 nameservers are all named under the domain IANA.ORG (see
Section 2.2). However, the anycast infrastructure itself is operated
by a loosely coordinated, diverse mix of organisations across the
Internet, and is not an IANA function.
The Autonomous System Number 112 and the IPv4 prefix 192.175.48.0/24
were assigned by ARIN.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 13
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
8. Security Considerations
Hosts should never normally send queries to AS112 servers; queries
relating to private-use addresses should be answered locally within a
site. Hosts that send queries to AS112 servers may well leak
information relating to private infrastructure to the public network,
and this could present a security risk. This risk is orthogonal to
the presence or absence of authoritative servers for these zones in
the public DNS infrastructure, however.
Queries that are answered by AS112 servers are usually unintentional;
it follows that the responses from AS112 servers are usually
unexpected. Unexpected inbound traffic can trigger intrusion
detection systems or alerts by firewalls. Operators of AS112 servers
should be prepared to be contacted by operators of remote
infrastructure who believe their security has been violated. Advice
to those who mistakenly believe that responses from AS112 nodes
constitute an attack on their infrastructure can be found in
[RFC 6305].
The deployment of AS112 nodes is very loosely coordinated compared to
other services distributed using anycast. The malicious compromise
of an AS112 node and subversion of the data served by the node are
hence more difficult to detect due to the lack of central management.
Since it is conceivable that changing the responses to queries
received by AS112 nodes might influence the behaviour of the hosts
sending the queries, such a compromise might be used as an attack
vector against private infrastructure.
Operators of AS112 should take appropriate measures to ensure that
AS112 nodes are appropriately protected from compromise, such as
would normally be employed for production nameserver or network
infrastructure. The guidance provided for root nameservers in
[RFC 2870] may be instructive.
The zones hosted by AS112 servers are not signed with DNSSEC
[RFC 4033]. Given the distributed and loosely coordinated structure
of the AS112 service, the zones concerned could only be signed if the
private key material used was effectively public, obviating any
security benefit resulting from the use of those keys.
9. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Bill Manning, John
Brown, Marco D'Itri, Daniele Arena, Stephane Bortzmeyer, Frank
Habicht, Chris Thompson, Peter Losher, Peter Koch, Alfred Hoenes, S.
Moonesamy, and Mehmet Akcin in the preparation of this document.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 14
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC 1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and
facilities", STD 13, RFC 1034, November 1987.
[RFC 1918] Rekhter, Y., Moskowitz, R., Karrenberg, D., Groot, G.,
and E. Lear, "Address Allocation for Private Internets",
BCP 5, RFC 1918, February 1996.
[RFC 2870] Bush, R., Karrenberg, D., Kosters, M., and R. Plzak,
"Root Name Server Operational Requirements", BCP 40,
RFC 2870, June 2000.
[RFC 4033] Arends, R., Austein, R., Larson, M., Massey, D., and S.
Rose, "DNS Security Introduction and Requirements",
RFC 4033, March 2005.
[RFC 4271] Rekhter, Y., Li, T., and S. Hares, "A Border Gateway
Protocol 4 (BGP-4)", RFC 4271, January 2006.
[RFC 4786] Abley, J. and K. Lindqvist, "Operation of Anycast
Services", BCP 126, RFC 4786, December 2006.
10.2. Informative References
[BIND] Internet Systems Consortium, "BIND",
<http://www.isc.org/software/BIND/>.
[BINDGRAPH] Delaurenti, M. and M. d'Itri, "bindgraph",
<http://www.linux.it/~md/software/>.
[DNSTOP] The Measurement Factory, "Dnstop: Stay on Top of Your
DNS Traffic",
<http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dnstop/>.
[DSC] The Measurement Factory, "Dsc: A DNS Statistics
Collector",
<http://dns.measurement-factory.com/tools/dsc/>.
[QUAGGA] "Quagga Software Routing Suite",
<http://www.quagga.net>.
[RFC 1876] Davis, C., Vixie, P., Goodwin, T., and I. Dickinson, "A
Means for Expressing Location Information in the Domain
Name System", RFC 1876, January 1996.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 15
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
[RFC 5735] Cotton, M. and L. Vegoda, "Special Use IPv4 Addresses",
BCP 153, RFC 5735, January 2010.
[RFC 5855] Abley, J. and T. Manderson, "Nameservers for IPv4 and
IPv6 Reverse Zones", BCP 155, RFC 5855, May 2010.
[RFC 6303] Andrews, M., "Locally Served DNS Zones", BCP 163,
RFC 6303, July 2011.
[RFC 6305] Abley, J. and W. Maton, "I'm Being Attacked by
PRISONER.IANA.ORG!", RFC 6305, July 2011.
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 16
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
Appendix A. History
Widespread use of the private address blocks listed in [RFC 1918]
followed that document's publication in 1996. At that time the
IN-ADDR.ARPA zone was served by root servers.
The idea of off-loading IN-ADDR.ARPA queries relating to [RFC 1918]
addresses from the root nameservers was first proposed by Bill
Manning and John Brown.
The use of anycast for distributing authoritative DNS service for
[RFC 1918] IN-ADDR.ARPA zones was subsequently proposed at a private
meeting of root server operators.
ARIN provided an IPv4 prefix for the anycast service and also the
autonomous system number 112 for use in originating that prefix.
This assignment gave the project its name.
In 2002, the first AS112 anycast nodes were deployed.
In 2011, the IN-ADDR.ARPA zone was redelegated from the root servers
to a new set of servers operated independently by AfriNIC, APNIC,
ARIN, ICANN, LACNIC, and the RIPE NCC and named according to
[RFC 5855].
The use of anycast nameservers in the AS112 project contributed to
the operational experience of anycast DNS services, and it can be
seen as a precursor to the anycast distribution of other
authoritative DNS servers in subsequent years (e.g., various root
servers).
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 17
RFC 6304 AS112 Nameserver Operations July 2011
Authors' Addresses
Joe Abley
ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
US
Phone: +1 519 670 9327
EMail: joe.abley@icann.org
William F. Maton Sotomayor
National Research Council of Canada
1200 Montreal Road
Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6
Canada
Phone: +1 613 993 0880
EMail: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
Abley & Maton Informational PAGE 18
RFC TOTAL SIZE: 34002 bytes
PUBLICATION DATE: Thursday, July 14th, 2011
LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)
|
