|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 630
FTP error code usage for more reliable mail service Last modified on Thursday, March 2nd, 2000 Permanent link to RFC 630 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 630 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 630 Network Working Group Julie Sussman RFC # 630 BBN NIC # 30237 April 10, 1974 FTP Error Code Usage for More Reliable Mail Service PURPOSE A major hindrance to providing reliable mail service is the lack of well-defined FTP error replies that would enable a mailing process to decide how to handle a failure. New FTP error codes are currently in the design stage, and a proposal will be announced soon. In the interim, we can get some improvement by simply defining how we intend to use the current FTP codes. The purpose of this RFC is to inform all sites of how TENEX sites will use and interpret the codes starting in the near future. CURRENT CODE DEFINITIONS The FTP error codes defined for failure to perform a file action (including mail) are: 450 File not found 451 File access denied to you 452 Data connection closed 453 Insufficient storage 454 Cannot connect to your data socket 450, 451, and 453 are applicable to both the MAIL and MLFL commands, while 452 and 454 are only meaningful for MLFL. SHORTCOMING OF CURRENT DEFINITIONS There are more possible causes of failure to deliver mail than the ones defined above. Implementors of FTP servers thus had to make arbitrary assignments of error conditions to defined codes. As a result, although the text of the reply might distinguish these conditions for the benefit of human users, the code doesn't distinguish them for the benefit of processes. The minimum distinction needed by the TENEX mail-sending processes is between permanent and non-permanent failures. In the latter case, the process will repeatedly try to deliver the mail for several days. Sussman PAGE 1 |