The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 6088   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 6088

Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings

Last modified on Friday, January 28th, 2011

Permanent link to RFC 6088
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 6088
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 6088







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       G. Tsirtsis
Request for Comments: 6088                                   G. Giaretta
Category: Standards Track                                     Qualcomm
ISSN: 2070-1721                                               H. Soliman
                                                    Elevate Technologies
                                                            N. Montavont
                                                                   IT/TB
                                                            January 2011


                  Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings

 Abstract

   This document defines binary formats for IPv4 and IPv6 traffic
   selectors to be used in conjunction with flow bindings for Mobile
   IPv6.

 Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6088.

 Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.





Tsirtsis, et al.             Standards Track                 PAGE 1 top


RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Requirements Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3. Traffic Selector Sub-Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.1. IPv4 Binary Traffic Selector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.2. IPv6 Binary Traffic Selector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1. Introduction This document defines binary formats for IPv4 and IPv6 traffic selector sub-options, as defined in [RFC 6089]. The binary traffic selector format defined here, allows for efficient identification of flow(s) based on well-known fields in IPv4 [RFC 791], IPv6 [RFC 2460], and transport layer headers like TCP [RFC 793] and UDP [RFC 768]. 2. Requirements Notation The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119]. 3. Traffic Selector Sub-Options [RFC 6089] defines the format for the traffic selector sub-option. The following values of the TS Format field are defined in this specification for binary traffic selectors. TS Format: 1 IPv4 binary traffic selector 2 IPv6 binary traffic selector 3.1. IPv4 Binary Traffic Selector If the TS Format field of the traffic selector sub-option indicates "IPv4 binary traffic selector", then the traffic selector is formatted as shown below. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 2 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 The alignment requirement for this sub-option is: 4n if A, B, C, D, E, or F is set 2n if G, H, I, or J is set n if K, L, M, or N is set 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Sub-opt Type | Sub-Opt Len | TS Format | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|N| Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (A)Start Source Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (B)End Source Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (C)Start Destination Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (D)End Destination Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (E)Start IPsec SPI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (F)End IPsec SPI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (G)Start Source port | (H)End Source port | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (I)Start Destination port | (J)End Destination port | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (K)Start DS | (L)End DS |(M)Start Prot. | (N) End Prot. | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: IPv4 binary traffic selector Flags (A-N) Each flag indicates whether the corresponding field is present in the message. (A)Start Source Address This field identifies the first source address, from the range of 32-bit IPv4 addresses to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. In other words, this is one of the addresses of the correspondent node. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 3 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 (B)End Source Address If more than one contiguous source address needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Source Address field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Source Address field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the addresses between fields (A) and (B), inclusive of (A) and (B). (C)Start Destination Address This field identifies the first destination address, from the range of 32-bit IPv4 addresses to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. In other words, this is one of the registered home addresses of the mobile node. (D)End Destination Address If more than one contiguous destination address needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Destination Address field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Destination Address field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the addresses between fields (C) and (D), inclusive of (C) and (D). (E)Start IPsec SPI - Security Parameter Index This field identifies the first 32-bit IPsec SPI value, from the range of SPI values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. This field is defined in [RFC 4303]. (F)End IPsec SPI - Security Parameter Index If more than one contiguous SPI value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start IPsec SPI field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start IPsec SPI field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the SPI values between fields (E) and (F), inclusive of (E) and (F). Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 4 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 (G)Start Source Port This field identifies the first 16-bit source port number, from the range of port numbers to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. This is from the range of port numbers defined by IANA (http://www.iana.org). (H)End Source Port If more than one contiguous source port number needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Source Port field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Source Port field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the port numbers between fields (G) and (H), inclusive of (G) and (H). (I)Start Destination Port This field identifies the first 16-bit destination port number, from the range of port numbers to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. (J)End Destination Port If more than one contiguous destination port number needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Destination Port field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Destination Port field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the port numbers between fields (I) and (J), inclusive of (I) and (J). (K)Start DS - Differential Services This field identifies the first differential services value, from the range of differential services values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. Note that this field is called a "Type of Service field" in [RFC 791]. [RFC 3260] then clarified that the field has been redefined as a 6-bit DS field with 2 bits reserved, later claimed by Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) [RFC 3168]. For the purpose of this specification, the (K)Start DS field is 8 bits long, where the 6 most significant bits indicate the DS field to be matched and the 2 least significant bits' values MUST be ignored in any comparison. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 5 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 (L)End DS - Differential Services If more than one contiguous DS value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start DS field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start DS field is included. When this field is included, it MUST be coded the same way as defined for (K). When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the values between fields (K) and (L), inclusive of (K) and (L). (M)Start Protocol This field identifies the first 8-bit protocol value, from the range of protocol values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. (N)End Protocol If more than one contiguous protocol value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Protocol field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Protocol field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the values between fields (M) and (N), inclusive of (M) and (N). Reserved Reserved for future use. These bits MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver. 3.2. IPv6 Binary Traffic Selector If the TS Format field of the traffic selector sub-option indicates "IPv6 binary traffic selector", then the traffic selector is formatted as follows: The alignment requirement for this sub-option is: 8n if A, B, C, or D is set 4n if E, F, G, or H is set 2n if I, J, K, or L is set n if M, N, O, or P is set Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 6 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |Sub-opt Type | Sub-Opt Len | TS Format | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|N|O|P| Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | + + | | + (A)Start Source Address + | | + + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | + + | | + (B)End Source Address + | | + + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | + + | | + (C)Start Destination Address + | | + + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | + + | | + (D)End Destination Address + | | + + | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (E)Start IPsec SPI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (F)End IPsec SPI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (G)Start Flow Label | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (H)End Flow Label | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (I)Start Source port | (J)End Source port | Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 7 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (K)Start Destination port | (L)End Destination port | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | (M)Start TC | (N)End TC | (O)Start NH | (P) End NH | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 2: IPv6 binary traffic selector Flags (A-P) Each flag indicates whether the corresponding field is present in the message (A)Start Source Address This field identifies the first source address, from the range of 128-bit IPv6 addresses to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. In other words, this is one of the addresses of the correspondent node. (B)End Source Address If more than one contiguous source address needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Source Address field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Source Address field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the addresses between fields (A) and (B), inclusive of (A) and (B). (C)Start Destination Address This field identifies the first destination address, from the range of 128-bit IPv6 addresses to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. In other words, this is one of the registered home addresses of the mobile node. (D)End Destination Address If more than one contiguous destination address needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Destination Address field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Destination Address field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the addresses between fields (C) and (D), inclusive of (C) and (D). Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 8 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 (E)Start IPsec SPI - Security Parameter Index This field identifies the first 32-bit IPsec SPI value, from the range of SPI values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. This field is defined in [RFC 4303]. (F)End IPsec SPI - Security Parameter Index If more than one contiguous SPI value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start IPsec SPI field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start IPsec SPI field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the SPI values between fields (E) and (F), inclusive of (E) and (F). (G)Start Flow Label This field identifies the first flow label value, from the range of flow label values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. According to [RFC 2460], the flow label is 24 bits long. For the purpose of this specification, the sender of this option MUST prefix the flow label value with 8 bits of "0" before inserting it in the (G)Start Flow Label field. The receiver SHOULD ignore the first 8 bits of this field before using it in comparisons with flow labels in packets. (H)End Flow Label If more than one contiguous flow label value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Flow Label field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Flow Label field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the flow label values between fields (G) and (H), inclusive of (G) and (H). When this field is included, it MUST be coded the same way as defined for (G). (I)Start Source Port This field identifies the first 16-bit source port number, from the range of port numbers to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 9 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 (J)End Source Port If more than one contiguous source port number needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Source Port field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Source Port field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the port numbers between fields (I) and (J), inclusive of (I) and (J). (K)Start Destination Port This field identifies the first 16-bit destination port number, from the range of port numbers to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. (L)End Destination Port If more than one contiguous destination port number needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start Destination Port field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start Destination Port field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the port numbers between fields (K) and (L), inclusive of (K) and (L). (M)Start TC - Traffic Class This field identifies the first traffic class value, from the range of traffic class values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. This field is equivalent to the Start DS field in the IPv4 traffic selector in Figure 1. As per [RFC 3260], the field is defined as a 6-bit DS field with 2 bits reserved, later claimed by Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) [RFC 3168]. For the purpose of this specification, the (M)Start TC field is 8 bits long, where the 6 most significant bits indicate the DS field to be matched and the 2 least significant bits' values MUST be ignored in any comparison. (N)End TC - Traffic Class If more than one contiguous TC value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start TC field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start TC field is included. When this Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 10 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 field is included, it MUST be coded the same way as defined for (M). When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the values between fields (M) and (N), inclusive of (M) and (N). (O)Start NH - Next Header This field identifies the first 8-bit next header value, from the range of next header values to be matched, on data packets sent from a corresponding node to the mobile node as seen by the home agent. (P)End NH - Next Header If more than one contiguous next header value needs to be matched, then this field can be used to indicate the end value of a range starting from the value of the Start NH field. This field MUST NOT be included unless the Start next header field is included. When this field is included, the receiver will match all of the values between fields (O) and (P), inclusive of (O) and (P). Reserved Reserved for future use. These bits MUST be set to zero by the sender and ignored by the receiver. 4. Security Considerations This document defines the format of the traffic selector field of a sub-option defined for flow bindings [RFC 6089]. The authors have not identified any security concerns pertaining to this document beyond what is already identified in [RFC 6089]. 5. IANA Considerations The following new TS format values have been assigned from the "Traffic Selector Format" namespace for the traffic selector sub- option defined in [RFC 6089]. 1 IPv4 Binary Traffic Selector 2 IPv6 Binary Traffic Selector 6. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Patrick Stupar and Julien Laganier for their contributions to this document. We would also like to thank Benjamin Lim, Dave Craig, Patrick Stupar, and Basavaraj Patil for their reviews and comments. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 11 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 7. References 7.1. Normative References [RFC 768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768, August 1980. [RFC 791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September 1981. [RFC 793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981. [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC 2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998. [RFC 3168] Ramakrishnan, K., Floyd, S., and D. Black, "The Addition of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) to IP", RFC 3168, September 2001. [RFC 4303] Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", RFC 4303, December 2005. [RFC 6089] Tsirtsis, G., Soliman, H., Montavont, N., Giaretta, G., and K. Kuladinithi, "Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support", RFC 6089, January 2011. 7.2. Informative References [RFC 3260] Grossman, D., "New Terminology and Clarifications for Diffserv", RFC 3260, April 2002. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 12 top

RFC 6088 Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings January 2011 Authors' Addresses George Tsirtsis Qualcomm EMail: tsirtsis@qualcomm.com Gerardo Giaretta Qualcomm EMail: gerardog@qualcomm.com Hesham Soliman Elevate Technologies EMail: hesham@elevatemobile.com Nicolas Montavont Institut Telecom / Telecom Bretagne 2, rue de la chataigneraie Cesson Sevigne 35576 France Phone: (+33) 2 99 12 70 23 EMail: nicolas.montavont@telecom-bretagne.eu URI: http://www.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr/~nmontavo// Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track PAGE 13 top

Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings RFC TOTAL SIZE: 28040 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Friday, January 28th, 2011 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 6088: The IETF Trust, Friday, January 28th, 2011
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement