|
|
|
|
|
|
IETF RFC 5061
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration
Last modified on Friday, September 21st, 2007
 Permanent link to RFC 5061
 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 5061
 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 5061
Network Working Group R. Stewart
Request for Comments: 5061 Cisco Systems, Inc.
Category: Standards Track Q. Xie
Motorola, Inc.
M. Tuexen
Univ. of Applied Sciences Muenster
S. Maruyama
M. Kozuka
Kyoto University
September 2007
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)
Dynamic Address Reconfiguration
 Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
A local host may have multiple points of attachment to the Internet,
giving it a degree of fault tolerance from hardware failures. Stream
Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) (RFC 4960) was developed to take
full advantage of such a multi-homed host to provide a fast failover
and association survivability in the face of such hardware failures.
This document describes an extension to SCTP that will allow an SCTP
stack to dynamically add an IP address to an SCTP association,
dynamically delete an IP address from an SCTP association, and to
request to set the primary address the peer will use when sending to
an endpoint.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 1 
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Serial Number Arithmetic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Additional Chunks and Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. New Chunk Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1.1. Address Configuration Change Chunk (ASCONF) . . . . . 5
4.1.2. Address Configuration Acknowledgment Chunk
(ASCONF-ACK) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. New Parameter Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2.1. Add IP Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.2.2. Delete IP Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.2.3. Error Cause Indication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.2.4. Set Primary IP Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4.2.5. Success Indication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.2.6. Adaptation Layer Indication . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.2.7. Supported Extensions Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.3. New Error Causes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.3.1. Error Cause: Request to Delete Last Remaining IP
Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.3.2. Error Cause: Operation Refused Due to Resource
Shortage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
4.3.3. Error Cause: Request to Delete Source IP Address . . . 16
4.3.4. Error Cause: Association Aborted Due to Illegal
ASCONF-ACK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
4.3.5. Error Cause: Request Refused - No Authorization. . . . 17
5. Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.1. ASCONF Chunk Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.1.1. Congestion Control of ASCONF Chunks . . . . . . . . . 20
5.2. Upon Reception of an ASCONF Chunk . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
5.3. General Rules for Address Manipulation . . . . . . . . . . 24
5.3.1. A Special Case for OOTB ABORT Chunks . . . . . . . . . 29
5.3.2. A Special Case for Changing an Address . . . . . . . . 29
5.4. Setting of the Primary Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5.5. Bundling of Multiple ASCONFs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Appendix A. Abstract Address Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
A.1. General Remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
A.2. Generalized Endpoints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
A.3. Associations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
A.4. Relationship with RFC 4960 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
A.5. Rules for Address Manipulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 2
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
1. Introduction
A local host may have multiple points of attachment to the Internet,
giving it a degree of fault tolerance from hardware failures. SCTP
was developed to take full advantage of such a multi-homed host to
provide a fast failover and association survivability in the face of
such hardware failures. However, many modern computers allow for the
dynamic addition and deletion of network cards (sometimes termed a
hot-pluggable interface). Complicate this with the ability of a
provider, in IPv6, to dynamically renumber a network, and there still
is a gap between full-fault tolerance and the currently defined SCTP
protocol. No matter if a card is added or an interface is
renumbered, in order to take advantage of this new configuration, the
transport association must be restarted. For many fault-tolerant
applications this restart is considered an outage and is undesirable.
This document describes an extension to SCTP to attempt to correct
this problem for the more demanding fault-tolerant application. This
extension will allow an SCTP stack to:
o Dynamically add an IP address to an association.
o Dynamically delete an IP address from an association.
o Request to set the primary address the peer will use when sending
to an endpoint.
The dynamic addition and subtraction of IP addresses allows an SCTP
association to continue to function through host and network
reconfigurations. These changes, brought on by provider or user
action, may mean that the peer would be better served by using the
newly added address; however, this information may only be known by
the endpoint that had the reconfiguration occur. In such a case this
extension allows the local endpoint to advise the peer as to what it
thinks is the better primary address that the peer should be using.
One last thing this extension adds is a small, 32-bit integer called
an adaptation indication that can be exchanged at startup. This is
useful for applications where there are one or more specific layers
below the application, yet still above SCTP. In such a case, the
exchange of this indication can allow the proper layer to be enabled
below the application.
2. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC 2119].
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 3
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
3. Serial Number Arithmetic
It is essential to remember that the actual Address Configuration
Change Chunk (ASCONF) Sequence Number space is finite, though very
large. This space ranges from 0 to 2**32 - 1. Since the space is
finite, all arithmetic dealing with ASCONF Sequence Numbers MUST be
performed modulo 2**32. This unsigned arithmetic preserves the
relationship of sequence numbers as they cycle from 2**32 - 1 to 0
again. There are some subtleties to computer modulo arithmetic, so
great care should be taken in programming the comparison of such
values. When referring to ASCONF Sequence Numbers, the symbol "=<"
means "less than or equal"(modulo 2**32).
Comparisons and arithmetic on ASCONF sequence numbers in this
document SHOULD use Serial Number Arithmetic as defined in [RFC 1982]
where SERIAL_BITS = 32.
ASCONF Sequence Numbers wrap around when they reach 2**32 - 1. That
is, the next ASCONF Sequence Number an ASCONF chunk MUST use after
transmitting an ASCONF Sequence Number = 2**32 - 1 is 0.
Any arithmetic done on Stream Sequence Numbers SHOULD use Serial
Number Arithmetic (as defined in [RFC 1982]) where SERIAL_BITS = 16.
All other arithmetic and comparisons in this document use normal
arithmetic.
4. Additional Chunks and Parameters
This section describes the addition of two new chunks and seven new
parameters to allow:
o Dynamic addition of IP addresses to an association.
o Dynamic deletion of IP addresses from an association.
o A request to set the primary address the peer will use when
sending to an endpoint.
Additionally, this section describes three new Error Causes that
support these new chunks and parameters.
4.1. New Chunk Types
This section defines two new chunk types that will be used to
transfer the control information reliably. Table 1 illustrates the
two new chunk types.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 4
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Chunk Type Chunk Name
--------------------------------------------------------------
0xC1 Address Configuration Change Chunk (ASCONF)
0x80 Address Configuration Acknowledgment (ASCONF-ACK)
Table 1: Address Configuration Chunks
4.1.1. Address Configuration Change Chunk (ASCONF)
This chunk is used to communicate to the remote endpoint one of the
configuration change requests that MUST be acknowledged. The
information carried in the ASCONF Chunk uses the form of a Type-
Length-Value (TLV), as described in "3.2.1 Optional/Variable-length
Parameter Format" in [RFC 4960] for all variable parameters. This
chunk MUST be sent in an authenticated way by using the mechanism
defined in [RFC 4895]. If this chunk is received unauthenticated it
MUST be silently discarded as described in [RFC 4895].
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 0xC1 | Chunk Flags | Chunk Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Address Parameter |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF Parameter #1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ \
/ .... /
\ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF Parameter #N |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Sequence Number: 32 bits (unsigned integer)
This value represents a Sequence Number for the ASCONF Chunk. The
valid range of a Sequence Number is from 0 to 4294967295 (2**32 - 1).
Sequence Numbers wrap back to 0 after reaching 4294967295.
Address Parameter: 8 or 20 bytes (depending on the address type)
This field contains an address parameter, either IPv6 or IPv4, from
[RFC 4960]. The address is an address of the sender of the ASCONF
Chunk; the address MUST be considered part of the association by the
peer endpoint (the receiver of the ASCONF Chunk). This field may be
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 5
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
used by the receiver of the ASCONF to help in finding the
association. If the address 0.0.0.0 or ::0 is provided, the receiver
MAY lookup the association by other information provided in the
packet. This parameter MUST be present in every ASCONF message, i.e.
it is a mandatory TLV parameter.
Note: The host name address MUST NOT be sent and MUST be ignored if
received in any ASCONF message.
It should be noted that the ASCONF Chunk format requires the receiver
to report to the sender if it does not understand the ASCONF Chunk.
This is accomplished by setting the upper bits in the chunk type as
described in [RFC 4960], Section 3.2. Note that the upper two bits in
the ASCONF Chunk are set to one. As defined in [RFC 4960], Section
3.2, when setting these upper bits in this manner the receiver that
does not understand this chunk MUST skip the chunk and continue
processing, and report in an Operation Error Chunk using the
'Unrecognized Chunk Type' cause of error. This will NOT abort the
association but indicates to the sender that it MUST not send any
further ASCONF chunks.
ASCONF Parameter: TLV format
Each address configuration change is represented by a TLV parameter,
as defined in Section 4.2. One or more requests may be present in an
ASCONF Chunk.
4.1.2. Address Configuration Acknowledgment Chunk (ASCONF-ACK)
This chunk is used by the receiver of an ASCONF Chunk to acknowledge
the reception. It carries zero or more results for any ASCONF
parameters that were processed by the receiver. This chunk MUST be
sent in an authenticated way by using the mechanism defined in
[RFC 4895]. If this chunk is received unauthenticated it MUST be
silently discarded as described in [RFC 4895].
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 6
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 0x80 | Chunk Flags | Chunk Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sequence Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF Parameter Response#1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ \
/ .... /
\ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF Parameter Response#N |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Sequence Number: 32 bits (unsigned integer)
This value represents the Sequence Number for the received ASCONF
Chunk that is acknowledged by this chunk. This value is copied from
the received ASCONF Chunk.
ASCONF Parameter Response: TLV format
The ASCONF Parameter Response is used in the ASCONF-ACK to report the
status of ASCONF processing. By default, if a responding endpoint
does not include any Error Cause, a success is indicated. Thus a
sender of an ASCONF-ACK MAY indicate complete success of all TLVs in
an ASCONF by returning only the Chunk Type, Chunk Flags, Chunk Length
(set to 8), and the Sequence Number.
4.2. New Parameter Types
The seven new parameters added follow the format defined in Section
3.2.1 of [RFC 4960]. Tables 2, 3, and 4 describe the parameters.
Address Configuration Parameters Parameter Type
-------------------------------------------------
Set Primary Address 0xC004
Adaptation Layer Indication 0xC006
Supported Extensions 0x8008
Table 2: Parameters That Can Be Used in an INIT/INIT-ACK Chunk
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 7
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Address Configuration Parameters Parameter Type
-------------------------------------------------
Add IP Address 0xC001
Delete IP Address 0xC002
Set Primary Address 0xC004
Table 3: Parameters Used in an ASCONF Parameter
Address Configuration Parameters Parameter Type
-------------------------------------------------
Error Cause Indication 0xC003
Success Indication 0xC005
Table 4: Parameters Used in an ASCONF Parameter Response
Any parameter that appears where it is not allowed (for example, a
0xC002 parameter appearing within an INIT or INIT-ACK) MAY be
responded to with an ABORT by the receiver of the invalid parameter.
If the receiver chooses NOT to abort, the parameter MUST be ignored.
A robust implementation SHOULD ignore the parameter and leave the
association intact.
4.2.1. Add IP Address
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 0xC001 | Length = Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF-Request Correlation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Address Parameter |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
ASCONF-Request Correlation ID: 32 bits
This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
2-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the
ASCONF-ACK response parameter. The sender of the ASCONF can use this
same value in the ASCONF-ACK to find which request the response is
for. Note that the receiver MUST NOT change this 32-bit value.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 8
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Address Parameter: TLV
This field contains an IPv4 or IPv6 address parameter as described in
Section 3.3.2.1 of [RFC 4960]. The complete TLV is wrapped within
this parameter. It informs the receiver that the address specified
is to be added to the existing association. This parameter MUST NOT
contain a broadcast or multicast address. If the address 0.0.0.0 or
::0 is provided, the source address of the packet MUST be added.
An example TLV requesting that the IPv4 address 192.0.2.1 be added to
the association would look as follows:
+--------------------------------+
| Type=0xC001 | Length = 16 |
+--------------------------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023474 |
+--------------------------------+
| Type=5 | Length = 8 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Value=0xC0000201 |
+----------------+---------------+
Valid Chunk Appearance
The Add IP Address parameter may only appear in the ASCONF Chunk
type.
4.2.2. Delete IP Address
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type =0xC002 | Length = Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF-Request Correlation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Address Parameter |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
ASCONF-Request Correlation ID: 32 bits
This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
32-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the
ASCONF-ACK response parameter. The sender of the ASCONF can use this
same value in the ASCONF-ACK to find which request the response is
for. Note that the receiver MUST NOT change this 32-bit value.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 9
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Address Parameter: TLV
This field contains an IPv4 or IPv6 address parameter, as described
in Section 3.3.2.1 of [RFC 4960]. The complete TLV is wrapped within
this parameter. It informs the receiver that the address specified
is to be removed from the existing association. This parameter MUST
NOT contain a broadcast or multicast address. If the address 0.0.0.0
or ::0 is provided, all addresses of the peer except the source
address of the packet MUST be deleted.
An example TLV deleting the IPv4 address 192.0.2.1 from an existing
association would look as follows:
+--------------------------------+
| Type=0xC002 | Length = 16 |
+--------------------------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023476 |
+--------------------------------+
| Type=5 | Length = 8 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Value=0xC0000201 |
+----------------+---------------+
Valid Chunk Appearance
The Delete IP Address parameter may only appear in the ASCONF Chunk
type.
4.2.3. Error Cause Indication
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 0xC003 | Length = Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF-Response Correlation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Error Cause(s) or Success Indication |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
ASCONF-Response Correlation ID: 32 bits
This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
32-bit value from the ASCONF-Request Correlation ID into the ASCONF
Response Correlation ID field so the peer can easily correlate the
request to this response. Note that the receiver MUST NOT change
this 32-bit value.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 10
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Error Cause(s): TLV(s)
When reporting an error, this response parameter is used to wrap one
or more standard Error Causes normally found within an SCTP
Operational Error or SCTP Abort (as defined in [RFC 4960]). The Error
Cause(s) follow the format defined in Section 3.3.10 of [RFC 4960].
Valid Chunk Appearance
The Error Cause Indication parameter may only appear in the ASCONF-
ACK Chunk Type.
4.2.4. Set Primary IP Address
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type =0xC004 | Length = Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF-Request Correlation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Address Parameter |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
ASCONF-Request Correlation ID: 32 bits
This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
32-bit value into the ASCONF Response Correlation ID field of the
ASCONF-ACK response parameter. The sender of the ASCONF can use this
same value in the ASCONF-ACK to find which request the response is
for. Note that the receiver MUST NOT change this 32-bit value.
Address Parameter: TLV
This field contains an IPv4 or IPv6 address parameter as described in
Section 3.3.2.1 of [RFC 4960]. The complete TLV is wrapped within
this parameter. It requests the receiver to mark the specified
address as the primary address to send data to (see Section 5.1.2 of
[RFC 4960]). The receiver MAY mark this as its primary address upon
receiving this request. If the address 0.0.0.0 or ::0 is provided,
the receiver MAY mark the source address of the packet as its
primary.
An example TLV requesting that the IPv4 address 192.0.2.1 be made the
primary destination address would look as follows:
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 11
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
+--------------------------------+
| Type=0xC004 | Length = 16 |
+--------------------------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023479 |
+--------------------------------+
| Type=5 | Length = 8 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Value=0xC0000201 |
+----------------+---------------+
Valid Chunk Appearance
The Set Primary IP Address parameter may appear in the ASCONF, the
INIT, or the INIT-ACK Chunk Type. The inclusion of this parameter in
the INIT or INIT-ACK can be used to indicate an initial preference of
primary address.
4.2.5. Success Indication
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type = 0xC005 | Length = 8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ASCONF-Response Correlation ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
By default, if a responding endpoint does not report an error for any
requested TLV, a success is implicitly indicated. Thus, a sender of
an ASCONF-ACK MAY indicate complete success of all TLVs in an ASCONF
by returning only the Chunk Type, Chunk Flags, Chunk Length (set to
8), and the Sequence Number.
The responding endpoint MAY also choose to explicitly report a
success for a requested TLV, by returning a success report ASCONF
Parameter Response.
ASCONF-Response Correlation ID: 32 bits
This is an opaque integer assigned by the sender to identify each
request parameter. The receiver of the ASCONF Chunk will copy this
32-bit value from the ASCONF-Request Correlation ID into the ASCONF
Response Correlation ID field so the peer can easily correlate the
request to this response.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 12
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Valid Chunk Appearance
The Success Indication parameter may only appear in the ASCONF-ACK
Chunk Type.
4.2.6. Adaptation Layer Indication
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type =0xC006 | Length = 8 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Adaptation Code point |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
This parameter is specified for the communication of peer upper-layer
protocols. It is envisioned to be used for flow control and other
adaptation layers that require an indication to be carried in the
INIT and INIT-ACK. Each adaptation layer that is defined that wishes
to use this parameter MUST specify an adaptation code point in an
appropriate RFC defining its use and meaning. This parameter SHOULD
NOT be examined by the receiving SCTP implementation and should be
passed opaquely to the upper-layer protocol.
Note: This parameter is not used in either the addition or deletion
of addresses but is for the convenience of the upper layer. This
document includes this parameter to minimize the number of SCTP
documents.
Valid Chunk Appearance
The Adaptation Layer Indication parameter may appear in INIT or INIT-
ACK chunk and SHOULD be passed to the receiver's upper-layer protocol
based upon the upper-layer protocol configuration of the SCTP stack.
This parameter MUST NOT be sent in any other chunks, and if it is
received in another chunk, it MUST be ignored.
4.2.7. Supported Extensions Parameter
This parameter is used at startup to identify any additional
extensions that the sender supports. The sender MUST support both
the sending and the receiving of any chunk types listed within the
Supported Extensions Parameter. An implementation supporting this
extension MUST list the ASCONF,the ASCONF-ACK, and the AUTH chunks in
its INIT and INIT-ACK parameters.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 13
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Parameter Type = 0x8008 | Parameter Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CHUNK TYPE 1 | CHUNK TYPE 2 | CHUNK TYPE 3 | CHUNK TYPE 4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| .... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| CHUNK TYPE N | PAD | PAD | PAD |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Parameter Type This field holds the IANA-defined parameter type for
the Supported Extensions Parameter. The value of this field is
0x8008.
Parameter Type Length This field holds the length of the parameter,
including the Parameter Type, Parameter Length, and any additional
supported extensions. Note: The length MUST NOT include any padding.
CHUNK TYPE X This field(s) hold the chunk type of any SCTP
extension(s) that are currently supported by the sending SCTP.
Multiple chunk types may be defined listing each additional feature
that the sender supports. The sender MUST NOT include multiple
Supported Extensions Parameter within any chunk.
Parameter Appearance This parameter may appear in the INIT or INIT-
ACK chunk. This parameter MUST NOT appear in any other chunk.
4.3. New Error Causes
Five new Error Causes are added to the SCTP Operational Errors,
primarily for use in the ASCONF-ACK Chunk.
Cause Code
Value Cause Code
--------- ----------------
0x00A0 Request to Delete Last Remaining IP Address
0x00A1 Operation Refused Due to Resource Shortage
0x00A2 Request to Delete Source IP Address
0x00A3 Association Aborted Due to Illegal ASCONF-ACK
0x00A4 Request Refused - No Authorization
Table 5: New Error Causes
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 14
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
4.3.1. Error Cause: Request to Delete Last Remaining IP Address
Cause of error
Request to Delete Last Remaining IP Address: The receiver of this
error sent a request to delete the last IP address from its
association with its peer. This error indicates that the request is
rejected.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cause Code=0x00A0 | Cause Length=Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ TLV-Copied-From-ASCONF /
/ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
An example of a failed delete in an Error Cause TLV would look as
follows in the response ASCONF-ACK message:
+--------------------------------+
| Type = 0xC003 | Length = 28 |
+----------------+---------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023476 |
+--------------------------------+
| Cause=0x00A0 | Length = 20 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Type= 0xC002 | Length = 16 |
+----------------+---------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023476 |
+--------------------------------+
| Type=0x0005 | Length = 8 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Value=0xC0000201 |
+----------------+---------------+
4.3.2. Error Cause: Operation Refused Due to Resource Shortage
Cause of error
This Error Cause is used to report a failure by the receiver to
perform the requested operation due to a lack of resources. The
entire TLV that is refused is copied from the ASCONF into the Error
Cause.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 15
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cause Code=0x00A1 | Cause Length=Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ TLV-Copied-From-ASCONF /
/ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
An example of a failed addition in an Error Cause TLV would look as
follows in the response ASCONF-ACK message:
+--------------------------------+
| Type = 0xC003 | Length = 28 |
+--------------------------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023474 |
+--------------------------------+
| Cause=0x00A1 | Length = 20 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Type=0xC001 | Length = 16 |
+--------------------------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023474 |
+--------------------------------+
| Type=0x0005 | Length = 8 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Value=0xC0000201 |
+----------------+---------------+
4.3.3. Error Cause: Request to Delete Source IP Address
Cause of error
Request to Delete Source IP Address: The receiver of this error sent
a request to delete the source IP address of the ASCONF message.
This error indicates that the request is rejected.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cause Code=0x00A2 | Cause Length=Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ TLV-Copied-From-ASCONF /
/ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 16
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
An example of a failed delete in an Error Cause TLV would look as
follows in the response ASCONF-ACK message:
+--------------------------------+
| Type = 0xC003 | Length = 28 |
+--------------------------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023476 |
+--------------------------------+
| Cause=0x00A2 | Length = 20 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Type=0xC002 | Length = 16 |
+----------------+---------------+
| C-ID = 0x01023476 |
+--------------------------------+
| Type=0x0005 | Length = 8 |
+----------------+---------------+
| Value=0xC0000201 |
+----------------+---------------+
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: It is unlikely that an endpoint would source a
packet from the address being deleted, unless the endpoint does not
do proper source address selection.
4.3.4. Error Cause: Association Aborted Due to Illegal ASCONF-ACK
This error is to be included in an ABORT that is generated due to the
reception of an ASCONF-ACK that was not expected but is larger than
the current Sequence Number (see Section 5.3, Rule F0 ). Note that a
Sequence Number is larger than the last acked Sequence Number if it
is either the next sequence or no more than 2**31-1 greater than the
current Sequence Number. Sequence Numbers smaller than the last
acked Sequence Number are silently ignored.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cause Code=0x00A3 | Cause Length=4 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
4.3.5. Error Cause: Request Refused - No Authorization.
Cause of error
This Error Cause may be included to reject a request based on local
security policies.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 17
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Cause Code=0x00A4 | Cause Length=Variable |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ TLV-Copied-From-ASCONF /
/ \
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
5. Procedures
This section will lay out the specific procedures for address-
configuration change chunk type and its processing.
5.1. ASCONF Chunk Procedures
When an endpoint has an ASCONF signaled change to be sent to the
remote endpoint, it MUST do the following:
A1) Create an ASCONF Chunk as defined in Section 4.1.1. The chunk
MUST contain all of the TLV(s) of information necessary to be
sent to the remote endpoint, and unique correlation identities
for each request.
A2) A Sequence Number MUST be assigned to the Chunk. The Sequence
Number MUST be larger by one. The Sequence Number MUST be
initialized at the start of the association to the same value as
the Initial Transmission Sequence Number (TSN) and every time a
new ASCONF Chunk is created, it MUST be incremented by one after
assigning the Sequence Number to the newly created chunk.
A3) If no SCTP packet with one or more ASCONF Chunk(s) is
outstanding (unacknowledged) with the remote peer, send the
chunk and proceed to step A4. If an ASCONF chunk is
outstanding, then the ASCONF chunk should be queued for later
transmission and no further action should be taken until the
previous ASCONF is acknowledged or a timeout occurs.
A4) The sender MUST Start a T-4 Retransmission Timeout (RTO) timer,
using the RTO value of the selected destination address
(normally the primary path; see [RFC 4960], Section 6.4 for
details).
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 18
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
A5) When the ASCONF-ACK that acknowledges the Sequence Number last
sent arrives, the sender MUST stop the T-4 RTO timer, and clear
the appropriate association and destination error counters as
defined in [RFC 4960], Sections 8.1 and 8.2.
A6) The endpoint MUST process all of the TLVs within the ASCONF-
ACK(s) to find out particular status information returned to the
various requests that were sent. Use the Correlation IDs to
correlate the request and the responses.
A7) If an error response is received for a TLV parameter, all TLVs
with no response before the failed TLV are considered successful
if not reported. All TLVs after the failed response are
considered unsuccessful unless a specific success indication is
present for the parameter.
A8) If there is no response(s) to specific TLV parameter(s), and no
failures are indicated, then all request(s) are considered
successful.
A9) If the peer responds to an ASCONF with an ERROR Chunk reporting
that it did not recognize the ASCONF Chunk Type, the sender of
the ASCONF MUST NOT send any further ASCONF Chunks and MUST stop
its T-4 timer.
If the T-4 RTO timer expires the endpoint MUST do the following:
B1) Increment the error counters and perform path failure detection
on the appropriate destination address as defined in [RFC 4960],
Sections 8.1 and 8.2.
B2) Increment the association error counters and perform endpoint
failure detection on the association as defined in [RFC 4960],
Sections 8.1 and 8.2.
B3) Backoff the destination address RTO value to which the ASCONF
chunk was sent by doubling the RTO timer value.
Note: The RTO value is used in the setting of all timer types
for SCTP. Each destination address has a single RTO estimate.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 19
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
B4) Re-transmit the ASCONF Chunk last sent and if possible choose an
alternate destination address (please refer to [RFC 4960],
Section 6.4.1). An endpoint MUST NOT add new parameters to this
chunk; it MUST be the same (including its Sequence Number) as
the last ASCONF sent. An endpoint MAY, however, bundle an
additional ASCONF with new ASCONF parameters with the next
Sequence Number. For details, see Section 5.5.
B5) Restart the T-4 RTO timer. Note that if a different destination
is selected, then the RTO used will be that of the new
destination address.
Note: The total number of retransmissions is limited by B2 above. If
the maximum is reached, the association will fail and enter into the
CLOSED state (see [RFC 4960], Section 6.4.1 for details).
5.1.1. Congestion Control of ASCONF Chunks
In defining the ASCONF Chunk transfer procedures, it is essential
that these transfers MUST NOT cause congestion within the network.
To achieve this, we place these restrictions on the transfer of
ASCONF Chunks:
C1) One and only one SCTP packet-holding ASCONF Chunk(s) MAY be in
transit and unacknowledged at any one time. If a sender, after
sending an ASCONF chunk, decides it needs to transfer another
ASCONF Chunk, it MUST wait until the ASCONF-ACK Chunk returns
from the previous ASCONF Chunk before sending a subsequent
ASCONF. Note: This restriction binds each side, so at any time,
two ASCONF may be in-transit on any given association (one sent
from each endpoint). However, when an ASCONF Chunk is
retransmitted due to a time-out, the additionally held ASCONF
Chunks can be bundled into the retransmission packet as
described in Section 5.5.
C2) An ASCONF Chunk may be bundled with any other chunk type
including other ASCONF Chunks. If bundled with other ASCONF
Chunks, the chunks MUST appear in sequential order with respect
to their Sequence Number.
C3) An ASCONF-ACK Chunk may be bundled with any other chunk type
including other ASCONF-ACK Chunks. If bundled with other
ASCONF-ACK Chunks, the chunks MUST appear in sequential order
with respect to their Sequence Number.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 20
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
C4) Both ASCONF and ASCONF-ACK Chunks MUST NOT be sent in any SCTP
state except ESTABLISHED, SHUTDOWN-PENDING, SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED,
and SHUTDOWN-SENT.
C5) An ASCONF Chunk and an ASCONF-ACK Chunk SHOULD not be larger
than the PMTU. If the PMTU is unknown, then the PMTU should be
set to the minimum PMTU. The minimum PMTU depends on the IP
version used for transmission, and is the lesser of 576 octets
and the first-hop MTU for IPv4 [RFC 1122] and 1280 octets for
IPv6 [RFC 2460].
An ASCONF sender without these restrictions could possibly flood the
network with a large number of separate address-change operations,
thus causing network congestion.
If the sender of an ASCONF Chunk receives an Operational Error
indicating that the ASCONF Chunk Type is not understood, then the
sender MUST NOT send subsequent ASCONF Chunks to the peer. The
endpoint should also inform the upper-layer application that the peer
endpoint does not support any of the extensions detailed in this
document.
5.2. Upon Reception of an ASCONF Chunk
When an endpoint receives an ASCONF Chunk from the remote peer,
special procedures may be needed to identify the association the
ASCONF Chunk is associated with. To properly find the association,
the following procedures SHOULD be followed:
D1) Use the source address and port number of the sender to attempt
to identify the association (i.e., use the same method defined
in [RFC 4960] used for all other SCTP Chunks). If found proceed
to rule D4.
D2) If the association is not found, use the address found in the
Address Parameter TLV combined with the port number found in the
SCTP common header. If found, proceed to rule D4.
D2-ext) If more than one ASCONF Chunks are packed together, use the
address found in the ASCONF Address Parameter TLV of each of
the subsequent ASCONF Chunks. If found, proceed to rule D4.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 21
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
D3) If neither D1, D2, nor D2-ext locates the association, treat the
chunk as an Out Of The Blue packet as defined in [RFC 4960].
D4) Follow the normal rules to validate the SCTP verification tag
found in [RFC 4960].
D5) After the verification tag has been validated, normal chunk
processing should occur. Prior to finding the ASCONF chunk, the
receiver MUST encounter an AUTH chunk as described in [RFC 4895].
If either authentication fails, or the AUTH chunk is missing,
the receiver MUST silently discard this chunk and the rest of
the packet.
After identification and verification of the association, the
following should be performed to properly process the ASCONF Chunk:
E1) If the value found in the Sequence Number of the ASCONF Chunk is
equal to the ('Peer-Sequence-Number' + 1) and the Sequence
Number of the ASCONF Chunk is the first in the SCTP Packet, the
endpoint MAY clean any old cached ASCONF-ACK up to the 'Peer-
Sequence-Number' and then proceed to rule E4.
E1-ext) If the value found in the Sequence Number of the ASCONF
Chunk is equal to the ('Peer-Sequence-Number' + 1) and the
ASCONF chunk is NOT the first Sequence Number in the SCTP
packet, proceed to rule E4 but do NOT clear any cached
ASCONF- ACK or state information.
E2) If the value found in the Sequence Number is less than the
('Peer- Sequence-Number' + 1), simply skip to the next ASCONF,
and include in the outbound response packet any previously
cached ASCONF-ACK response that was sent and saved that matches
the Sequence Number of the ASCONF. Note: It is possible that no
cached ASCONF-ACK Chunk exists. This will occur when an older
ASCONF arrives out of order. In such a case, the receiver
should skip the ASCONF Chunk and not include ASCONF-ACK Chunk
for that chunk.
E3) Then, process each ASCONF one by one as above while the Sequence
Number of the ASCONF is less than the ('Peer-Sequence-Number' +
1).
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 22
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
E4) When the Sequence Number matches the next one expected, process
the ASCONF as described below and after processing the ASCONF
Chunk, append an ASCONF-ACK Chunk to the response packet and
cache a copy of it (in the event it later needs to be
retransmitted).
V1) Process the TLVs contained within the Chunk performing the
appropriate actions as indicated by each TLV type. The
TLVs MUST be processed in order within the Chunk. For
example, if the sender puts 3 TLVs in one chunk, the first
TLV (the one closest to the Chunk Header) in the Chunk MUST
be processed first. The next TLV in the chunk (the middle
one) MUST be processed second and finally, the last TLV in
the Chunk MUST be processed last.
V2) In processing the chunk, the receiver should build a
response message with the appropriate error TLVs, as
specified in the Parameter type bits, for any ASCONF
Parameter it does not understand. To indicate an
unrecognized parameter, Cause Type 8 should be used as
defined in the ERROR in Section 3.3.10.8, [RFC 4960]. The
endpoint may also use the response to carry rejections for
other reasons, such as resource shortages, etc., using the
Error Cause TLV and an appropriate error condition.
Note: A positive response is implied if no error is indicated by
the sender.
V3) All responses MUST copy the ASCONF-Request Correlation ID
field received in the ASCONF parameter from the TLV being
responded to, into the ASCONF-Request Correlation ID field
in the response parameter.
V4) After processing the entire Chunk, the receiver of the
ASCONF MUST queue the response ASCONF-ACK Chunk for
transmission after the rest of the SCTP packet has been
processed. This allows the ASCONF-ACK Chunk to be bundled
with other ASCONF-ACK Chunks as well as any additional
responses, e.g., a Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) Chunk.
V5) Update the 'Peer-Sequence-Number' to the value found in the
Sequence Number field.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 23
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
E5) Otherwise, the ASCONF Chunk is discarded since it must be either
a stale packet or from an attacker. A receiver of such a packet
MAY log the event for security purposes.
E6) When all ASCONF Chunks are processed for this SCTP packet, send
back the accumulated single response packet with all of the
ASCONF-ACK Chunks. The destination address of the SCTP packet
containing the ASCONF-ACK Chunks MUST be the source address of
the SCTP packet that held the ASCONF Chunks.
E7) While processing the ASCONF Chunks in the SCTP packet, if the
response packet will exceed the PMTU of the return path, the
receiver MUST stop adding additional ASCONF-ACKs into the
response packet but MUST continue to process all of the ASCONF
Chunks, saving ASCONF-ACK Chunk responses in its cached copy.
The sender of the ASCONF Chunk will later retransmit the ASCONF
Chunks that were not responded to, at which time the cached
copies of the responses that would NOT fit in the PMTU can be
sent to the peer.
Note: These rules have been presented with the assumption that the
implementation is caching old ASCONF-ACKs in case of loss of SCTP
packets in the ACK path. It is allowable for an implementation to
maintain this state in another form it deems appropriate, as long as
that form results in the same ASCONF-ACK sequences being returned to
the peer as outlined above.
5.3. General Rules for Address Manipulation
When building TLV parameters for the ASCONF Chunk that will add or
delete IP addresses, the following rules MUST be applied:
F0) If an endpoint receives an ASCONF-ACK that is greater than or
equal to the next Sequence Number to be used but no ASCONF Chunk
is outstanding, the endpoint MUST ABORT the association. Note
that a Sequence Number is greater than if it is no more than
2^^31-1 larger than the current Sequence Number (using serial
arithmetic).
F1) When adding an IP address to an association, the IP address is
NOT considered fully added to the association until the ASCONF-
ACK arrives. This means that until such time as the ASCONF
containing the add is acknowledged, the sender MUST NOT use the
new IP address as a source for ANY SCTP packet except on
carrying an ASCONF Chunk. The receiver of the Add IP Address
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 24
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
request may use the address as a destination immediately. The
receiver MUST use the path-verification procedure for the added
address before using that address. The receiver MUST NOT send
packets to the new address except for the corresponding ASCONF-
ACK Chunk or HEARTBEAT Chunks for path verification before the
new path is verified. If the ASCONF-ACK is sent to the new
address, it MAY be bundled with the HEARTBEAT chunk for path
verification.
F2) After the ASCONF-ACK of an IP address Add arrives, the endpoint
MAY begin using the added IP address as a source address for any
type of SCTP chunk.
F3a) If an endpoint receives an Error Cause TLV indicating that the
IP address Add or IP address Deletion parameters was not
understood, the endpoint MUST consider the operation failed and
MUST NOT attempt to send any subsequent Add or Delete requests
to the peer.
F3b) If an endpoint receives an Error Cause TLV indicating that the
IP address Set Primary IP Address parameter was not understood,
the endpoint MUST consider the operation failed and MUST NOT
attempt to send any subsequent Set Primary IP Address requests
to the peer.
F4) When deleting an IP address from an association, the IP address
MUST be considered a valid destination address for the reception
of SCTP packets until the ASCONF-ACK arrives and MUST NOT be
used as a source address for any subsequent packets. This means
that any datagrams that arrive before the ASCONF-ACK destined to
the IP address being deleted MUST be considered part of the
current association. One special consideration is that ABORT
Chunks arriving destined to the IP address being deleted MUST be
ignored (see Section 5.3.1 for further details).
F5) An endpoint MUST NOT delete its last remaining IP address from
an association. In other words, if an endpoint is NOT multi-
homed, it MUST NOT use the delete IP address without an Add IP
Address preceding the delete parameter in the ASCONF Chunk. Or,
if an endpoint sends multiple requests to delete IP addresses,
it MUST NOT delete all of the IP addresses that the peer has
listed for the requester.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 25
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
F6) An endpoint MUST NOT set an IP header source address for an SCTP
packet holding the ASCONF Chunk to be the same as an address
being deleted by the ASCONF Chunk.
F7) If a request is received to delete the last remaining IP address
of a peer endpoint, the receiver MUST send an Error Cause TLV
with the Error Cause set to the new error code 'Request to
Delete Last Remaining IP Address'. The requested delete MUST
NOT be performed or acted upon, other than to send the ASCONF-
ACK.
F8) If a request is received to delete an IP address that is also
the source address of the IP packet that contained the ASCONF
chunk, the receiver MUST reject this request. To reject the
request, the receiver MUST send an Error Cause TLV set to the
new error code 'Request to Delete Source IP Address' (unless
Rule F5 has also been violated, in which case the error code
'Request to Delete Last Remaining IP Address' is sent).
F9) If an endpoint receives an ADD IP Address request and does not
have the local resources to add this new address to the
association, it MUST return an Error Cause TLV set to the new
error code 'Operation Refused Due to Resource Shortage'.
F10) If an endpoint receives an 'Out of Resource' error in response
to its request to ADD an IP address to an association, it must
either ABORT the association or not consider the address part of
the association. In other words, if the endpoint does not ABORT
the association, it must consider the add attempt failed and NOT
use this address since its peer will treat SCTP packets destined
to the address as Out Of The Blue packets.
F11) When an endpoint receives an ASCONF to add an IP address sends
an 'Out of Resource' in its response, it MUST also fail any
subsequent add or delete requests bundled in the ASCONF. The
receiver MUST NOT reject an ADD and then accept a subsequent
DELETE of an IP address in the same ASCONF Chunk. In other
words, once a receiver begins failing any ADD or DELETE request,
it must fail all subsequent ADD or DELETE requests contained in
that single ASCONF.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 26
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
F12) When an endpoint receives a request to delete an IP address that
is the current primary address, it is an implementation decision
as to how that endpoint chooses the new primary address.
F13) When an endpoint receives a valid request to DELETE an IP
address, the endpoint MUST consider the address no longer part
of the association. It MUST NOT send SCTP packets for the
association to that address and it MUST treat subsequent packets
received from that address as Out Of The Blue.
During the time interval between sending out the ASCONF and
receiving the ASCONF-ACK, it MAY be possible to receive DATA
Chunks out of order. The following examples illustrate these
problems:
F14) All addresses added by the reception of an ASCONF Chunk MUST be
put into the UNCONFIRMED state and MUST have path verification
performed on them before the address can be used as described in
[RFC 4960], Section 5.4.
Endpoint-A Endpoint-Z
---------- ----------
ASCONF[Add-IP:X]------------------------------>
/--ASCONF-ACK
/
/--------/---New DATA:
/ / Destination
<-------------------/ / IP:X
/
<--------------------------/
In the above example, we see a new IP address (X) being added to the
Endpoint-A. However, due to packet re-ordering in the network, a new
DATA chunk is sent and arrives at Endpoint-A before the ASCONF-ACK
confirms the add of the address to the association.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 27
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
A similar problem exists with the deletion of an IP address as
follows:
Endpoint-A Endpoint-Z
---------- ----------
/------------New DATA:
/ Destination
/ IP:X
ASCONF [DEL-IP:X]---------/---------------->
<-----------------/------------------ASCONF-ACK
/
/
<-------------/
In this example, we see a DATA chunk destined to the IP:X (which is
about to be deleted) arriving after the deletion is complete. For
the ADD case, an endpoint SHOULD consider the newly added IP address
for the purpose of sending data to the association before the ASCONF-
ACK has been received. The endpoint MUST NOT source data from this
new address until the ASCONF-ACK arrives, but it may receive out-of-
order data as illustrated and MUST NOT treat this data as an OOTB
datagram (please see [RFC 4960] section 8.4). It MAY drop the data
silently or it MAY consider it part of the association, but it MUST
NOT respond with an ABORT.
For the DELETE case, an endpoint MAY respond to the late-arriving
DATA packet as an OOTB datagram or it MAY hold the deleting IP
address for a small period of time as still valid. If it treats the
DATA packet as OOTB, the peer will silently discard the ABORT (since
by the time the ABORT is sent, the peer will have removed the IP
address from this association). If the endpoint elects to hold the
IP address valid for a period of time, it MUST NOT hold it valid
longer than 2 RTO intervals for the destination being removed.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 28
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
5.3.1. A Special Case for OOTB ABORT Chunks
Another case worth mentioning is illustrated below:
Endpoint-A Endpoint-Z
---------- ----------
New DATA:------------\
Source IP:X \
\
ASCONF-REQ[DEL-IP:X]----\------------------>
\ /---------ASCONF-ACK
\ /
\----/-----------> OOTB
(Ignored <---------------------/-------------ABORT
by rule F4) /
<---------------------/
For this case, during the deletion of an IP address, an Abort MUST be
ignored if the destination address of the Abort message is that of a
destination being deleted.
5.3.2. A Special Case for Changing an Address
In some instances, the sender may only have one IP address in an
association that is being renumbered. When this occurs, the sender
may not be able to send the appropriate ADD/DELETE pair to the peer,
and may use the old address as a source in the IP header. For this
reason, the sender MUST fill in the Address Parameter field with an
address that is part of the association (in this case, the one being
deleted). This will allow the receiver to locate the association
without using the source address found in the IP header.
The receiver of such a chunk MUST always first use the source address
found in the IP header in looking up the association. The receiver
should attempt to use the address found in the Address Parameter
field only if the lookup using the source address from the IP header
fails. The receiver MUST reply to the source address of the packet
in this case, which is the new address that was added by the ASCONF
(since the old address is no longer part of the association after
processing).
5.4. Setting of the Primary Address
A sender of the set primary parameter MAY elect to send this combined
with an add or delete of an address. A sender MUST only send a set
primary request to an address that is already considered part of the
association. In other words, if a sender combines a set primary with
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 29
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
an add new IP address request, the set primary will be discarded
unless the add request is to be processed BEFORE the set primary
(i.e., it precedes the set primary).
A request to set primary MAY also appear in an INIT or INIT-ACK
chunk, which can give advice to the peer endpoint as to which of its
addresses the sender of the INIT or INIT-ACK would prefer as the
primary address.
The request to set an address as the primary path is an option the
receiver SHOULD perform. It is considered advice to the receiver of
the best-destination address to use in sending SCTP packets (in the
requester's view). If a request arrives that asks the receiver to
set an address as primary that does not exist, the receiver SHOULD
NOT honor the request, leaving its existing primary address
unchanged.
5.5. Bundling of Multiple ASCONFs
In the normal case, a single ASCONF is sent in a packet and a single
reply ASCONF-ACK is received. However, in the event of the loss of
an SCTP packet containing either an ASCONF or ASCONF-ACK, it is
allowable for a sender to bundle additional ASCONFs in the
retransmission. In bundling multiple ASCONFs, the following rules
MUST be followed:
1. Previously transmitted ASCONF Chunks MUST be left unchanged.
2. Each SCTP packet containing ASCONF Chunks MUST be bundled
starting with the smallest ASCONF Sequence Number first in the
packet (closest to the Chunk header) and preceding in sequential
order from the lowest to highest ASCONF Sequence Number.
3. All ASCONFs within the packet MUST be adjacent to each other,
i.e., no other chunk type must separate the ASCONFs.
4. Each new ASCONF lookup address MUST be populated as if the
previous ASCONFs had been processed and accepted.
6. Security Considerations
The addition and or deletion of an IP address to an existing
association does provide an additional mechanism by which existing
associations can be hijacked. Therefore, this document requires the
use of the authentication mechanism defined in [RFC 4895] to limit the
ability of an attacker to hijack an association.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 30
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Hijacking an association by using the addition and deletion of an IP
address is only possible for an attacker who is able to intercept the
initial two packets of the association setup when the SCTP-AUTH
extension is used without pre-shared keys. If such a threat is
considered a possibility, then the [RFC 4895] extension MUST be used
with a preconfigured shared endpoint pair key to mitigate this
threat. For a more detailed analysis, see [RFC 4895].
When the address parameter in ASCONF chunks with Add, IP Delete IP,
or Set Primary IP parameters is a wildcard, the source address of the
packet is used. This address is not protected by SCTP-AUTH [RFC 4895]
and an attacker can therefore intercept such a packet and modify the
source address. Even if the source address is not one presently an
alternate for the association, the identification of the association
may rely on the other information in the packet (perhaps the
verification tag, for example). An on-path attacker can therefore
modify the source address to its liking.
If the ASCONF includes an Add IP with a wildcard address, the
attacker can add an address of its liking, which provides little
immediate damage but can set up later attacks.
If the ASCONF includes a Delete IP with a wildcard address, the
attacker can cause all addresses but one of its choosing to be
deleted from an association. The address supplied by the attacker
must already belong to the association, which makes this more
difficult for the attacker. However, the sole remaining address
might be one that the attacker controls, for example, or can monitor,
etc. In the least, the sender and the deceived receiver would have
different ideas of what that sole remaining address would be. This
will eventually cause the association to fail, but in the meantime,
the deceived receiver could be transmitting packets to an address the
sender did not intend.
If the ASCONF includes a Set Primary IP with a wildcard address, then
the attacker can cause an address to be used as a primary address.
This is limited to an address that already belongs to the
association, so the damage is limited. At least, the result would be
that the recipient is using a primary address that the sender did not
intend. However, if both a wildcard Add IP and a wildcard Set
Primary IP are used, then the attacker can modify the source address
to both add an address to its liking to the association and make it
the primary address. Such a combination would present the attacker
with an opportunity for more damage.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 31
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Note that all these attacks are from an on-path attacker. Endpoints
that believe they face a threat from on-path attackers SHOULD NOT use
wildcard addresses in ASCONF Add IP, Delete IP, or Set Primary IP
parameters.
If an SCTP endpoint that supports this extension receives an INIT
that indicates that the peer supports the ASCONF extension but does
NOT support the [RFC 4895] extension, the receiver of such an INIT
MUST send an ABORT in response. Note that an implementation is
allowed to silently discard such an INIT as an option as well, but
under NO circumstance is an implementation allowed to proceed with
the association setup by sending an INIT-ACK in response.
An implementation that receives an INIT-ACK that indicates that the
peer does not support the [RFC 4895] extension MUST NOT send the
COOKIE-ECHO to establish the association. Instead, the
implementation MUST discard the INIT-ACK and report to the upper-
layer user that an association cannot be established destroying the
Transmission Control Block (TCB).
Other types of attacks, e.g., bombing, are discussed in detail in
[RFC 5062]. The bombing attack, in particular, is countered by the
use of a random nonce and is required by [RFC 4960].
An on-path attacker can modify the INIT and INIT-ACK Supported
Extensions parameter (and authentication-related parameters) to
produce a denial of service. If the on-path attacker removes the
[RFC 4895]-related parameters from an INIT that indicates it supports
the ASCONF extension, the association will not be established. If
the on-path attacker adds a Supported Extensions parameter mentioning
the ASCONF type to an INIT or INIT-ACK that does not carry any AUTH-
related parameters, the association will not be established. If the
on-path attacker removes the Supported Extensions parameter (or
removes the ASCONF type from that parameter) from the INIT or the
INIT-ACK, then the association will not be able to use the ADD-IP
feature. If the on-path attacker adds the Supported Extensions
parameter listing the ASCONF type to an INIT-ACK that did not carry
one (but did carry AUTH-related parameters), then the INIT sender may
use ASCONF where the INIT-ACK sender does not support it. This would
be discovered later if the INIT sender transmitted an ASCONF, but the
INIT sender could have made configuration choices at that point. As
the INIT and INIT-ACK are not protected by the AUTH feature, there is
no way to counter such attacks. Note however that an on-path
attacker capable of modifying the INIT and INIT-ACK would almost
certainly also be able to prevent the INIT and INIT-ACK from being
delivered or modify the verification tags or checksum to cause the
packet to be discarded, so the Supported Extensions adds little
additional vulnerability (with respect to preventing association
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 32
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
formation) to the SCTP protocol. The ability to prevent the use of
this new feature is an additional vulnerability to SCTP but only for
this new feature.
The Adaptation Layer Indication is subject to corruption, insertion,
or deletion from the INIT and INIT-ACK chunks by an on-path attacker.
This parameter SHOULD be opaque to the SCTP protocol (see Section
4.2.6), and so changes to the parameter will likely not affect the
SCTP protocol. However, any adaptation layer that is defined SHOULD
consider its own vulnerabilities in the Security Considerations
section of the RFC that defines its adaptation code point.
The Set Primary IP Address parameter is subject to corruption,
insertion, or deletion by an on-path attacker when included in the
INIT and INIT-ACK chunks. The attacker could use this to influence
the receiver to choose an address to its own purposes (one over which
it has control, one that would be less desirable for the sender,
etc.). An on-path attacker would also have the ability to include or
remove addresses for the association from the INIT or INIT-ACK, so it
is not limited in the address it can specify in the Set Primary IP
Address. Endpoints that wish to avoid this possible threat MAY defer
sending the initial Set Primary request and wait until the
association is fully established before sending a fully protected
ASCONF with the Set Primary as its single parameter.
7. IANA Considerations
This document defines the following new SCTP parameters, chunks, and
errors (http://www.iana.org/assignments/sctp-parameters):
o two new chunk types,
o six parameter types, and
o five new SCTP error causes.
The chunk types with their assigned values are shown below.
Chunk Type Chunk Name
--------------------------------------------------------------
0xC1 Address Configuration Change Chunk (ASCONF)
0x80 Address Configuration Acknowledgment (ASCONF-ACK)
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 33
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
The parameter types are listed below:
Parameter Type Parameter Name
-------------------------------------------------
0x8008 Supported Extensions
0xC001 Add IP Address
0xC002 Delete IP Address
0xC003 Error Cause Indication
0xC004 Set Primary Address
0xC005 Success Indication
0xC006 Adaptation Layer Indication
The Error Causes are listed below:
Cause Code
Value Cause Code
--------- ----------------
0x00A0 Request to Delete Last Remaining IP Address
0x00A1 Operation Refused Due to Resource Shortage
0x00A2 Request to Delete Source IP Address
0x00A3 Association Aborted Due to Illegal ASCONF-ACK
0x00A4 Request Refused - No Authorization
This document also defines an adaptation code point. The adaptation
code point is a 32-bit integer that is assigned by IANA through an
IETF Consensus action as defined in [RFC 2434]. For this new
registry, no initial values are being added by this document;
however, [RDDP] will add the first entry.
8. Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express a special note of thanks to Michael
Ramahlo and Phillip Conrad for their extreme efforts in the early
formation of this draft.
The authors wish to thank Jon Berger, Mark Butler, Lars Eggert,
Janardhan Iyengar, Greg Kendall, Seok Koh, Salvatore Loreto, Peter
Lei, John Loughney, Sandy Murphy, Ivan Arias Rodriguez, Renee Revis,
Marshall Rose, Ronnie Sellars, Chip Sharp, and Irene Ruengeler for
their invaluable comments.
The authors would also like to give special mention to Maria-Carmen
Belinchon and Ian Rytina for their early contributions to this
document and their thoughtful comments.
And a special thanks to James Polk, abstract writer to the few but
lucky.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 34
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC 1122] Braden, R., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, October 1989.
[RFC 1982] Elz, R. and R. Bush, "Serial Number Arithmetic", RFC 1982,
August 1996.
[RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC 2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434,
October 1998.
[RFC 2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
[RFC 4960] Stewart, R., Ed., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol",
RFC 4960, September 2007.
[RFC 4895] Tuexen, M., Stewart, R., Lei, P., and E. Rescorla,
"Authenticated Chunks for the Stream Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP)", RFC 4895, August 2007.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC 5062] Stewart, R., Tuexen, M., and G. Camarillo, "Security
Attacks Found Against SCTP and Current Countermeasures",
RFC 5062, September 2007.
[RDDP] Bestler, C. and R. Stewart, "Stream Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP) Direct Data Placement (DDP) Adaptation",
Work in Progress, September 2006.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 35
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Appendix A. Abstract Address Handling
A.1. General Remarks
This appendix is non-normative. It is present to give the reader a
concise mathematical definition of an SCTP endpoint. The following
text provides a working definition of the endpoint notion to discuss
address reconfiguration. It is not intended to restrict
implementations in any way; its goal is to provide a set of
definitions only. Using these definitions should make a discussion
about address issues easier.
A.2. Generalized Endpoints
A generalized endpoint is a pair of a set of IP addresses and a port
number at any given point of time. The precise definition is as
follows:
A generalized endpoint gE at time t is given by
gE(t) = ({IP1, ..., IPn}, Port)
where {IP1, ..., IPn} is a non-empty set of IP addresses.
Please note that the dynamic addition and deletion of IP addresses
described in this document allows the set of IP addresses of a
generalized endpoint to be changed at some point of time. The port
number can never be changed.
The set of IP addresses of a generalized endpoint gE at a time t is
defined as
Addr(gE)(t) = {IP1, ..., IPn}
if gE(t) = ({IP1, ..., IPn}, Port) holds at time t.
The port number of a generalized endpoint gE is defined as
Port(gE) = Port
if gE(t) = ({IP1, ..., IPn}, Port) holds at time t.
There is one fundamental rule that restricts all generalized
endpoints:
For two different generalized endpoints gE' and gE'' with the same
port number Port(gE') = Port(gE''), the address sets Addr(gE')(t) and
Addr(gE'')(t) must be disjoint at every point in time.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 36
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
A.3. Associations
Associations consist of two generalized endpoints and the two address
sets known by the peer at any time. The precise definition is as
follows:
An association A between two different generalized endpoints gE' and
gE'' is given by
A = (gE', S', gE'', S'')
where S'(t) and S''(t) are a set of addresses at any time t such that
S'(t) is a non-empty subset of Addr(gE')(t) and S''(t) is a non-empty
subset of Addr(gE'')(t).
If A = (gE', S', gE'', S'') is an association between the generalized
endpoints gE' and gE'', the following notion is used:
Addr(A, gE') = S' and Addr(A, gE'') = S''.
If the dependency on time is important the notion Addr(A, gE')(t) =
S'(t) will be used.
If A is an association between gE' and gE'', then Addr(A, gE') is the
subset of IP addresses of gE', which is known by gE'' and used by
gE'.
Association establishment between gE' and gE'' can be seen as:
1. gE' and gE'' do exist before the association.
2. If an INIT has to be sent from gE' to gE'', address-scoping rules
and other limitations are applied to calculate the subset S' from
Addr(gE'). The addresses of S' are included in the INIT chunk.
3. If an INIT-ACK has to be sent from gE'' to gE', address-scoping
rules and other limitations are applied to calculate the subset
S'' from Addr(gE''). The addresses of S'' are included in the
INIT-ACK chunk.
4. After the handshake the association A = (gE', S', gE'', S'') has
been established.
5. Right after the association establishment Addr(A, gE') and
Addr(A, gE'') are the addresses that have been seen on the wire
during the handshake.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 37
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
A.4. Relationship with RFC 4960
[RFC 4960] defines the notion of an endpoint. This subsection will
show that these endpoints are also (special) generalized endpoints.
[RFC 4960] has no notion of address-scoping or other address-handling
limitations and provides no mechanism to change the addresses of an
endpoint.
This means that an endpoint is simply a generalized endpoint that
does not depend on time. Neither the port nor the address list
changes.
During association setup, no address-scoping rules or other
limitations will be applied. This means that for an association A
between two endpoints gE' and gE'', the following is true:
Addr(A, gE') = Addr(gE') and Addr(A, gE'') = Addr(gE'').
A.5. Rules for Address Manipulation
The rules for address manipulation can now be stated in a simple way:
1. An address can be added to a generalized endpoint gE only if this
address is not an address of a different generalized endpoint
with the same port number.
2. An address can be added to an association A with generalized
endpoint gE if it has been added to the generalized endpoint gE
first. This means that the address must be an element of
Addr(gE) first and then it can become an element of Addr(A, gE).
But this is not necessary. If the association does not allow the
reconfiguration of the addresses only Addr(gE) can be modified.
3. An address can be deleted from an association A with generalized
endpoint gE as long as Addr(A, gE) stays non-empty.
4. An address can be deleted from an generalized endpoint gE only if
it has been removed from all associations having gE as a
generalized endpoint.
These rules simply make sure that the rules for the endpoints and
associations given above are always fulfilled.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 38
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Authors' Addresses
Randall R. Stewart
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4875 Forest Drive
Suite 200
Columbia, SC 29206
US
Phone:
EMail: rrs@cisco.com
Qiaobing Xie
Motorola, Inc.
1501 W. Shure Drive, 2-3C
Arlington Heights, IL 60004
USA
Phone: +1-847-632-3028
EMail: Qiaobing.Xie@motorola.com
Michael Tuexen
Univ. of Applied Sciences Muenster
Stegerwaldstr. 39
48565 Steinfurt
Germany
EMail: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
Shin Maruyama
Kyoto University
Yoshida-Honmachi
Sakyo-ku
Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8501
JAPAN
Phone: +81-75-753-7417
EMail: mail@marushin.gr.jp
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 39
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Masahiro Kozuka
Kyoto University
Yoshida-Honmachi
Sakyo-ku
Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8501
JAPAN
Phone: +81-75-753-7417
EMail: ma-kun@kozuka.jp
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 40
RFC 5061 SCTP Dynamic Address Reconfiguration September 2007
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright © The IETF Trust (2007).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Stewart, et al. Standards Track PAGE 41
Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration
RFC TOTAL SIZE: 91851 bytes
PUBLICATION DATE: Friday, September 21st, 2007
LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)
|
