The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 4617   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 4617

A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Formal Namespace for the Latvian National Government Integration Project

Last modified on Wednesday, August 16th, 2006

Permanent link to RFC 4617
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 4617
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 4617







Network Working Group                                      J. Kornijenko
Request for Comments: 4617                                  ABC software
Category: Informational                                    August 2006


          A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Formal Namespace for
          the Latvian National Government Integration Project

 Status of This Memo

   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does
   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this
   memo is unlimited.

 Copyright Notice

   Copyright © The Internet Society (2006).

 Abstract

   This document describes a Uniform Resource Name (URN) namespace that
   is engineered by a consortium (general contractor, Olimps LTD, and
   subcontractors, ABC software LTD, Microsoft Latvia LTD, Riga Internet
   eXchange (RIX) Technologies LTD, and Microlink LTD) for naming
   information resources published and produced by the Latvian National
   Government Integration Project (Latvian abbreviation IVIS).

 Table of Contents

   1. Introduction ....................................................2
   2. Specification Template ..........................................2
   3. Example .........................................................4
   4. Community Considerations ........................................4
   5. IANA Considerations .............................................4
   6. Namespace Considerations ........................................5
   7. Security Considerations .........................................5
   8. Acknowledgements ................................................5
   9. References ......................................................6
      9.1. Normative References .......................................6
      9.2. Informative References .....................................6











Kornijenko                   Informational                   PAGE 1 top


RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 1. Introduction The IVIS uses and produces many kinds of information resources such as E-services, E-service instances, specifications, standards, working documents, and XML schemas. An ID in IVIS has to be unique for global use every time. 2. Specification Template Namespace ID: "IVIS" requested according to [RFC 3406]. Registration information: Registration Version Number: 1 Registration Date: 2006-MM-DD Declared registrant of the namespace: Organization: ABC software LTD on behalf of The Secretariat of the Special Assignments Minister for Electronic Government Affairs Name: Jurijs Kornijenko Title: Software Architect Address: Tallinas - 51, Riga, LV-1012 Phone: +371 7082635 Email: j.kornienko@abcsoftware.lv Declaration of structure: The Namespace Specific String (NSS) of all URNs assigned by the IVIS will have the following hierarchical structure (ABNF, according to [RFC 4234]): <NID> ::= "IVIS" <NSS> ::= <IVIS Org ID>:<ResID - suffix> <IVIS Org ID> ::= 1*<number> { subsystem ID from IVIS database} <ResID - suffix> ::= 1*(<upper> | <lower> | <number> | <other>) {an ID generated by IVIS subsystem that is unique within this subsystem} Kornijenko Informational PAGE 2 top

RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 <other> ::= "(" | ")" | "+" | "," | "-" | "." | "=" | "@" | ";" | "$" | "_" | "!" | "*" <upper> ::= "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E" | "F" | "G" | "H" | "I" | "J" | "K" | "L" | "M" | "N" | "O" | "P" | "Q" | "R" | "S" | "T" | "U" | "V" | "W" | "X" | "Y" | "Z" <lower> ::= "a" | "b" | "c" | "d" | "e" | "f" | "g" | "h" | "i" | "j" | "k" | "l" | "m" | "n" | "o" | "p" | "q" | "r" | "s" | "t" | "u" | "v" | "w" | "x" | "y" | "z" <number> ::= "0" | "1" | "2" | "3" | "4" | "5" | "6" | "7" | "8" | "9" Relevant ancillary documentation: IVIS ancillary documentation is under development. Identifier uniqueness considerations: Uniqueness is guaranteed by the IVIS that issues the numbers. The numbers are not reassigned. Identifier persistence considerations: Persistence of identifiers is dependent upon the persistence of the system name assignment by system name holders. Process of identifier assignment: All the assignments of identifiers are fully controlled and managed by the IVIS and its subsystems. Process of identifier resolution: The holders of system names are responsible for operating or delegating resolution servers for the system in which they have assigned URNs. Rules for Lexical Equivalence: The entire URN is case insensitive. Kornijenko Informational PAGE 3 top

RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 Conformity with URN syntax: IVIS schema URN fully conforms to [RFC 2141] syntax, except that symbols "'" and ":" were excluded from <other>. Validation mechanism: <IVIS Org ID> could be validated by using a special IVIS database service. <ResID - suffix> could be validated by an appropriate subsystem. Scope: Global. 3. Example The following examples are not to be real. They are provided for pedagogical purposes only. URN:IVIS:000000:DOC-METADATA URN:IVIS:000000:NDR1021365 4. Community Considerations Every Latvian ministry's local authority produces many kinds of different documents, offers public services. Each of the information resources is already uniquely identified within an authority- producer. The IVIS URN namespace helps unify information resource identifiers by using existent Latvian government authority identification procedures to produce E-services and different documents where many parties are involved. Any citizen or organization with Internet web browser capability will be entitled to access the namespace and its associated application, registration, and resolution services. The primary IVIS namespace usage is to identify information resources, such as XML messages, their schemas, and other resources, which can be public or have a special destination, when a few different parties are involved in the interchange. 5. IANA Considerations This document includes a RUN Network Identifier (NID) registration for IVIS for entry in the IANA registry of URN NIDs (see [RFC 2434] for more information). Kornijenko Informational PAGE 4 top

RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 6. Namespace Considerations To select necessary identifier schema, we spend a lot time and decided on URN, because an IVIS URN namespace has to resolve the following problems: - Information resource uniqueness Uniqueness makes it possible to find a necessary resource and call it anytime. Uniqueness gives stability in message sending and storing operations. - Namespace understandability IVIS URN consists of parts, which can guarantee namespace legibility. - Information resource resolution One of the IVIS namespace parts identifies the place where the resource can be found (resolved). Therefore, a new URN assignment is required, and individual URNs shall be assigned through the process of development of each XML schema. 7. Security Considerations There are no additional security considerations besides those normally associated with the use and resolution of URNs in general. 8. Acknowledgements Since the specification described in this document is derived from [RFC 3305], [RFC 3616], [RFC 3986], [RFC 3622], and [RFC 3406] the acknowledgements in those documents still apply. In addition, the author wishes to acknowledge Leslie Daigle, Ted Hardie, and Dinara Suleymanova for their suggestions and review. Kornijenko Informational PAGE 5 top

RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 9. References 9.1. Normative References [RFC 3406] Daigle, L., van Gulik, D., Iannella, R., and P. Faltstrom, "Uniform Resource Names (URN) Namespace Definition Mechanisms", BCP 66, RFC 3406, October 2002. [RFC 3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005. 9.2. Informative References [RFC 2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998. [RFC 3305] Mealling, M. and R. Denenberg, "Report from the Joint W3C/IETF URI Planning Interest Group: Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs), URLs, and Uniform Resource Names (URNs): Clarifications and Recommendations", RFC 3305, August 2002. [RFC 3616] Bellifemine, F., Constantinescu, I., and S. Willmott, "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA)", RFC 3616, September 2003. [RFC 3622] Mealling, M., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Liberty Alliance Project", RFC 3622, February 2004. [W3C/IETF] URI Planning Interest Group, W3C/IETF September 2001, <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-uri-clarification- 20010921/>http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-uri- clarification-20010921/. [RFC 2141] Moats, R., "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, May 1997. [RFC 4234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", RFC 4234, October 2005. Kornijenko Informational PAGE 6 top

RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 Author's Address Jurijs Kornijenko ABC software LTD Software Architect Tallinas - 51 Riga, LV-1012 Phone: +371 7082635 EMail: j.kornienko@abcsoftware.lv Kornijenko Informational PAGE 7 top

RFC 4617 IVIS URN Definition August 2006 Full Copyright Statement Copyright © The Internet Society (2006). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA). Kornijenko Informational PAGE 8 top

A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Formal Namespace for the Latvian National Government Integration Project RFC TOTAL SIZE: 12934 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Wednesday, August 16th, 2006 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 4617: The IETF Trust, Wednesday, August 16th, 2006
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement