|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 415
Tenex bandwidth Last modified on Monday, May 14th, 2001 Permanent link to RFC 415 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 415 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 415 Network Working Group H. Murray Request for Comments: 415 Stanford Research Institute NIC: 392 29 November 1972 TENEX BANDWIDTH NIC 11584 (RFC 392) BY G. HICKS AND B. WESSLER AT UTAH RECENTLY DISCUSSED THE COST OF USING THE NETWORK. I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THESE SAME TYPES OF NUMBERS AND LOOK AT THEM FROM ANOTHER POINT OF VIEW. WITHOUT CALCULATING COSTS, LET US CONSIDER ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE OF THE HOSTS. I WROTE A SIMPLE TENEX PROGRAM THAT SENT ITSELF STRINGS OVER THE NET. IT USED BIN/BOUT AND THE BUFFERED SEND MODE. IT COUNTED THINGS, BUT DID NOT PROCESS THE STRING. WITH SAMPLES OF A MILLION BITS, THE FOLLOWING RESULTS WERE OBTAINED. BYTES/SIZE REAL BAUD CPU BAUD CPU NEEDED 50/36 48.8K 291K 16% 100/36 46.5K 309K 15% 200/36 52.7K 322K 16% 400/36 59.3K 267K 22% 800/36 61.1K 279K 21% 50/8 22.0K 70K 31% 100/8 26.7K 76K 35% 200/8 29.0K 79K 36% 400/8 30.0K 81K 37% 800/8 31.9K 78K 40% 1600/8 38.1K 64K 59% 3200/8 41.8K 59K 70% THE FOLLOWING WERE OBTAINED BY USING SIN/SOUT WITHOUT THE BUFFERED MODE. BYTES/SIZE REAL BAUD CPU BAUD CPU NEEDED 50/36 36K 95K 38% 100/36 44K 95K 45% 200/36 49K 92K 53% 400/36 54K 90K 60% 50/8 12K 22K 57% 100/8 16K 21K 75% 200/8 18K 20K 92% 400/8 20K 20K 99% Murray PAGE 1 |