|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 40
More Comments on the Forthcoming Protocol Last modified on Friday, June 27th, 1997 Permanent link to RFC 40 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 40 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 40 Network Working Group E. Harslem Request for Comments: 40 J. Heafner RAND March 1970 More Comments on the Forthcoming Protocol We have recently discussed NWG/RFC Nos. 36 and 39 with Steve Crocker, UCLA. Steve has asked that we elaborate on the errors, queries, and HOST status that were mentioned in NWG/RFC #39. Please voice your opinions soon in order to affect the forthcoming protocol specifications. ERROR MESSAGES <ERR> <Code> <Command length> <Command in error> <Code> is an eight-bit field that specifies the error type. The assigned codes are shown below. <Command length> is a 16-bit integer that indicates the length of the <Command in error> in bits. The <Command in error> is the spurious command. The ranges of <Code> are shown below in hexidecimal. 00 Unspecified error types 10-0F Resource errors 10-1F Status errors 20-2F Content errors 30-3F Unused Specific values of <Code> are shown below with their meaning. <Code> value Semantics 00 Unspecified errors. 01 Request for an invalid resource. 02 Request for an exhausted resource, try later. 03-0F Unused. 10 Invalid <RSM>, i.e., link connected but unblocked. 11 Invalid <SPD>. 12 Invalid <ASG>, i.e., connected but no <RDY> received. PAGE 1 |