|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 2100
The Naming of Hosts Last modified on Wednesday, April 2nd, 1997 Permanent link to RFC 2100 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 2100 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 2100 Network Working Group J. Ashworth Request for Comments: 2100 Ashworth & Associates Category: Informational 1 April 1997 The Naming of Hosts Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Introduction This RFC is a commentary on the difficulty of deciding upon an acceptably distinctive hostname for one's computer, a problem which grows in direct proportion to the logarithmically increasing size of the Internet. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Except to TS Eliot. And, for that matter, to David Addison, who hates iambic pentameter. Poetry The Naming of Hosts is a difficult matter, It isn't just one of your holiday games; You may think at first I'm as mad as a hatter When I tell you, a host must have THREE DIFFERENT NAMES. First of all, there's the name that the users use daily, Such as venus, athena, and cisco, and ames, Such as titan or sirius, hobbes or europa-- All of them sensible everyday names. There are fancier names if you think they sound sweeter, Some for the web pages, some for the flames: Such as mercury, phoenix, orion, and charon-- But all of them sensible everyday names. But I tell you, a host needs a name that's particular, A name that's peculiar, and more dignified, Else how can it keep its home page perpendicular, And spread out its data, send pages world wide? Ashworth Informational PAGE 1 |