|
|
|
|
|
|
IETF RFC 1525
Definitions of Managed Objects for Source Routing Bridges
Last modified on Wednesday, September 29th, 1993
 Permanent link to RFC 1525
 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 1525
 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 1525
Network Working Group E. Decker
Request for Comments: 1525 cisco Systems, Inc.
Obsoletes: 1286 K. McCloghrie
Category: Standards Track Hughes LAN Systems, Inc.
P. Langille
DEC
A. Rijsinghani
DEC
September 1993
Definitions of Managed Objects for
Source Routing Bridges
 Status of this Memo
This RFC specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" for the standardization state and status
of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ......................................... 2
2. The Network Management Framework ..................... 2
2.1 Object Definitions .................................. 2
3. Overview ............................................. 2
3.1 Structure of MIB .................................... 3
3.1.1 The dot1dSr Group ................................. 4
3.1.2 The dot1dPortPair Group ........................... 4
3.2 Relationship to Other MIBs .......................... 5
3.2.1 Relationship to the Bridge MIB .................... 5
3.2.2 Relationship to the 'system' group ................ 5
3.2.3 Relationship to the 'interfaces' group ............ 5
4. Changes from RFC 1286 ................................ 6
5. Definitions .......................................... 7
5.1 Groups in the SR MIB ................................ 7
5.2 The dot1dSr Group Definitions ....................... 7
5.3 The dot1dPortPair Group Definitions ................. 14
6. Acknowledgments ...................................... 16
7. References ........................................... 16
8. Security Considerations .............................. 18
9. Authors' Addresses ................................... 18
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 1 
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
1. Introduction
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP based internets.
In particular, it defines objects for managing source routing and
source routing transparent bridges. These bridges are also required
to implement relevant groups in the Bridge MIB [6].
This MIB supersedes the dot1dSr group of objects published in an
earlier version of the Bridge MIB, RFC 1286. Changes have primarily
been made to track changes in the IEEE 802.5M SRT Addendum to the
IEEE 802.1D Standard for MAC Bridges.
2. The Network Management Framework
The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three
components. They are:
o STD 16, RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
describing and naming objects for the purpose of
management. STD 16, RFC 1212 defines a more concise description
mechanism, which is wholly consistent with the SMI.
o STD 17, RFC 1213 defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects
for the Internet suite of protocols.
o STD 15, RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for
network access to managed objects.
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
experimentation and evaluation.
2.1. Object Definitions
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1)
defined in the SMI. In particular, each object object type is named
by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name. The
object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely
identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human
convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to
refer to the object type.
3. Overview
A common device present in many networks is the Bridge. This device
is used to connect Local Area Network segments below the network
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 2
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
layer. There are two major modes defined for this bridging;
transparent and source route. The transparent method of bridging is
defined in the IEEE 802.1d MAC Bridge specification [11]. Source
route bridging has been defined by I.B.M. and is described in the
Token Ring Architecture Reference [12], as well as the IEEE 802.5M
SRT Bridge Operations Addendum [14] to 802.1d. This memo defines
objects needed for management of a source routing bridge, and is an
extension to the SNMP Bridge MIB [6].
An explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible.
This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects
proposed for inclusion:
(1) Start with a small set of essential objects and add only
as further objects are needed.
(2) Require objects be essential for either fault or
configuration management.
(3) Consider evidence of current use and/or utility.
(4) Limit the total of objects.
(5) Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others in
this or other MIBs.
(6) Avoid causing critical sections to be heavily
instrumented. The guideline that was followed is one
counter per critical section per layer.
3.1. Structure of MIB
Objects in this MIB are arranged into groups. Each group is
organized as a set of related objects. The overall structure and
assignment of objects to their groups is shown below. Where
appropriate, the corresponding management object name found in IEEE
802.1d [11] and IEEE 802.5M [14] is also included.
SR Bridge MIB Name IEEE Name
dot1dSr
PortTable
Port
HopCount SourceRoutingPort
.PortHopCount
LocalSegment .SegmentNumber
BridgeNum .BridgeNumber
TargetSegment
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 3
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
LargestFrame .LargestFrameSize
STESpanMode .LimitedBroadcastMode
SpecInFrames BridgePort
.ValidSRFramesReceived
SpecOutFrames .ValidSRForwardedOutbound
ApeInFrames
ApeOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded
SteInFrames
SteOutFrames .BroadcastFramesForwarded
SegmentMismatchDiscards .DiscardInvalidRI
DuplicateSegmentDiscards .LanIdMismatch
HopCountExceededDiscards .FramesDiscardedHopCountExceeded
The following IEEE management objects have not been included in the
SR Bridge MIB for the indicated reasons.
IEEE Object Disposition
SourceRoutingPort
The following objects were NOT
included in this MIB because they
are redundant or not considered
useful.
.LimitedBroadcastEnable
.DiscardLackOfBuffers
.DiscardErrorDetails
.DiscardTargetLANInoperable
.ValidSRDiscardedInbound
.BroadcastBytesForwarded
.NonBroadcastBytesForwarded
.FramesNotReceivedDueToCongestion
.FramesDiscardedDueToInternalError
3.1.1. The dot1dSr Group
This group contains the objects that describe the entity's state with
respect to source route bridging. If source routing is not
supported, this group will not be implemented. This group is
applicable to source route only, and SRT bridges.
3.1.2. The dot1dPortPair Group
Implementation of this group is optional. This group is implemented
by those bridges that support the port-pair multiport model of the
source route bridging mode as defined in the IEEE 802.5M SRT Addendum
to 802.1d.
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 4
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
3.2. Relationship to Other MIBs
As described above, some IEEE 802.1d management objects have not been
included in this MIB because they overlap with objects in other MIBs
applicable to a bridge implementing this MIB. In particular, it is
assumed that a bridge implementing this MIB will also implement (at
least) the Bridge MIB and the 'system' group and the 'interfaces'
group defined in MIB-II [4].
3.2.1. Relationship to the Bridge MIB
The Bridge MIB [6] must be implemented by all bridges, including
transparent, SR and SRT bridges. The SR bridge MIB is an extension
to the Bridge MIB.
3.2.2. Relationship to the 'system' group
In MIB-II, the 'system' group is defined as being mandatory for all
systems such that each managed entity contains one instance of each
object in the 'system' group. Thus, those objects apply to the
entity as a whole irrespective of whether the entity's sole
functionality is bridging, or whether bridging is only a subset of
the entity's functionality.
3.2.3. Relationship to the 'interfaces' group
In MIB-II, the 'interfaces' group is defined as being mandatory for
all systems and contains information on an entity's interfaces, where
each interface is thought of as being attached to a `subnetwork'.
(Note that this term is not to be confused with `subnet' which refers
to an addressing partitioning scheme used in the Internet suite of
protocols.) The term 'segment' is used in this memo to refer to such
a subnetwork.
Implicit in this MIB is the notion of ports on a bridge. Each of
these ports is associated with one interface of the 'interfaces'
group, and in most situations, each port is associated with a
different interface. However, there are situations in which multiple
ports are associated with the same interface. An example of such a
situation would be several ports, each corresponding one-to-one with
several X.25 virtual circuits, but all on the same interface.
Each port is uniquely identified by a port number. A port number has
no mandatory relationship to an interface number, but in the simple
case, a port number will have the same value as the corresponding
interface's interface number.
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 5
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
Some entities provide other services in addition to bridging with
respect to the data sent and received by their interfaces. In such
situations, only a subset of the data sent/received on an interface
is within the domain of the entity's bridging functionality. This
subset is considered to be delineated according to a set of
protocols, with some protocols being bridged, and other protocols not
being bridged. For example, in an entity which exclusively performed
bridging, all protocols would be considered as being bridged, whereas
in an entity which performed IP routing on IP datagrams and only
bridged other protocols, only the non-IP data would be considered as
being bridged.
Thus, this MIB (and in particular, its counters) are applicable only
to that subset of the data on an entity's interfaces which is
sent/received for a protocol being bridged. All such data is
sent/received via the ports of the bridge.
4. Changes from RFC 1286
In addition to being separated from the Bridge MIB into a separate
document, the following changes were implemented as a result of
feedback from IEEE 802.5M:
(1) Changed syntax of dot1dSrPortLargestFrame to INTEGER in
order to allow for having 64 possible values as described
in draft 7 of the SR Addendum. Listed all legal values
in description.
(2) Updated syntax of dot1dSrPort, used to index into
dot1dSrPortTable, to use the range (1..65535).
(3) Added a counter to dot1dSrPortTable to count occurrences
of duplicate LAN IDs or Tree errors.
(4) Added a counter to dot1dSrPortTable to count LAN ID
mismatches.
(5) Added text to dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames and
dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames clarifying that they are also
referred to as Source Routed Frames.
(6) Added text to dot1dSrPortApeInFrames and
dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames clarifying that they are also
referred to as All Routes Explorer frames.
(7) Added a scalar variable to the dot1dSr group to indicate
whether the bridge uses 3 bit or 6 bit length negotiation
fields.
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 6
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
(8) Added dot1dPortPairGroup to allow representation of port
pairs as defined in the IEEE 802.5M SRT Addendum.
5. Definitions
SOURCE-ROUTING-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
Counter, Gauge
FROM RFC 1155-SMI
dot1dBridge, dot1dSr
FROM BRIDGE-MIB
OBJECT-TYPE
FROM RFC 1212;
-- groups in the SR MIB
-- dot1dSr is imported from the Bridge MIB
dot1dPortPair OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { dot1dBridge 10 }
-- the dot1dSr group
-- this group is implemented by those bridges that
-- support the source route bridging mode, including Source
-- Routing and SRT bridges.
dot1dSrPortTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dSrPortEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A table that contains information about every
port that is associated with this source route
bridge."
::= { dot1dSr 1 }
dot1dSrPortEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Dot1dSrPortEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A list of information for each port of a source
route bridge."
INDEX { dot1dSrPort }
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 7
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
::= { dot1dSrPortTable 1 }
Dot1dSrPortEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
dot1dSrPort
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortHopCount
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortLocalSegment
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortBridgeNum
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortTargetSegment
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortLargestFrame
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortSTESpanMode
INTEGER,
dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames
Counter,
dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames
Counter,
dot1dSrPortApeInFrames
Counter,
dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames
Counter,
dot1dSrPortSteInFrames
Counter,
dot1dSrPortSteOutFrames
Counter,
dot1dSrPortSegmentMismatchDiscards
Counter,
dot1dSrPortDuplicateSegmentDiscards
Counter,
dot1dSrPortHopCountExceededDiscards
Counter,
dot1dSrPortDupLanIdOrTreeErrors
Counter,
dot1dSrPortLanIdMismatches
Counter
}
dot1dSrPort OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535)
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The port number of the port for which this entry
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 8
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
contains Source Route management information."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 1 }
dot1dSrPortHopCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The maximum number of routing descriptors allowed
in an All Paths or Spanning Tree Explorer frames."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 2 }
dot1dSrPortLocalSegment OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The segment number that uniquely identifies the
segment to which this port is connected. Current
source routing protocols limit this value to the
range: 0 through 4095. (The value 0 is used by
some management applications for special test
cases.) A value of 65535 signifies that no segment
number is assigned to this port."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 3 }
dot1dSrPortBridgeNum OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A bridge number uniquely identifies a bridge when
more than one bridge is used to span the same two
segments. Current source routing protocols limit
this value to the range: 0 through 15. A value of
65535 signifies that no bridge number is assigned
to this bridge."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 4 }
dot1dSrPortTargetSegment OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The segment number that corresponds to the target
segment this port is considered to be connected to
by the bridge. Current source routing protocols
limit this value to the range: 0 through 4095.
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 9
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
(The value 0 is used by some management
applications for special test cases.) A value of
65535 signifies that no target segment is assigned
to this port."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 5 }
-- It would be nice if we could use ifMtu as the size of the
-- largest frame, but we can't because ifMtu is defined to be
-- the size that the (inter-)network layer can use which can
-- differ from the MAC layer (especially if several layers of
-- encapsulation are used).
dot1dSrPortLargestFrame OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The maximum size of the INFO field (LLC and
above) that this port can send/receive. It does
not include any MAC level (framing) octets. The
value of this object is used by this bridge to
determine whether a modification of the
LargestFrame (LF, see [14]) field of the Routing
Control field of the Routing Information Field is
necessary.
64 valid values are defined by the IEEE 802.5M SRT
Addendum: 516, 635, 754, 873, 993, 1112, 1231,
1350, 1470, 1542, 1615, 1688, 1761, 1833, 1906,
1979, 2052, 2345, 2638, 2932, 3225, 3518, 3812,
4105, 4399, 4865, 5331, 5798, 6264, 6730, 7197,
7663, 8130, 8539, 8949, 9358, 9768, 10178, 10587,
10997, 11407, 12199, 12992, 13785, 14578, 15370,
16163, 16956, 17749, 20730, 23711, 26693, 29674,
32655, 35637, 38618, 41600, 44591, 47583, 50575,
53567, 56559, 59551, and 65535.
An illegal value will not be accepted by the
bridge."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 6 }
dot1dSrPortSTESpanMode OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
auto-span(1),
disabled(2),
forced(3)
}
ACCESS read-write
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 10
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Determines how this port behaves when presented
with a Spanning Tree Explorer frame. The value
'disabled(2)' indicates that the port will not
accept or send Spanning Tree Explorer packets; any
STE packets received will be silently discarded.
The value 'forced(3)' indicates the port will
always accept and propagate Spanning Tree Explorer
frames. This allows a manually configured
Spanning Tree for this class of packet to be
configured. Note that unlike transparent
bridging, this is not catastrophic to the network
if there are loops. The value 'auto-span(1)' can
only be returned by a bridge that both implements
the Spanning Tree Protocol and has use of the
protocol enabled on this port. The behavior of the
port for Spanning Tree Explorer frames is
determined by the state of dot1dStpPortState. If
the port is in the 'forwarding' state, the frame
will be accepted or propagated. Otherwise, it
will be silently discarded."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 7 }
dot1dSrPortSpecInFrames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of Specifically Routed frames, also
referred to as Source Routed Frames, that have
been received from this port's segment."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 8 }
dot1dSrPortSpecOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of Specifically Routed frames, also
referred to as Source Routed Frames, that this
port has transmitted on its segment."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 9 }
dot1dSrPortApeInFrames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 11
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
DESCRIPTION
"The number of All Paths Explorer frames, also
referred to as All Routes Explorer frames, that
have been received by this port from its segment."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 10 }
dot1dSrPortApeOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of all Paths Explorer Frames, also
referred to as All Routes Explorer frames, that
have been transmitted by this port on its
segment."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 11 }
dot1dSrPortSteInFrames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of spanning tree explorer frames that
have been received by this port from its segment."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 12 }
dot1dSrPortSteOutFrames OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of spanning tree explorer frames that
have been transmitted by this port on its
segment."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 13 }
dot1dSrPortSegmentMismatchDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of explorer frames that have been
discarded by this port because the routing
descriptor field contained an invalid adjacent
segment value."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 14 }
dot1dSrPortDuplicateSegmentDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 12
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of frames that have been discarded by
this port because the routing descriptor field
contained a duplicate segment identifier."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 15 }
dot1dSrPortHopCountExceededDiscards OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of explorer frames that have been
discarded by this port because the Routing
Information Field has exceeded the maximum route
descriptor length."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 16 }
dot1dSrPortDupLanIdOrTreeErrors OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of duplicate LAN IDs or Tree errors.
This helps in detection of problems in networks
containing older IBM Source Routing Bridges."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 17 }
dot1dSrPortLanIdMismatches OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The number of ARE and STE frames that were
discarded because the last LAN ID in the routing
information field did not equal the LAN-in ID.
This error can occur in implementations which do
only a LAN-in ID and Bridge Number check instead
of a LAN-in ID, Bridge Number, and LAN-out ID
check before they forward broadcast frames."
::= { dot1dSrPortEntry 18 }
-- scalar object in dot1dSr
dot1dSrBridgeLfMode OBJECT-TYPE
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 13
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
SYNTAX INTEGER {
mode3(1),
mode6(2)
}
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates whether the bridge operates using older
3 bit length negotiation fields or the newer 6 bit
length field in its RIF."
::= { dot1dSr 2 }
-- The Port-Pair Database
-- Implementation of this group is optional.
-- This group is implemented by those bridges that support
-- the direct multiport model of the source route bridging
-- mode as defined in the IEEE 802.5 SRT Addendum to
-- 802.1d.
-- Bridges implementing this group may report 65535 for
-- dot1dSrPortBridgeNumber and dot1dSrPortTargetSegment,
-- indicating that those objects are not applicable.
dot1dPortPairTableSize OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The total number of entries in the Bridge Port
Pair Database."
::= { dot1dPortPair 1 }
-- the Bridge Port-Pair table
-- this table represents port pairs within a bridge forming
-- a unique bridge path, as defined in the IEEE 802.5M SRT
-- Addendum.
dot1dPortPairTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF Dot1dPortPairEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A table that contains information about every
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 14
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
port pair database entity associated with this
source routing bridge."
::= { dot1dPortPair 2 }
dot1dPortPairEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Dot1dPortPairEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A list of information for each port pair entity
of a bridge."
INDEX { dot1dPortPairLowPort, dot1dPortPairHighPort }
::= { dot1dPortPairTable 1 }
Dot1dPortPairEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
dot1dPortPairLowPort
INTEGER,
dot1dPortPairHighPort
INTEGER,
dot1dPortPairBridgeNum
INTEGER,
dot1dPortPairBridgeState
INTEGER
}
dot1dPortPairLowPort OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535)
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The port number of the lower numbered port for
which this entry contains port pair database
information."
::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 1 }
dot1dPortPairHighPort OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER (1..65535)
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The port number of the higher numbered port for
which this entry contains port pair database
information."
::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 2 }
dot1dPortPairBridgeNum OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 15
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A bridge number that uniquely identifies the path
provided by this source routing bridge between the
segments connected to dot1dPortPairLowPort and
dot1dPortPairHighPort. The purpose of bridge
number is to disambiguate between multiple paths
connecting the same two LANs."
::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 3 }
dot1dPortPairBridgeState OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
enabled(1),
disabled(2),
invalid(3)
}
ACCESS read-write
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"The state of dot1dPortPairBridgeNum. Writing
'invalid(3)' to this object removes the
corresponding entry."
::= { dot1dPortPairEntry 4 }
END
6. Acknowledgments
This document was produced on behalf of the Bridge MIB Working Group
in the NM area of the Internet Engineering Task Force.
The authors wish to thank the members of the Bridge MIB Working Group
for their many comments and suggestions which improved this effort.
7. References
[1] Cerf, V., "IAB Recommendations for the Development of Internet
Network Management Standards", RFC 1052, NRI, April 1988.
[2] Cerf, V., "Report of the Second Ad Hoc Network Management Review
Group", RFC 1109, NRI, August 1989.
[3] Rose M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", STD 16, RFC
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 16
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
1155, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, May
1990.
[4] McCloghrie K., and M. Rose, Editors, "Management Information Base
for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", STD 17, RFC
1213, Performance Systems International, March 1991.
[5] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple
Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, SNMP Research,
Performance Systems International, Performance Systems
International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990.
[6] Decker, E., Langille, P., Rijsinghani, A., and McCloghrie, K.,
"Definitions of Managed Objects for Bridges", RFC 1493, cisco
Systems, Digital Equipment Corporation, Digital Equipment
Corporation, Hughes LAN Systems, July 1993.
[7] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -
Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1),
International Organization for Standardization, International
Standard 8824, December 1987.
[8] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -
Specification of Basic Encoding Rules for Abstract Notation One
(ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization,
International Standard 8825, December 1987.
[9] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, Editors, "Concise MIB Definitions",
STD 16, RFC 1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN
Systems, March 1991.
[10] Rose, M., Editor, "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with
the SNMP", RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March
1991.
[11] ANSI/IEEE Standard 802.1D-1990 MAC Bridges, IEEE Project 802
Local and Metropolitan Area Networks, (March 8, 1991).
[12] I.B.M. Token Ring Architecture Reference.
[13] ISO DIS 10038 MAC Bridges.
[14] ANSI/IEEE P802.5M-Draft 7, "Source Routing Transparent Bridge
Operation", IEEE Project 802 (1991).
[15] ANSI/IEEE 802.1y, "Source Routing Tutorial for End System
Operation", (September, 1990).
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 17
RFC 1525 Source Routing Bridge MIB September 1993
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Authors' Addresses
Eric B. Decker
cisco Systems, Inc.
1525 O'Brien Dr.
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Phone: (415) 326-1941
Email: cire@cisco.com
Keith McCloghrie
Hughes LAN Systems, Inc.
1225 Charleston Road
Mountain View, CA 94043
Phone: (415) 966-7934
EMail: kzm@hls.com
Paul Langille
Digital Equipment Corporation
Digital Drive, MK02-2/K03
Merrimack, NH 03054
Phone: (603) 884-4045
EMail: langille@edwin.enet.dec.com
Anil Rijsinghani
Digital Equipment Corporation
550 King Street
Littleton, MA 01460
Phone: (508) 486-6786
EMail: anil@levers.enet.dec.com
Decker, McCloghrie, Langille & Rijsinghani PAGE 18
Definitions of Managed Objects for Source Routing Bridges
RFC TOTAL SIZE: 38100 bytes
PUBLICATION DATE: Wednesday, September 29th, 1993
LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)
|
