|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 132
Typographical Error in RFC 107 Last modified on Thursday, May 1st, 1997 Permanent link to RFC 132 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 132 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 132 NETWORK WORKING GROUP Jim White Request for Comments #132 UCSB NIC #6708 April 28, 1971 TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN RFC 107 ______________________________ On page 5 of RFC 107, at the end of the section titled 'V. Flow Control', the partial sentence: Each of these numbers is interpreted as "the number of 128ths of the current allocation" to be returned if it is in the range zero to 128... should read: ...if it is the range of zero to 127,... --- That is, return al the appropriate allocation if and only if the high-order of the left-most bit of the corresponding fraction is 1. [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Mohnish Harisinganey 5/97 ] PAGE 1 |