|
RFC Home |
Full RFC Index |
Recent RFCs |
RFC Standards |
Best Current Practice |
RFC Errata |
1 April RFC |
|
||||||
|
IETF RFC 1078
TCP port service Multiplexer (TCPMUX) Last modified on Wednesday, November 23rd, 1988 Permanent link to RFC 1078 Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 1078 Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 1078 Network Working Group M. Lottor Request For Comments: 1078 SRI-NIC November 1988 TCP Port Service Multiplexer (TCPMUX) Status of this Memo This RFC proposes an Internet standard which can be used by future TCP services instead of using 'well-known ports'. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Overview Ports are used in the TCP to name the ends of logical connections which carry long term conversations. For the purpose of providing services to unknown callers, a service contact port is defined. The contact port is sometimes called the "well-known port". Standard TCP services are assigned unique well-known port numbers in the range of 0-255. These ports are of limited number and are typically only assigned to official Internet protocols. This RFC defines a protocol to contact multiple services on a single well-known TCP port using a service name instead of a well-known number. In addition, private protocols can make use of the service without needing an official TCP port assignment. The Protocol A TCP client connects to a foreign host on TCP port 1. It sends the service name followed by a carriage-return line-feed <CRLF>. The service name is never case sensitive. The server replies with a single character indicating positive ("+") or negative ("-") acknowledgment, immediately followed by an optional message of explanation, terminated with a <CRLF>. If the reply was positive, the selected protocol begins; otherwise the connection is closed. Service Names The name "HELP" is reserved. If received, the server will output a multi-line message and then close the connection. The reply to the name "HELP" must be a list of the service names of the supported services, one name per line. The names listed in the "Protocol and Service Names" section of the current edition of "Assigned Numbers" (RFC 1010 at this time) are reserved to have exactly the definitions specified there. Services Lottor PAGE 1 |