The RFC Archive
 The RFC Archive   RFC 8303   « Jump to any RFC number directly 
 RFC Home
Full RFC Index
Recent RFCs
RFC Standards
Best Current Practice
RFC Errata
1 April RFC



IETF RFC 8303



Last modified on Thursday, February 8th, 2018

Permanent link to RFC 8303
Search GitHub Wiki for RFC 8303
Show other RFCs mentioning RFC 8303







Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                          M. Welzl
Request for Comments: 8303                            University of Oslo
Category: Informational                                      M. Tuexen
ISSN: 2070-1721                         Muenster Univ. of Appl. Sciences
                                                              N. Khademi
                                                      University of Oslo
                                                           February 2018


                   On the Usage of Transport Features
                  Provided by IETF Transport Protocols

 Abstract

   This document describes how the transport protocols Transmission
   Control Protocol (TCP), MultiPath TCP (MPTCP), Stream Control
   Transmission Protocol (SCTP), User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and
   Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite) expose services to
   applications and how an application can configure and use the
   features that make up these services.  It also discusses the service
   provided by the Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT)
   congestion control mechanism.  The description results in a set of
   transport abstractions that can be exported in a transport services
   (TAPS) API.

 Status of This Memo

   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for informational purposes.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Not all documents
   approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet
   Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8303.











Welzl, et al.                 Informational                  PAGE 1 top


RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 2. Terminology .....................................................5 3. Pass 1 ..........................................................6 3.1. Primitives Provided by TCP .................................6 3.1.1. Excluded Primitives or Parameters ...................9 3.2. Primitives Provided by MPTCP ..............................10 3.3. Primitives Provided by SCTP ...............................11 3.3.1. Excluded Primitives or Parameters ..................18 3.4. Primitives Provided by UDP and UDP-Lite ...................18 3.5. The Service of LEDBAT .....................................19 4. Pass 2 .........................................................20 4.1. CONNECTION-Related Primitives .............................21 4.2. DATA-Transfer-Related Primitives ..........................38 5. Pass 3 .........................................................41 5.1. CONNECTION-Related Transport Features .....................41 5.2. DATA-Transfer-Related Transport Features ..................47 5.2.1. Sending Data .......................................47 5.2.2. Receiving Data .....................................48 5.2.3. Errors .............................................49 6. IANA Considerations ............................................49 7. Security Considerations ........................................49 8. References .....................................................50 8.1. Normative References ......................................50 8.2. Informative References ....................................52 Appendix A. Overview of RFCs Used as Input for Pass 1 .............54 Appendix B. How This Document Was Developed .......................54 Acknowledgements ..................................................56 Authors' Addresses ................................................56 Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 2 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 1. Introduction This specification describes how transport protocols offer transport services, such that applications using them are no longer directly tied to a specific protocol. Breaking this strict connection can reduce the effort for an application programmer, yet attain greater transport flexibility by pushing complexity into an underlying transport services (TAPS) system. This design process has started with a survey of the services provided by IETF transport protocols and congestion control mechanisms [RFC 8095]. The present document and [RFC 8304] complement this survey with an in-depth look at the defined interactions between applications and the following unicast transport protocols: Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), MultiPath TCP (MPTCP), Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and Lightweight User Datagram Protocol (UDP-Lite). We also define a primitive to enable/disable and configure the Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT) unicast congestion control mechanism. For UDP and UDP-Lite, the first step of the protocol analysis -- a discussion of relevant RFC text -- is documented in [RFC 8304]. This snapshot in time of the IETF transport protocols is published as an RFC to document the analysis by the authors and the TAPS Working Group; this generates a set of transport abstractions that can be exported in a TAPS API. It provides the basis for the minimal set of transport services that end systems supporting TAPS should implement [TAPS-MINSET]. The list of primitives, events, and transport features in this document is strictly based on the parts of protocol specifications that describe what the protocol provides to an application using it and how the application interacts with it. Transport protocols provide communication between processes that operate on network endpoints, which means that they allow for multiplexing of communication between the same IP addresses, and this multiplexing is achieved using port numbers. Port multiplexing is therefore assumed to be always provided and not discussed in this document. Parts of a protocol that are explicitly stated as optional to implement are not covered. Interactions between the application and a transport protocol that are not directly related to the operation of the protocol are also not covered. For example, there are various ways for an application to use socket options to indicate its interest in receiving certain notifications [RFC 6458]. However, for the purpose of identifying primitives, events, and transport features, the ability to enable or disable the reception of notifications is irrelevant. Similarly, "one-to-many style sockets" Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 3 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 [RFC 6458] just affect the application programming style, not how the underlying protocol operates, and they are therefore not discussed here. The same is true for the ability to obtain the unchanged value of a parameter that an application has previously set (e.g., via "get" in get/set operations [RFC 6458]). The document presents a three-pass process to arrive at a list of transport features. In the first pass (pass 1), the relevant RFC text is discussed per protocol. In the second pass (pass 2), this discussion is used to derive a list of primitives and events that are uniformly categorized across protocols. Here, an attempt is made to present or -- where text describing primitives or events does not yet exist -- construct primitives or events in a slightly generalized form to highlight similarities. This is, for example, achieved by renaming primitives or events of protocols or by avoiding a strict 1:1 mapping between the primitives or events in the protocol specification and primitives or events in the list. Finally, the third pass (pass 3) presents transport features based on pass 2, identifying which protocols implement them. In the list resulting from the second pass, some transport features are missing because they are implicit in some protocols, and they only become explicit when we consider the superset of all transport features offered by all protocols. For example, TCP always carries out congestion control; we have to consider it together with a protocol like UDP (which does not have congestion control) before we can consider congestion control as a transport feature. The complete list of transport features across all protocols is therefore only available after pass 3. Some protocols are connection oriented. Connection-oriented protocols often use an initial call to a specific primitive to open a connection before communication can progress and require communication to be explicitly terminated by issuing another call to a primitive (usually called 'Close'). A "connection" is the common state that some transport primitives refer to, e.g., to adjust general configuration settings. Connection establishment, maintenance, and termination are therefore used to categorize transport primitives of connection-oriented transport protocols in pass 2 and pass 3. For this purpose, UDP is assumed to be used with "connected" sockets, i.e., sockets that are bound to a specific pair of addresses and ports [RFC 8304]. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 4 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 2. Terminology Transport Feature: a specific end-to-end feature that the transport layer provides to an application. Examples include confidentiality, reliable delivery, ordered delivery, message- versus-stream orientation, etc. Transport Service: a set of transport features, without an association to any given framing protocol, which provides a complete service to an application. Transport Protocol: an implementation that provides one or more transport services using a specific framing and header format on the wire. Transport Protocol Component: an implementation of a transport feature within a protocol. Transport Service Instance: an arrangement of transport protocols with a selected set of features and configuration parameters that implement a single transport service, e.g., a protocol stack (RTP over UDP). Application: an entity that uses the transport layer for end-to-end delivery of data across the network (this may also be an upper- layer protocol or tunnel encapsulation). Endpoint: an entity that communicates with one or more other endpoints using a transport protocol. Connection: shared state of two or more endpoints that persists across messages that are transmitted between these endpoints. Primitive: a function call that is used to locally communicate between an application and a transport endpoint. A primitive is related to one or more transport features. Event: a primitive that is invoked by a transport endpoint. Parameter: a value passed between an application and a transport protocol by a primitive. Socket: the combination of a destination IP address and a destination port number. Transport Address: the combination of an IP address, transport protocol, and the port number used by the transport protocol. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 5 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 3. Pass 1 This first iteration summarizes the relevant text parts of the RFCs describing the protocols, focusing on what each transport protocol provides to the application and how it is used (abstract API descriptions, where they are available). When presenting primitives, events, and parameters, the use of lower- and upper-case characters is made uniform for the sake of readability. 3.1. Primitives Provided by TCP The initial TCP specification [RFC 793] states: The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is intended for use as a highly reliable host-to-host protocol between hosts in packet- switched computer communication networks, and in interconnected systems of such networks. Section 3.8 of [RFC 793] further specifies the interaction with the application by listing several transport primitives. It is also assumed that an Operating System provides a means for TCP to asynchronously signal the application; the primitives representing such signals are called 'events' in this section. This section describes the relevant primitives. Open: This is either active or passive, to initiate a connection or listen for incoming connections. All other primitives are associated with a specific connection, which is assumed to first have been opened. An active open call contains a socket. A passive open call with a socket waits for a particular connection; alternatively, a passive open call can leave the socket unspecified to accept any incoming connection. A fully specified passive call can later be made active by calling 'Send'. Optionally, a timeout can be specified, after which TCP will abort the connection if data has not been successfully delivered to the destination (else a default timeout value is used). A procedure for aborting the connection is used to avoid excessive retransmissions, and an application is able to control the threshold used to determine the condition for aborting; this threshold may be measured in time units or as a count of retransmission [RFC 1122]. This indicates that the timeout could also be specified as a count of retransmission. Also optional, for multihomed hosts, the local IP address can be provided [RFC 1122]. If it is not provided, a default choice will be made in case of active open calls. A passive open call will await incoming connection requests to all local addresses and then maintain usage of the local IP address where the incoming Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 6 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 connection request has arrived. Finally, the 'options' parameter allows the application to specify IP options such as Source Route, Record Route, or Timestamp [RFC 1122]. It is not stated on which segments of a connection these options should be applied, but probably on all segments, as this is also stated in a specification given for the usage of the Source Route IP option (Section 4.2.3.8 of [RFC 1122]). Source Route is the only non- optional IP option in this parameter, allowing an application to specify a source route when it actively opens a TCP connection. Master Key Tuples (MKTs) for authentication can optionally be configured when calling 'Open' (Section 7.1 of [RFC 5925]). When authentication is in use, complete TCP segments are authenticated, including the TCP IPv4 pseudoheader, TCP header, and TCP data. TCP Fast Open (TFO) [RFC 7413] allows applications to immediately hand over a message from the active open to the passive open side of a TCP connection together with the first message establishment packet (the SYN). This can be useful for applications that are sensitive to TCP's connection setup delay. [RFC 7413] states that "TCP implementations MUST NOT use TFO by default, but only use TFO if requested explicitly by the application on a per-service-port basis." The size of the message sent with TFO cannot be more than TCP's maximum segment size (minus options used in the SYN). For the active open side, it is recommended to change or replace the connect() call in order to support a user data buffer argument [RFC 7413]. For the passive open side, the application needs to enable the reception of Fast Open requests, e.g., via a new TCP_FASTOPEN setsockopt() socket option before listen(). The receiving application must be prepared to accept duplicates of the TFO message, as the first data written to a socket can be delivered more than once to the application on the remote host. Send: This is the primitive that an application uses to give the local TCP transport endpoint a number of bytes that TCP should reliably send to the other side of the connection. The 'urgent' flag, if set, states that the data handed over by this send call is urgent and this urgency should be indicated to the receiving process in case the receiving application has not yet consumed all non-urgent data preceding it. An optional timeout parameter can be provided that updates the connection's timeout (see 'Open'). Additionally, optional parameters allow the ability to indicate the preferred outgoing MKT (current_key) and/or the preferred incoming MKT (rnext_key) of a connection (Section 7.1 of [RFC 5925]). Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 7 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Receive: This primitive allocates a receiving buffer for a provided number of bytes. It returns the number of received bytes provided in the buffer when these bytes have been received and written into the buffer by TCP. The application is informed of urgent data via an 'urgent' flag: if it is on, there is urgent data; if it is off, there is no urgent data or this call to 'Receive' has returned all the urgent data. The application is also informed about the current_key and rnext_key information carried in a recently received segment via an optional parameter (Section 7.1 of [RFC 5925]). Close: This primitive closes one side of a connection. It is semantically equivalent to "I have no more data to send" but does not mean "I will not receive any more", as the other side may still have data to send. This call reliably delivers any data that has already been given to TCP (and if that fails, 'Close' becomes 'abort'). Abort: This primitive causes all pending 'Send' and 'Receive' calls to be aborted. A TCP "RESET" message is sent to the TCP endpoint on the other side of the connection [RFC 793]. Close Event: TCP uses this primitive to inform an application that the application on the other side has called the 'Close' primitive, so the local application can also issue a 'Close' and terminate the connection gracefully. See [RFC 793], Section 3.5. Abort Event: When TCP aborts a connection upon receiving a "RESET" from the peer, it "advises the user and goes to the CLOSED state." See [RFC 793], Section 3.4. User Timeout Event: This event is executed when the user timeout (Section 3.9 of [RFC 793]) expires (see the definition of 'Open' in this section). All queues are flushed, and the application is informed that the connection had to be aborted due to user timeout. Error_Report event: This event informs the application of "soft errors" that can be safely ignored [RFC 5461], including the arrival of an ICMP error message or excessive retransmissions (reaching a threshold below the threshold where the connection is aborted). See Section 4.2.4.1 of [RFC 1122]. Type-of-Service: Section 4.2.4.2 of the requirements for Internet hosts [RFC 1122] states that "The application layer MUST be able to specify the Type-of-Service (TOS) for segments that are sent on a connection." The application should be able to change the TOS during the connection lifetime, and the TOS value should be passed Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 8 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 to the IP layer unchanged. Since then, the TOS field has been redefined. The Differentiated Services (Diffserv) model [RFC 2475] [RFC 3260] replaces this field in the IP header, assigning the six most significant bits to carry the Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) field [RFC 2474]. Nagle: The Nagle algorithm delays sending data for some time to increase the likelihood of sending a full-sized segment (Section 4.2.3.4 of [RFC 1122]). An application can disable the Nagle algorithm for an individual connection. User Timeout Option: The User Timeout Option (UTO) [RFC 5482] allows one end of a TCP connection to advertise its current user timeout value so that the other end of the TCP connection can adapt its own user timeout accordingly. In addition to the configurable value of the user timeout (see 'Send'), there are three per- connection state variables that an application can adjust to control the operation of the UTO: 'adv_uto' is the value of the UTO advertised to the remote TCP peer (default: system-wide default user timeout); 'enabled' (default false) is a boolean-type flag that controls whether the UTO option is enabled for a connection. This applies to both sending and receiving. 'changeable' is a boolean-type flag (default true) that controls whether the user timeout may be changed based on a UTO option received from the other end of the connection. 'changeable' becomes false when an application explicitly sets the user timeout (see 'Send'). Set/Get Authentication Parameters: The preferred outgoing MKT (current_key) and/or the preferred incoming MKT (rnext_key) of a connection can be configured. Information about current_key and rnext_key carried in a recently received segment can be retrieved (Section 7.1 of [RFC 5925]). 3.1.1. Excluded Primitives or Parameters The 'Open' primitive can be handed optional precedence or security/ compartment information [RFC 793], but this was not included here because it is mostly irrelevant today [RFC 7414]. The 'Status' primitive was not included because the initial TCP specification describes this primitive as "implementation dependent" and states that it "could be excluded without adverse effect" [RFC 793]. Moreover, while a data block containing specific information is described, it is also stated that not all of this information may always be available. While [RFC 5925] states that 'Status' "SHOULD be augmented to allow the MKTs of a current or pending connection to be read (for confirmation)", the same Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 9 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 information is also available via 'Receive', which, following [RFC 5925], "MUST be augmented" with that functionality. The 'Send' primitive includes an optional 'push' flag which, if set, requires data to be promptly transmitted to the receiver without delay [RFC 793]; the 'Receive' primitive described in can (under some conditions) yield the status of the 'push' flag. Because "push" functionality is optional to implement for both the 'Send' and 'Receive' primitives [RFC 1122], this functionality is not included here. The requirements for Internet hosts [RFC 1122] also introduce keep-alives to TCP, but these are optional to implement and hence not considered here. The same document also describes that "some TCP implementations have included a FLUSH call", indicating that this call is also optional to implement; therefore, it is not considered here. 3.2. Primitives Provided by MPTCP MPTCP is an extension to TCP that allows the use of multiple paths for a single data stream. It achieves this by creating different so- called TCP subflows for each of the interfaces and scheduling the traffic across these TCP subflows. The service provided by MPTCP is described as follows in [RFC 6182]: Multipath TCP MUST follow the same service model as TCP [RFC 793]: in-order, reliable, and byte-oriented delivery. Furthermore, a Multipath TCP connection SHOULD provide the application with no worse throughput or resilience than it would expect from running a single TCP connection over any one of its available paths. Further, there are some constraints on the API exposed by MPTCP, as stated in [RFC 6182]: A multipath-capable equivalent of TCP MUST retain some level of backward compatibility with existing TCP APIs, so that existing applications can use the newer transport merely by upgrading the operating systems of the end hosts. As such, the primitives provided by MPTCP are equivalent to the ones provided by TCP. Nevertheless, the MPTCP RFCs [RFC 6824] and [RFC 6897] clarify some parts of TCP's primitives with respect to MPTCP and add some extensions for better control on MPTCP's subflows. Hereafter is a list of the clarifications and extensions the above- cited RFCs provide to TCP's primitives. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 10 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Open: "An application should be able to request to turn on or turn off the usage of MPTCP" [RFC 6897]. This functionality can be provided through a socket option called 'tcp_multipath_enable'. Further, MPTCP must be disabled in case the application is binding to a specific address [RFC 6897]. Send/Receive: The sending and receiving of data does not require any changes to the application when MPTCP is being used [RFC 6824]. The MPTCP-layer will take one input data stream from an application, and split it into one or more subflows, with sufficient control information to allow it to be reassembled and delivered reliably and in order to the recipient application. The use of the Urgent Pointer is special in MPTCP [RFC 6824], which states: "a TCP subflow MUST NOT use the Urgent Pointer to interrupt an existing mapping." Address and Subflow Management: MPTCP uses different addresses and allows a host to announce these addresses as part of the protocol. The MPTCP API Considerations RFC [RFC 6897] says "An application should be able to restrict MPTCP to binding to a given set of addresses" and thus allows applications to limit the set of addresses that are being used by MPTCP. Further, "An application should be able to obtain information on the pairs of addresses used by the MPTCP subflows." 3.3. Primitives Provided by SCTP TCP has a number of limitations that SCTP removes (Section 1.1 of [RFC 4960]). The following three removed limitations directly translate into transport features that are visible to an application using SCTP: 1) it allows for preservation of message delimiters; 2) it does not provide in-order or reliable delivery unless the application wants that; 3) multihoming is supported. In SCTP, connections are called "associations" and they can be between not only two (as in TCP) but multiple addresses at each endpoint. Section 10 of the SCTP base protocol specification [RFC 4960] specifies the interaction with the application (which SCTP calls the "Upper-Layer Protocol (ULP)"). It is assumed that the Operating System provides a means for SCTP to asynchronously signal the application; the primitives representing such signals are called 'events' in this section. Here, we describe the relevant primitives. In addition to the abstract API described in Section 10 of [RFC 4960], an extension to the sockets API is described in [RFC 6458]. This covers the functionality of the base protocol [RFC 4960] and some of its extensions [RFC 3758] [RFC 4895] [RFC 5061]. For other protocol extensions [RFC 6525] [RFC 6951] [RFC 7053] [RFC 7496] [RFC 7829] Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 11 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 [RFC 8260], the corresponding extensions of the sockets API are specified in these protocol specifications. The functionality exposed to the ULP through all these APIs is considered here. The abstract API contains a 'SetProtocolParameters' primitive that allows elements of a parameter list [RFC 4960] to be adjusted; it is stated that SCTP implementations "may allow ULP to customize some of these protocol parameters", indicating that none of the elements of this parameter list are mandatory to make ULP configurable. Thus, we only consider the parameters in the abstract API that are also covered in one of the other RFCs listed above, which leads us to exclude the parameters 'RTO.Alpha', 'RTO.Beta', and 'HB.Max.Burst'. For clarity, we also replace 'SetProtocolParameters' itself with primitives that adjust parameters or groups of parameters that fit together. Initialize: Initialize creates a local SCTP instance that it binds to a set of local addresses (and, if provided, a local port number) [RFC 4960]. Initialize needs to be called only once per set of local addresses. A number of per-association initialization parameters can be used when an association is created, but before it is connected (via the primitive 'Associate' below): the maximum number of inbound streams the application is prepared to support, the maximum number of attempts to be made when sending the INIT (the first message of association establishment), and the maximum retransmission timeout (RTO) value to use when attempting an INIT [RFC 6458]. At this point, before connecting, an application can also enable UDP encapsulation by configuring the remote UDP encapsulation port number [RFC 6951]. Associate: This creates an association (the SCTP equivalent of a connection) that connects the local SCTP instance and a remote SCTP instance. To identify the remote endpoint, it can be given one or multiple (using "connectx") sockets (Section 9.9 of [RFC 6458]). Most primitives are associated with a specific association, which is assumed to first have been created. Associate can return a list of destination transport addresses so that multiple paths can later be used. One of the returned sockets will be selected by the local endpoint as the default primary path for sending SCTP packets to this peer, but this choice can be changed by the application using the list of destination addresses. Associate is also given the number of outgoing streams to request and optionally returns the number of negotiated outgoing streams. An optional parameter of 32 bits, the adaptation layer indication, can be provided [RFC 5061]. If authenticated chunks are used, the chunk types required to be sent authenticated by the peer can be provided [RFC 4895]. An 'SCTP_Cant_Str_Assoc' notification is used to inform the Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 12 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 application of a failure to create an association [RFC 6458]. An application could use sendto() or sendmsg() to implicitly set up an association, thereby handing over a message that SCTP might send during the association setup phase [RFC 6458]. Note that this mechanism is different from TCP's TFO mechanism: the message would arrive only once, after at least one RTT, as it is sent together with the third message exchanged during association setup, the COOKIE-ECHO chunk). Send: This sends a message of a certain length in bytes over an association. A number can be provided to later refer to the correct message when reporting an error, and a stream id is provided to specify the stream to be used inside an association (we consider this as a mandatory parameter here for simplicity: if not provided, the stream id defaults to 0). A condition to abandon the message can be specified (for example limiting the number of retransmissions or the lifetime of the user message). This allows control of the partial reliability extension [RFC 3758] [RFC 7496]. An optional maximum lifetime can specify the time after which the message should be discarded rather than sent. A choice (advisory, i.e., not guaranteed) of the preferred path can be made by providing a socket, and the message can be delivered out-of-order if the 'unordered' flag is set. An advisory flag indicates that the peer should not delay the acknowledgement of the user message provided [RFC 7053]. Another advisory flag indicates whether the application prefers to avoid bundling user data with other outbound DATA chunks (i.e., in the same packet). A payload protocol-id can be provided to pass a value that indicates the type of payload protocol data to the peer. If authenticated chunks are used, the key identifier for authenticating DATA chunks can be provided [RFC 4895]. Receive: Messages are received from an association, and optionally a stream within the association, with their size returned. The application is notified of the availability of data via a 'Data Arrive' notification. If the sender has included a payload protocol-id, this value is also returned. If the received message is only a partial delivery of a whole message, a 'partial' flag will indicate so, in which case the stream id and a stream sequence number are provided to the application. Shutdown: This primitive gracefully closes an association, reliably delivering any data that has already been handed over to SCTP. A parameter lets the application control whether further receive or send operations or both are disabled when the call is issued. A return code informs about success or failure of this procedure. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 13 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Abort: This ungracefully closes an association, by discarding any locally queued data and informing the peer that the association was aborted. Optionally, an abort reason to be passed to the peer may be provided by the application. A return code informs about success or failure of this procedure. Change Heartbeat / Request Heartbeat: This allows the application to enable/disable heartbeats and optionally specify a heartbeat frequency as well as requesting a single heartbeat to be carried out upon a function call, with a notification about success or failure of transmitting the HEARTBEAT chunk to the destination. Configure Max. Retransmissions of an Association: The parameter 'Association.Max.Retrans' [RFC 4960] (called "sasoc_maxrxt" in the SCTP sockets API extensions [RFC 6458]) allows the configuration of the number of unsuccessful retransmissions after which an entire association is considered as failed; this should invoke a 'Communication Lost' notification. Set Primary: This allows the ability to set a new primary default path for an association by providing a socket. Optionally, a default source address to be used in IP datagrams can be provided. Change Local Address / Set Peer Primary: This allows an endpoint to add/remove local addresses to/from an association. In addition, the peer can be given a hint for which address to use as the primary address [RFC 5061]. Configure Path Switchover: The abstract API contains a primitive called 'Set Failure Threshold' [RFC 4960]. This configures the parameter 'Path.Max.Retrans', which determines after how many retransmissions a particular transport address is considered as unreachable. If there are more transport addresses available in an association, reaching this limit will invoke a path switchover. An extension called "SCTP-PF" adds a concept of "Potentially Failed (PF)" paths to this method [RFC 7829]. When a path is in PF state, SCTP will not entirely give up sending on that path, but it will preferably send data on other active paths if such paths are available. Entering the PF state is done upon exceeding a configured maximum number of retransmissions. Thus, for all paths where this mechanism is used, there are two configurable error thresholds: one to decide that a path is in PF state, and one to decide that the transport address is unreachable. Set/Get Authentication Parameters: This allows an endpoint to add/ remove key material to/from an association. In addition, the chunk types being authenticated can be queried [RFC 4895]. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 14 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Add/Reset Streams, Reset Association: This allows an endpoint to add streams to an existing association or to reset them individually. Additionally, the association can be reset [RFC 6525]. Status: The 'Status' primitive returns a data block with information about a specified association, containing: an association connection state; a destination transport address list; destination transport address reachability states; current local and peer receiver window sizes; current local congestion window sizes; number of unacknowledged DATA chunks; number of DATA chunks pending receipt; a primary path; the most recent Smoothed Round- Trip Time (SRTT) on a primary path; RTO on a primary path; SRTT and RTO on other destination addresses [RFC 4960]; and an MTU per path [RFC 6458]. Enable/Disable Interleaving: This allows the negotiation of user message interleaving support for future associations to be enabled or disabled. For existing associations, it is possible to query whether user message interleaving support was negotiated or not on a particular association [RFC 8260]. Set Stream Scheduler: This allows the ability to select a stream scheduler per association, with a choice of: First-Come, First- Served; Round-Robin; Round-Robin per Packet; Priority-Based; Fair Bandwidth; and Weighted Fair Queuing [RFC 8260]. Configure Stream Scheduler: This allows the ability to change a parameter per stream for the schedulers: a priority value for the Priority-Based scheduler and a weight for the Weighted Fair Queuing scheduler. Enable/Disable NoDelay: This turns on/off any Nagle-like algorithm for an association [RFC 6458]. Configure Send Buffer Size: This controls the amount of data SCTP may have waiting in internal buffers to be sent or retransmitted [RFC 6458]. Configure Receive Buffer Size: This sets the receive buffer size in octets, thereby controlling the receiver window for an association [RFC 6458]. Configure Message Fragmentation: If a user message causes an SCTP packet to exceed the maximum fragmentation size (which can be provided by the application and is otherwise the Path MTU (PMTU) size), then the message will be fragmented by SCTP. Disabling message fragmentation will produce an error instead of fragmenting the message [RFC 6458]. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 15 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Configure Path MTU Discovery: Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) can be enabled or disabled per peer address of an association (Section 8.1.12 of [RFC 6458]). When it is enabled, the current Path MTU value can be obtained. When it is disabled, the Path MTU to be used can be controlled by the application. Configure Delayed SACK Timer: The time before sending a SACK can be adjusted; delaying SACKs can be disabled; and the number of packets that must be received before a SACK is sent without waiting for the delay timer to expire can be configured [RFC 6458]. Set Cookie Life Value: The cookie life value can be adjusted (Section 8.1.2 of [RFC 6458]). 'Valid.Cookie.Life' is also one of the parameters that is potentially adjustable with 'SetProtocolParameters' [RFC 4960]. Set Maximum Burst: The maximum burst of packets that can be emitted by a particular association (default 4, and values above 4 are optional to implement) can be adjusted (Section 8.1.2 of [RFC 6458]). 'Max.Burst' is also one of the parameters that is potentially adjustable with 'SetProtocolParameters' [RFC 4960]. Configure RTO Calculation: The abstract API contains the following adjustable parameters: 'RTO.Initial'; 'RTO.Min'; 'RTO.Max'; 'RTO.Alpha'; and 'RTO.Beta'. Only the initial, minimum and maximum RTOs are also described as configurable in the SCTP sockets API extensions [RFC 6458]. Set DSCP Value: The DSCP value can be set per peer address of an association (Section 8.1.12 of [RFC 6458]). Set IPv6 Flow Label: The flow label field can be set per peer address of an association (Section 8.1.12 of [RFC 6458]). Set Partial Delivery Point: This allows the ability to specify the size of a message where partial delivery will be invoked. Setting this to a lower value will cause partial deliveries to happen more often [RFC 6458]. Communication Up Notification: When a lost communication to an endpoint is restored or when SCTP becomes ready to send or receive user messages, this notification informs the application process about the affected association, the type of event that has occurred, the complete set of sockets of the peer, the maximum number of allowed streams, and the inbound stream count (the number of streams the peer endpoint has requested). If interleaving is supported by both endpoints, this information is also included in this notification. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 16 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Restart Notification: When SCTP has detected that the peer has restarted, this notification is passed to the upper layer [RFC 6458]. Data Arrive Notification: When a message is ready to be retrieved via the 'Receive' primitive, the application is informed by this notification. Send Failure Notification / Receive Unsent Message / Receive Unacknowledged Message: When a message cannot be delivered via an association, the sender can be informed about it and learn whether the message has just not been acknowledged or (e.g., in case of lifetime expiry) if it has not even been sent. This can also inform the sender that a part of the message has been successfully delivered. Network Status Change Notification: This informs the application about a socket becoming active/inactive [RFC 4960] or "Potentially Failed" [RFC 7829]. Communication Lost Notification: When SCTP loses communication to an endpoint (e.g., via heartbeats or excessive retransmission) or detects an abort, this notification informs the application process of the affected association and the type of event (failure OR termination in response to a shutdown or abort request). Shutdown Complete Notification: When SCTP completes the shutdown procedures, this notification is passed to the upper layer, informing it about the affected association. Authentication Notification: When SCTP wants to notify the upper layer regarding the key management related to authenticated chunks [RFC 4895], this notification is passed to the upper layer. Adaptation Layer Indication Notification: When SCTP completes the association setup and the peer provided an adaptation layer indication, this is passed to the upper layer [RFC 5061] [RFC 6458]. Stream Reset Notification: When SCTP completes the procedure for resetting streams [RFC 6525], this notification is passed to the upper layer, informing it about the result. Association Reset Notification: When SCTP completes the association reset procedure [RFC 6525], this notification is passed to the upper layer, informing it about the result. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 17 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Stream Change Notification: When SCTP completes the procedure used to increase the number of streams [RFC 6525], this notification is passed to the upper layer, informing it about the result. Sender Dry Notification: When SCTP has no more user data to send or retransmit on a particular association, this notification is passed to the upper layer [RFC 6458]. Partial Delivery Aborted Notification: When a receiver has begun to receive parts of a user message but the delivery of this message is then aborted, this notification is passed to the upper layer (Section 6.1.7 of [RFC 6458]). 3.3.1. Excluded Primitives or Parameters The 'Receive' primitive can return certain additional information, but this is optional to implement and therefore not considered. With a 'Communication Lost' notification, some more information may optionally be passed to the application (e.g., identification to retrieve unsent and unacknowledged data). SCTP "can invoke" a 'Communication Error' notification and "may send" a 'Restart' notification, making these two notifications optional to implement. The list provided under 'Status' includes "etc.", indicating that more information could be provided. The primitive 'Get SRTT Report' returns information that is included in the information that 'Status' provides and is therefore not discussed. The 'Destroy SCTP Instance' API function was excluded: it erases the SCTP instance that was created by 'Initialize' but is not a primitive as defined in this document because it does not relate to a transport feature. The 'Shutdown' event informs an application that the peer has sent a SHUTDOWN, and hence no further data should be sent on this socket (Section 6.1 of [RFC 6458]). However, if an application would try to send data on the socket, it would get an error message anyway; thus, this event is classified as "just affecting the application programming style, not how the underlying protocol operates" and is not included here. 3.4. Primitives Provided by UDP and UDP-Lite The set of pass 1 primitives for UDP and UDP-Lite is documented in [RFC 8304]. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 18 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 3.5. The Service of LEDBAT The service of the LEDBAT congestion control mechanism is described as follows: LEDBAT is designed for use by background bulk-transfer applications to be no more aggressive than standard TCP congestion control (as specified in RFC 5681) and to yield in the presence of competing flows, thus limiting interference with the network performance of competing flows [RFC 6817]. LEDBAT does not have any primitives, as LEDBAT is not a transport protocol. According to its specification [RFC 6817]: LEDBAT can be used as part of a transport protocol or as part of an application, as long as the data transmission mechanisms are capable of carrying timestamps and acknowledging data frequently. LEDBAT can be used with TCP, Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), and Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP), with appropriate extensions where necessary; and it can be used with proprietary application protocols, such as those built on top of UDP for peer-to-peer (P2P) applications. At the time of writing, the appropriate extensions for TCP, SCTP, or DCCP do not exist. A number of configurable parameters exist in the LEDBAT specification: TARGET, which is the queuing delay target at which LEDBAT tries to operate, must be set to 100 ms or less. 'allowed_increase' (should be 1, must be greater than 0) limits the speed at which LEDBAT increases its rate. 'gain', which according to [RFC 6817] "MUST be set to 1 or less" to avoid a faster ramp-up than TCP Reno, determines how quickly the sender responds to changes in queueing delay. Implementations may divide 'gain' into two parameters: one for increase and a possibly larger one for decrease. We call these parameters 'Gain_Inc' and 'Gain_Dec' here. 'Base_History' is the size of the list of measured base delays, and, according to [RFC 6817], "SHOULD be 10". This list can be filtered using a 'Filter' function, which is not prescribed [RFC 6817], that yields a list of size 'Current_Filter'. The initial and minimum congestion windows, 'Init_CWND' and 'Min_CWND', should both be 2. Regarding which of these parameters should be under control of an application, the possible range goes from exposing nothing on the one hand to considering everything that is not prescribed with a "MUST" in the specification as a parameter on the other hand. Function implementations are not provided as a parameter to any of the transport protocols discussed here; hence, we do not regard the Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 19 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 'Filter' function as a parameter. However, to avoid unnecessarily limiting future implementations, we consider all other parameters above as tunable parameters that should be exposed. 4. Pass 2 This pass categorizes the primitives from pass 1 based on whether they relate to a connection or to data transmission. Primitives are presented following the nomenclature "CATEGORY.[SUBCATEGORY].PRIMITIVENAME.PROTOCOL". The CATEGORY can be CONNECTION or DATA. Within the CONNECTION category, ESTABLISHMENT, AVAILABILITY, MAINTENANCE, and TERMINATION subcategories can be considered. The DATA category does not have any SUBCATEGORY. The PROTOCOL name "UDP(-Lite)" is used when primitives are equivalent for UDP and UDP-Lite; the PROTOCOL name "TCP" refers to both TCP and MPTCP. We present "connection" as a general protocol-independent concept and use it to refer to, e.g., TCP connections (identifiable by a unique pair of IP addresses and TCP port numbers), SCTP associations (identifiable by multiple IP address and port number pairs), as well UDP and UDP-Lite connections (identifiable by a unique socket pair). Some minor details are omitted for the sake of generalization -- e.g., SCTP's 'Close' [RFC 4960] returns success or failure and lets the application control whether further receive or send operations, or both, are disabled [RFC 6458]. This is not described in the same way for TCP [RFC 793], but these details play no significant role for the primitives provided by either TCP or SCTP (for the sake of being generic, it could be assumed that both receive and send operations are disabled in both cases). The TCP 'Send' and 'Receive' primitives include usage of an 'urgent' parameter. This parameter controls a mechanism that is required to implement the "synch signal" used by telnet [RFC 854], but [RFC 6093] states that "new applications SHOULD NOT employ the TCP urgent mechanism." Because pass 2 is meant as a basis for the creation of future systems, the "urgent" mechanism is excluded. This also concerns the notification 'Urgent Pointer Advance' in the 'Error_Report' (Section 4.2.4.1 of [RFC 1122]). Since LEDBAT is a congestion control mechanism and not a protocol, it is not currently defined when to enable/disable or configure the mechanism. For instance, it could be a one-time choice upon connection establishment or when listening for incoming connections, in which case it should be categorized under CONNECTION.ESTABLISHMENT or CONNECTION.AVAILABILITY, respectively. To avoid unnecessarily Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 20 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 limiting future implementations, it was decided to place it under CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE, with all parameters that are described in the specification [RFC 6817] made configurable. 4.1. CONNECTION-Related Primitives ESTABLISHMENT: Active creation of a connection from one transport endpoint to one or more transport endpoints. Interfaces to UDP and UDP-Lite allow both connection-oriented and connection-less usage of the API [RFC 8085]. o CONNECT.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Open' (active) or 'Open' (passive) with socket, followed by 'Send' Parameters: 1 local IP address (optional); 1 destination transport address (for active open; else the socket and the local IP address of the succeeding incoming connection request will be maintained); timeout (optional); options (optional); MKT configuration (optional); and user message (optional) Comments: if the local IP address is not provided, a default choice will automatically be made. The timeout can also be a retransmission count. The options are IP options to be used on all segments of the connection. At least the Source Route option is mandatory for TCP to provide. 'MKT configuration' refers to the ability to configure MKTs for authentication. The user message may be transmitted to the peer application immediately upon reception of the TCP SYN packet. To benefit from the lower latency this provides as part of the experimental TFO mechanism, its length must be at most the TCP's maximum segment size (minus TCP options used in the SYN). The message may also be delivered more than once to the application on the remote host. o CONNECT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Initialize', followed by 'Enable/Disable Interleaving' (optional), followed by 'Associate' Parameters: list of local SCTP port number / IP address pairs ('Initialize'); one or several sockets (identifying the peer); outbound stream count; maximum allowed inbound stream count; adaptation layer indication (optional); chunk types required to be authenticated (optional); request interleaving on/off; maximum Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 21 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 number of INIT attempts (optional); maximum init. RTO for INIT (optional); user message (optional); and remote UDP port number (optional) Returns: socket list or failure Comments: 'Initialize' needs to be called only once per list of local SCTP port number / IP address pairs. One socket will automatically be chosen; it can later be changed in MAINTENANCE. The user message may be transmitted to the peer application immediately upon reception of the packet containing the COOKIE-ECHO chunk. To benefit from the lower latency this provides, its length must be limited such that it fits into the packet containing the COOKIE-ECHO chunk. If a remote UDP port number is provided, SCTP packets will be encapsulated in UDP. o CONNECT.MPTCP: This is similar to CONNECT.TCP except for one additional boolean parameter that allows the ability to enable or disable MPTCP for a particular connection or socket (default: enabled). o CONNECT.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Connect' followed by 'Send' Parameters: 1 local IP address (default (ANY) or specified); 1 destination transport address; 1 local port (default (OS chooses) or specified); and 1 destination port (default (OS chooses) or specified). Comments: associates a transport address creating a UDP(-Lite) socket connection. This can be called again with a new transport address to create a new connection. The CONNECT function allows an application to receive errors from messages sent to a transport address. AVAILABILITY: Preparing to receive incoming connection requests. o LISTEN.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Open' (passive) Parameters: 1 local IP address (optional); 1 socket (optional); timeout (optional); buffer to receive a user message (optional); and MKT configuration (optional) Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 22 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Comments: if the socket and/or local IP address is provided, this waits for incoming connections from only and/or to only the provided address. Else this waits for incoming connections without this/these constraint(s). ESTABLISHMENT can later be performed with 'Send'. If a buffer is provided to receive a user message, a user message can be received from a TFO-enabled sender before the TCP's connection handshake is completed. This message may arrive multiple times. 'MKT configuration' refers to the ability to configure MKTs for authentication. o LISTEN.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Initialize', followed by the 'Communication Up' or 'Restart' notification and possibly the 'Adaptation Layer' notification Parameters: list of local SCTP port number / IP address pairs (initialize) Returns: socket list; outbound stream count; inbound stream count; adaptation layer indication; chunks required to be authenticated; and interleaving supported on both sides yes/no Comments: 'Initialize' needs to be called only once per list of local SCTP port number / IP address pairs. 'Communication Up' can also follow a 'Communication Lost' notification, indicating that the lost communication is restored. If the peer has provided an adaptation layer indication, an 'Adaptation Layer' notification is issued. o LISTEN.MPTCP: This is similar to LISTEN.TCP except for one additional boolean parameter that allows the ability to enable or disable MPTCP for a particular connection or socket (default: enabled). o LISTEN.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Receive' Parameters: 1 local IP address (default (ANY) or specified); 1 destination transport address; local port (default (OS chooses) or specified); and destination port (default (OS chooses) or specified) Comments: the 'Receive' function registers the application to listen for incoming UDP(-Lite) datagrams at an endpoint. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 23 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 MAINTENANCE: Adjustments made to an open connection, or notifications about it. These are out-of-band messages to the protocol that can be issued at any time, at least after a connection has been established and before it has been terminated (with one exception: CHANGE_TIMEOUT.TCP can only be issued for an open connection when DATA.SEND.TCP is called). In some cases, these primitives can also be immediately issued during ESTABLISHMENT or AVAILABILITY, without waiting for the connection to be opened (e.g., CHANGE_TIMEOUT.TCP can be done using TCP's 'Open' primitive). For UDP and UDP-Lite, these functions may establish a setting per connection but may also be changed per datagram message. o CHANGE_TIMEOUT.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Open' or 'Send' combined with unspecified control of per-connection state variables Parameters: timeout value (optional); adv_uto (optional); boolean uto_enabled (optional, default false); and boolean changeable (optional, default true) Comments: when sending data, an application can adjust the connection's timeout value (the time after which the connection will be aborted if data could not be delivered). If 'uto_enabled' is true, the 'timeout value' (or, if provided, the value 'adv_uto') will be advertised for the TCP on the other side of the connection to adapt its own user timeout accordingly. 'uto_enabled' controls whether the UTO option is enabled for a connection. This applies to both sending and receiving. 'changeable' controls whether the user timeout may be changed based on a UTO option received from the other end of the connection; it becomes false when the 'timeout value' is used. o CHANGE_TIMEOUT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Change Heartbeat' combined with 'Configure Max. Retransmissions of an Association' Parameters: 'Change Heartbeat': heartbeat frequency and 'Configure Max. Retransmissions of an Association': Association.Max.Retrans Comments: 'Change Heartbeat' can enable/disable heartbeats in SCTP as well as change their frequency. The parameter 'Association.Max.Retrans' defines after how many unsuccessful transmissions of any packets (including heartbeats) the Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 24 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 association will be terminated; thus, these two primitives/ parameters together can yield a similar behavior for SCTP associations as CHANGE_TIMEOUT.TCP does for TCP connections. o DISABLE_NAGLE.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Parameters: one boolean value Comments: the Nagle algorithm delays data transmission to increase the chance of sending a full-sized segment. An application must be able to disable this algorithm for a connection. o DISABLE_NAGLE.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Enable/Disable NoDelay' Parameters: one boolean value Comments: Nagle-like algorithms delay data transmission to increase the chance of sending a full-sized packet. o REQUEST_HEARTBEAT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Request Heartbeat' Parameters: socket Returns: success or failure Comments: requests an immediate heartbeat on a path, returning success or failure. o ADD_PATH.MPTCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Parameters: local IP address and optionally the local port number Comments: the application specifies the local IP address and port number that must be used for a new subflow. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 25 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o ADD_PATH.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Change Local Address / Set Peer Primary' Parameters: local IP address o REM_PATH.MPTCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Parameters: local IP address; local port number; remote IP address; and remote port number Comments: the application removes the subflow specified by the IP/ port-pair. The MPTCP implementation must trigger a removal of the subflow that belongs to this IP/port-pair. o REM_PATH.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Change Local Address / Set Peer Primary' Parameters: local IP address o SET_PRIMARY.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set Primary' Parameters: socket Returns: result of attempting this operation Comments: update the current primary address to be used, based on the set of available sockets of the association. o SET_PEER_PRIMARY.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Change Local Address / Set Peer Primary' Parameters: local IP address Comments: this is only advisory for the peer. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 26 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o CONFIG_SWITCHOVER.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Path Switchover' Parameters: primary max retrans (number of retransmissions after which a path is considered inactive) and PF max retrans (number of retransmissions after which a path is considered to be "Potentially Failed", and others will be preferably used) (optional) o STATUS.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Status', 'Enable/Disable Interleaving', and 'Network Status Change' notification Returns: data block with information about a specified association, containing: association connection state; destination transport address list; destination transport address reachability states; current local and peer receiver window sizes; current local congestion window sizes; number of unacknowledged DATA chunks; number of DATA chunks pending receipt; primary path; most recent SRTT on primary path; RTO on primary path; SRTT and RTO on other destination addresses; MTU per path; and interleaving supported yes/no Comments: the 'Network Status Change' notification informs the application about a socket becoming active/inactive; this only affects the programming style, as the same information is also available via 'Status'. o STATUS.MPTCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Returns: list of pairs of tuples of IP address and TCP port number of each subflow. The first of the pair is the local IP and port number, while the second is the remote IP and port number. o SET_DSCP.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Parameters: DSCP value Comments: this allows an application to change the DSCP value for outgoing segments. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 27 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o SET_DSCP.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set DSCP value' Parameters: DSCP value Comments: this allows an application to change the DSCP value for outgoing packets on a path. o SET_DSCP.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set_DSCP' Parameter: DSCP value Comments: this allows an application to change the DSCP value for outgoing UDP(-Lite) datagrams. [RFC 7657] and [RFC 8085] provide current guidance on using this value with UDP. o ERROR.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Error_Report' Returns: reason (encoding not specified) and subreason (encoding not specified) Comments: soft errors that can be ignored without harm by many applications; an application should be able to disable these notifications. The reported conditions include at least: ICMP error message arrived and excessive retransmissions. o ERROR.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Error_Report' Returns: Error report Comments: this returns soft errors that may be ignored without harm by many applications; an application must connect to be able receive these notifications. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 28 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o SET_AUTH.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Parameters: current_key and rnext_key Comments: current_key and rnext_key are the preferred outgoing MKT and the preferred incoming MKT, respectively, for a segment that is sent on the connection. o SET_AUTH.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set/Get Authentication Parameters' Parameters: key_id; key; and hmac_id o GET_AUTH.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified Parameters: current_key and rnext_key Comments: current_key and rnext_key are the preferred outgoing MKT and the preferred incoming MKT, respectively, that were carried on a recently received segment. o GET_AUTH.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set/Get Authentication Parameters' Parameters: key_id and chunk_list o RESET_STREAM.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Add/Reset Streams, Reset Association' Parameters: sid and direction o RESET_STREAM-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Stream Reset' notification Parameters: information about the result of RESET_STREAM.SCTP Comments: this is issued when the procedure for resetting streams has completed. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 29 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o RESET_ASSOC.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Add/Reset Streams, Reset Association' Parameters: information related to the extension, as defined in [RFC 3260] o RESET_ASSOC-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Association Reset' notification Parameters: information about the result of RESET_ASSOC.SCTP Comments: this is issued when the procedure for resetting an association has completed. o ADD_STREAM.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Add/Reset Streams, Reset Association' Parameters: number of outgoing and incoming streams to be added o ADD_STREAM-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Stream Change' notification Parameters: information about the result of ADD_STREAM.SCTP Comments: this is issued when the procedure for adding a stream has completed. o SET_STREAM_SCHEDULER.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set Stream Scheduler' Parameters: scheduler identifier Comments: choice of First-Come, First-Served; Round-Robin; Round- Robin per Packet; Priority-Based; Fair Bandwidth; and Weighted Fair Queuing. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 30 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o CONFIGURE_STREAM_SCHEDULER.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Stream Scheduler' Parameters: priority Comments: the priority value only applies when Priority-Based or Weighted Fair Queuing scheduling is chosen with SET_STREAM_SCHEDULER.SCTP. The meaning of the parameter differs between these two schedulers, but in both cases, it realizes some form of prioritization regarding how bandwidth is divided among streams. o SET_FLOWLABEL.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set IPv6 Flow Label' Parameters: flow label Comments: this allows an application to change the IPv6 header's flow label field for outgoing packets on a path. o AUTHENTICATION_NOTIFICATION-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Authentication' notification Returns: information regarding key management o CONFIG_SEND_BUFFER.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Send Buffer Size' Parameters: size value in octets o CONFIG_RECEIVE_BUFFER.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Receive Buffer Size' Parameters: size value in octets Comments: this controls the receiver window. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 31 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o CONFIG_FRAGMENTATION.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Message Fragmentation' Parameters: one boolean value (enable/disable) and maximum fragmentation size (optional; default: PMTU) Comments: if fragmentation is enabled, messages exceeding the maximum fragmentation size will be fragmented. If fragmentation is disabled, trying to send a message that exceeds the maximum fragmentation size will produce an error. o CONFIG_PMTUD.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Path MTU Discovery' Parameters: one boolean value (PMTUD on/off) and PMTU value (optional) Returns: PMTU value Comments: this returns a meaningful PMTU value when PMTUD is enabled (the boolean is true), and the PMTU value can be set if PMTUD is disabled (the boolean is false). o CONFIG_DELAYED_SACK.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure Delayed SACK Timer' Parameters: one boolean value (delayed SACK on/off); timer value (optional); and number of packets to wait for (default 2) Comments: if delayed SACK is enabled, SCTP will send a SACK either upon receiving the provided number of packets or when the timer expires, whatever occurs first. o CONFIG_RTO.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Configure RTO Calculation' Parameters: init (optional); min (optional); and max (optional) Comments: this adjusts the initial, minimum, and maximum RTO values. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 32 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o SET_COOKIE_LIFE.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set Cookie Life Value' Parameters: cookie life value o SET_MAX_BURST.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set Maximum Burst' Parameters: max burst value Comments: not all implementations allow values above the default of 4. o SET_PARTIAL_DELIVERY_POINT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set Partial Delivery Point' Parameters: partial delivery point (integer) Comments: this parameter must be smaller or equal to the socket receive buffer size. o SET_CHECKSUM_ENABLED.UDP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Checksum_Enabled' Parameters: 0 when zero checksum is used at sender, 1 for checksum at sender (default) o SET_CHECKSUM_REQUIRED.UDP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Require_Checksum' Parameter: 0 to allow zero checksum, 1 when a non-zero checksum is required (default) at the receiver o SET_CHECKSUM_COVERAGE.UDP-Lite: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set_Checksum_Coverage' Parameters: coverage length at sender (default maximum coverage) Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 33 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o SET_MIN_CHECKSUM_COVERAGE.UDP-Lite: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set_Min_Coverage' Parameter: coverage length at receiver (default minimum coverage) o SET_DF.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive event: 'Set_DF' Parameter: 0 when DF is not set (default) in the IPv4 header, 1 when DF is set o GET_MMS_S.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive event: 'Get_MM_S' Comments: this retrieves the maximum transport-message size that may be sent using a non-fragmented IP packet from the configured interface. o GET_MMS_R.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive event: 'Get_MMS_R' Comments: this retrieves the maximum transport-message size that may be received from the configured interface. o SET_TTL.UDP(-Lite) (IPV6_UNICAST_HOPS): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set_TTL' and 'Set_IPV6_Unicast_Hops' Parameters: IPv4 TTL value or IPv6 Hop Count value Comments: this allows an application to change the IPv4 TTL of IPv6 Hop Count value for outgoing UDP(-Lite) datagrams. o GET_TTL.UDP(-Lite) (IPV6_UNICAST_HOPS): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Get_TTL' and 'Get_IPV6_Unicast_Hops' Returns: IPv4 TTL value or IPv6 Hop Count value Comments: this allows an application to read the IPv4 TTL of the IPv6 Hop Count value from a received UDP(-Lite) datagram. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 34 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o SET_ECN.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set_ECN' Parameters: ECN value Comments: this allows a UDP(-Lite) application to set the Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) code point field for outgoing UDP(-Lite) datagrams. It defaults to sending '00'. o GET_ECN.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Get_ECN' Parameters: ECN value Comments: this allows a UDP(-Lite) application to read the ECN code point field from a received UDP(-Lite) datagram. o SET_IP_OPTIONS.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Set_IP_Options' Parameters: options Comments: this allows a UDP(-Lite) application to set IP options for outgoing UDP(-Lite) datagrams. These options can at least be the Source Route, Record Route, and Timestamp option. o GET_IP_OPTIONS.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Get_IP_Options' Returns: options Comments: this allows a UDP(-Lite) application to receive any IP options that are contained in a received UDP(-Lite) datagram. o CONFIGURE.LEDBAT: Pass 1 primitive/event: N/A Parameters: enable (boolean); target; allowed_increase; gain_inc; gain_dec; base_history; current_filter; init_cwnd; and min_cwnd Comments: 'enable' is a newly invented parameter that enables or disables the whole LEDBAT service. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 35 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 TERMINATION: Gracefully or forcefully closing a connection or being informed about this event happening. o CLOSE.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Close' Comments: this terminates the sending side of a connection after reliably delivering all remaining data. o CLOSE.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Shutdown' Comments: this terminates a connection after reliably delivering all remaining data. o ABORT.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Abort' Comments: this terminates a connection without delivering remaining data and sends an error message to the other side. o ABORT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Abort' Parameters: abort reason to be given to the peer (optional) Comments: this terminates a connection without delivering remaining data and sends an error message to the other side. o ABORT.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive event: 'Close' Comments: this terminates a connection without delivering remaining data. No further UDP(-Lite) datagrams are sent/received for this transport service instance. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 36 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o TIMEOUT.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'User Timeout' event Comments: the application is informed that the connection is aborted. This event is executed on expiration of the timeout set in CONNECTION.ESTABLISHMENT.CONNECT.TCP (possibly adjusted in CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.CHANGE_TIMEOUT.TCP). o TIMEOUT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Communication Lost' event Comments: the application is informed that the connection is aborted. This event is executed on expiration of the timeout that should be enabled by default (see the beginning of Section 8.3 in [RFC 4960]) and was possibly adjusted in CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.CHANGE_TIMEOOUT.SCTP. o ABORT-EVENT.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified o ABORT-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Communication Lost' event Returns: abort reason from the peer (if available) Comments: the application is informed that the other side has aborted the connection using CONNECTION.TERMINATION.ABORT.SCTP. o CLOSE-EVENT.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: not specified o CLOSE-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Shutdown Complete' event Comments: the application is informed that CONNECTION.TERMINATION.CLOSE.SCTP was successfully completed. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 37 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 4.2. DATA-Transfer-Related Primitives All primitives in this section refer to an existing connection, i.e., a connection that was either established or made available for receiving data (although this is optional for the primitives of UDP(-Lite)). In addition to the listed parameters, all sending primitives contain a reference to a data block, and all receiving primitives contain a reference to available buffer space for the data. Note that CONNECT.TCP and LISTEN.TCP in the ESTABLISHMENT and AVAILABILITY categories also allow to transfer data (an optional user message) before the connection is fully established. o SEND.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Send' Parameters: timeout (optional); current_key (optional); and rnext_key (optional) Comments: this gives TCP a data block for reliable transmission to the TCP on the other side of the connection. The timeout can be configured with this call (see also CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.CHANGE_TIMEOUT.TCP). 'current_key' and 'rnext_key' are authentication parameters that can be configured with this call (see also CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.SET_AUTH.TCP). o SEND.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Send' Parameters: stream number; context (optional); socket (optional); unordered flag (optional); no-bundle flag (optional); payload protocol-id (optional); pr-policy (optional) pr-value (optional); sack-immediately flag (optional); and key-id (optional) Comments: this gives SCTP a data block for transmission to the SCTP on the other side of the connection (SCTP association). The 'stream number' denotes the stream to be used. The 'context' number can later be used to refer to the correct message when an error is reported. The 'socket' can be used to state which path should be preferred, if there are multiple paths available (see also CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.SETPRIMARY.SCTP). The data block can be delivered out of order if the 'unordered' flag is set. The 'no-bundle flag' can be set to indicate a preference to avoid bundling. The 'payload protocol-id' is a number that will, if provided, be handed over to the receiving application. Using pr-policy and pr-value, the level of reliability can be controlled. The 'sack-immediately' flag can be used to indicate Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 38 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 that the peer should not delay the sending of a SACK corresponding to the provided user message. If specified, the provided key-id is used for authenticating the user message. o SEND.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Send' Parameters: IP address and port number of the destination endpoint (optional if connected) Comments: this provides a message for unreliable transmission using UDP(-Lite) to the specified transport address. The IP address and port number may be omitted for connected UDP(-Lite) sockets. All CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.SET_*.UDP(-Lite) primitives apply per message sent. o RECEIVE.TCP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Receive' Parameters: current_key (optional) and rnext_key (optional) Comments: 'current_key' and 'rnext_key' are authentication parameters that can be read with this call (see also CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.GET_AUTH.TCP). o RECEIVE.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Data Arrive' notification, followed by 'Receive' Parameters: stream number (optional) Returns: stream sequence number (optional) and partial flag (optional) Comments: if the 'stream number' is provided, the call to receive only receives data on one particular stream. If a partial message arrives, this is indicated by the 'partial flag', and then the 'stream sequence number' must be provided such that an application can restore the correct order of data blocks that comprise an entire message. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 39 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o RECEIVE.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Receive' Parameters: buffer for received datagram Comments: all CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE.GET_*.UDP(-Lite) primitives apply per message received. o SENDFAILURE-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Send Failure' notification, optionally followed by 'Receive Unsent Message' or 'Receive Unacknowledged Message' Returns: cause code; context; and unsent or unacknowledged message (optional) Comments: 'cause code' indicates the reason of the failure, and 'context' is the context number if such a number has been provided in DATA.SEND.SCTP, for later use with 'Receive Unsent Message' or 'Receive Unacknowledged Message', respectively. These primitives can be used to retrieve the unsent or unacknowledged message (or part of the message, in case a part was delivered) if desired. o SEND_FAILURE.UDP(-Lite): Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Send' Comments: this may be used to probe for the effective PMTU when using in combination with the 'MAINTENANCE.SET_DF' primitive. o SENDER_DRY-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Sender Dry' notification Comments: this informs the application that the stack has no more user data to send. o PARTIAL_DELIVERY_ABORTED-EVENT.SCTP: Pass 1 primitive/event: 'Partial Delivery Aborted' notification Comments: this informs the receiver of a partial message that the further delivery of the message has been aborted. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 40 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 5. Pass 3 This section presents the superset of all transport features in all protocols that were discussed in the preceding sections, based on the list of primitives in pass 2 but also on text in pass 1 to include transport features that can be configured in one protocol and are static properties in another (congestion control, for example). Again, some minor details are omitted for the sake of generalization -- e.g., TCP may provide various different IP options, but only source route is mandatory to implement, and this detail is not visible in the pass 3 transport feature "Specify IP options". As before, "UDP(-Lite)" represents both UDP and UDP-Lite, and "TCP" refers to both TCP and MPTCP. 5.1. CONNECTION-Related Transport Features ESTABLISHMENT: Active creation of a connection from one transport endpoint to one or more transport endpoints. o Connect Protocols: TCP, SCTP, and UDP(-Lite) o Specify which IP options must always be used Protocols: TCP and UDP(-Lite) o Request multiple streams Protocols: SCTP o Limit the number of inbound streams Protocols: SCTP o Specify number of attempts and/or timeout for the first establishment message Protocols: TCP and SCTP o Obtain multiple sockets Protocols: SCTP o Disable MPTCP Protocols: MPTCP Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 41 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o Configure authentication Protocols: TCP and SCTP Comments: with TCP, this allows the configuration of MKTs. In SCTP, this allows the specification of which chunk types must always be authenticated. DATA, ACK, etc., are different 'chunks' in SCTP; one or more chunks may be included in a single packet. o Indicate an Adaptation Layer (via an adaptation code point) Protocols: SCTP o Request to negotiate interleaving of user messages Protocols: SCTP o Hand over a message to reliably transfer (possibly multiple times) before connection establishment Protocols: TCP o Hand over a message to reliably transfer during connection establishment Protocols: SCTP o Enable UDP encapsulation with a specified remote UDP port number Protocols: SCTP AVAILABILITY: Preparing to receive incoming connection requests. o Listen, 1 specified local interface Protocols: TCP, SCTP, and UDP(-Lite) o Listen, N specified local interfaces Protocols: SCTP o Listen, all local interfaces Protocols: TCP, SCTP, and UDP(-Lite) o Obtain requested number of streams Protocols: SCTP o Limit the number of inbound streams Protocols: SCTP o Specify which IP options must always be used Protocols: TCP and UDP(-Lite) Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 42 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o Disable MPTCP Protocols: MPTCP o Configure authentication Protocols: TCP and SCTP Comments: with TCP, this allows the configuration of MKTs. In SCTP, this allows the specification of which chunk types must always be authenticated. DATA, ACK, etc., are different 'chunks' in SCTP; one or more chunks may be included in a single packet. o Indicate an Adaptation Layer (via an adaptation code point) Protocols: SCTP MAINTENANCE: Adjustments made to an open connection, or notifications about it. o Change timeout for aborting connection (using retransmit limit or time value) Protocols: TCP and SCTP o Suggest timeout to the peer Protocols: TCP o Disable Nagle algorithm Protocols: TCP and SCTP o Request an immediate heartbeat, returning success/failure Protocols: SCTP o Notification of excessive retransmissions (early warning below abortion threshold) Protocols: TCP o Add path Protocols: MPTCP and SCTP MPTCP Parameters: source-IP; source-Port; destination-IP; and destination-Port SCTP Parameters: local IP address o Remove path Protocols: MPTCP and SCTP MPTCP Parameters: source-IP; source-Port; destination-IP; and destination-Port SCTP Parameters: local IP address Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 43 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o Set primary path Protocols: SCTP o Suggest primary path to the peer Protocols: SCTP o Configure Path Switchover Protocols: SCTP o Obtain status (query or notification) Protocols: SCTP and MPTCP SCTP parameters: association connection state; destination transport address list; destination transport address reachability states; current local and peer receiver window sizes; current local congestion window sizes; number of unacknowledged DATA chunks; number of DATA chunks pending receipt; primary path; most recent SRTT on primary path; RTO on primary path; SRTT and RTO on other destination addresses; MTU per path; and interleaving supported yes/no MPTCP parameters: subflow-list (identified by source-IP; source-Port; destination-IP; and destination-Port) o Specify DSCP field Protocols: TCP, SCTP, and UDP(-Lite) o Notification of ICMP error message arrival Protocols: TCP and UDP(-Lite) o Change authentication parameters Protocols: TCP and SCTP o Obtain authentication information Protocols: TCP and SCTP o Reset Stream Protocols: SCTP o Notification of Stream Reset Protocols: STCP o Reset Association Protocols: SCTP o Notification of Association Reset Protocols: STCP o Add Streams Protocols: SCTP Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 44 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o Notification of Added Stream Protocols: STCP o Choose a scheduler to operate between streams of an association Protocols: SCTP o Configure priority or weight for a scheduler Protocols: SCTP o Specify IPv6 flow label field Protocols: SCTP o Configure send buffer size Protocols: SCTP o Configure receive buffer (and rwnd) size Protocols: SCTP o Configure message fragmentation Protocols: SCTP o Configure PMTUD Protocols: SCTP o Configure delayed SACK timer Protocols: SCTP o Set Cookie life value Protocols: SCTP o Set maximum burst Protocols: SCTP o Configure size where messages are broken up for partial delivery Protocols: SCTP o Disable checksum when sending Protocols: UDP o Disable checksum requirement when receiving Protocols: UDP o Specify checksum coverage used by the sender Protocols: UDP-Lite o Specify minimum checksum coverage required by receiver Protocols: UDP-Lite Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 45 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o Specify DF field Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Get max. transport-message size that may be sent using a non- fragmented IP packet from the configured interface Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Get max. transport-message size that may be received from the configured interface Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Specify TTL/Hop Count field Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Obtain TTL/Hop Count field Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Specify ECN field Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Obtain ECN field Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Specify IP options Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Obtain IP options Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Enable and configure "Low Extra Delay Background Transfer" Protocols: A protocol implementing the LEDBAT congestion control mechanism TERMINATION: Gracefully or forcefully closing a connection, or being informed about this event happening. o Close after reliably delivering all remaining data, causing an event informing the application on the other side Protocols: TCP and SCTP Comments: a TCP endpoint locally only closes the connection for sending; it may still receive data afterwards. o Abort without delivering remaining data, causing an event that informs the application on the other side Protocols: TCP and SCTP Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 46 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Comments: in SCTP, a reason can optionally be given by the application on the aborting side, which can then be received by the application on the other side. o Abort without delivering remaining data, not causing an event that informs the application on the other side Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Timeout event when data could not be delivered for too long Protocols: TCP and SCTP Comments: the timeout is configured with CONNECTION.MAINTENANCE "Change timeout for aborting connection (using retransmit limit or time value)". 5.2. DATA-Transfer-Related Transport Features All transport features in this section refer to an existing connection, i.e., a connection that was either established or made available for receiving data. Note that TCP allows the transfer of data (a single optional user message, possibly arriving multiple times) before the connection is fully established. Reliable data transfer entails delay -- e.g., for the sender to wait until it can transmit data or due to retransmission in case of packet loss. 5.2.1. Sending Data All transport features in this section are provided by DATA.SEND from pass 2. DATA.SEND is given a data block from the application, which here we call a "message" if the beginning and end of the data block can be identified at the receiver, and "data" otherwise. o Reliably transfer data, with congestion control Protocols: TCP o Reliably transfer a message, with congestion control Protocols: SCTP o Unreliably transfer a message, with congestion control Protocols: SCTP o Unreliably transfer a message, without congestion control Protocols: UDP(-Lite) o Configurable Message Reliability Protocols: SCTP Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 47 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 o Choice of stream Protocols: SCTP o Choice of path (destination address) Protocols: SCTP o Ordered message delivery (potentially slower than unordered) Protocols: SCTP o Unordered message delivery (potentially faster than ordered) Protocols: SCTP and UDP(-Lite) o Request not to bundle messages Protocols: SCTP o Specifying a 'payload protocol-id' (handed over as such by the receiver) Protocols: SCTP o Specifying a key identifier to be used to authenticate a message Protocols: SCTP o Request not to delay the acknowledgement (SACK) of a message Protocols: SCTP 5.2.2. Receiving Data All transport features in this section are provided by DATA.RECEIVE from pass 2. DATA.RECEIVE fills a buffer provided by the application, with what here we call a "message" if the beginning and end of the data block can be identified at the receiver, and "data" otherwise. o Receive data (with no message delimiting) Protocols: TCP o Receive a message Protocols: SCTP and UDP(-Lite) o Choice of stream to receive from Protocols: SCTP o Information about partial message arrival Protocols: SCTP Comments: in SCTP, partial messages are combined with a stream sequence number so that the application can restore the correct order of data blocks an entire message consists of. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 48 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 5.2.3. Errors This section describes sending failures that are associated with a specific call to DATA.SEND from pass 2. o Notification of an unsent (part of a) message Protocols: SCTP and UDP(-Lite) o Notification of an unacknowledged (part of a) message Protocols: SCTP o Notification that the stack has no more user data to send Protocols: SCTP o Notification to a receiver that a partial message delivery has been aborted Protocols: SCTP 6. IANA Considerations This document does not require any IANA actions. 7. Security Considerations Authentication, confidentiality protection, and integrity protection are identified as transport features [RFC 8095]. These transport features are generally provided by a protocol or layer on top of the transport protocol; none of the transport protocols considered in this document provides these transport features on its own. Therefore, these transport features are not considered in this document, with the exception of native authentication capabilities of TCP and SCTP for which the security considerations in [RFC 5925] and [RFC 4895] apply. Security considerations for the use of UDP and UDP-Lite are provided in the referenced RFCs. Security guidance for application usage is provided in the UDP Guidelines [RFC 8085]. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 49 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 8. References 8.1. Normative References [RFC 793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, DOI 10.17487/RFC 793, September 1981, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 793>. [RFC 1122] Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, DOI 10.17487/RFC 1122, October 1989, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 1122>. [RFC 3758] Stewart, R., Ramalho, M., Xie, Q., Tuexen, M., and P. Conrad, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Partial Reliability Extension", RFC 3758, DOI 10.17487/RFC 3758, May 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 3758>. [RFC 4895] Tuexen, M., Stewart, R., Lei, P., and E. Rescorla, "Authenticated Chunks for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)", RFC 4895, DOI 10.17487/RFC 4895, August 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 4895>. [RFC 4960] Stewart, R., Ed., "Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 4960, DOI 10.17487/RFC 4960, September 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 4960>. [RFC 5061] Stewart, R., Xie, Q., Tuexen, M., Maruyama, S., and M. Kozuka, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Dynamic Address Reconfiguration", RFC 5061, DOI 10.17487/RFC 5061, September 2007, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 5061>. [RFC 5482] Eggert, L. and F. Gont, "TCP User Timeout Option", RFC 5482, DOI 10.17487/RFC 5482, March 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 5482>. [RFC 5925] Touch, J., Mankin, A., and R. Bonica, "The TCP Authentication Option", RFC 5925, DOI 10.17487/RFC 5925, June 2010, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 5925>. [RFC 6182] Ford, A., Raiciu, C., Handley, M., Barre, S., and J. Iyengar, "Architectural Guidelines for Multipath TCP Development", RFC 6182, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6182, March 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6182>. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 50 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 [RFC 6458] Stewart, R., Tuexen, M., Poon, K., Lei, P., and V. Yasevich, "Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)", RFC 6458, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6458, December 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6458>. [RFC 6525] Stewart, R., Tuexen, M., and P. Lei, "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration", RFC 6525, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6525, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6525>. [RFC 6817] Shalunov, S., Hazel, G., Iyengar, J., and M. Kuehlewind, "Low Extra Delay Background Transport (LEDBAT)", RFC 6817, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6817, December 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6817>. [RFC 6824] Ford, A., Raiciu, C., Handley, M., and O. Bonaventure, "TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses", RFC 6824, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6824, January 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6824>. [RFC 6897] Scharf, M. and A. Ford, "Multipath TCP (MPTCP) Application Interface Considerations", RFC 6897, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6897, March 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6897>. [RFC 6951] Tuexen, M. and R. Stewart, "UDP Encapsulation of Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Packets for End-Host to End-Host Communication", RFC 6951, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6951, May 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6951>. [RFC 7053] Tuexen, M., Ruengeler, I., and R. Stewart, "SACK- IMMEDIATELY Extension for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 7053, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7053, November 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7053>. [RFC 7413] Cheng, Y., Chu, J., Radhakrishnan, S., and A. Jain, "TCP Fast Open", RFC 7413, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7413, December 2014, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7413>. [RFC 7496] Tuexen, M., Seggelmann, R., Stewart, R., and S. Loreto, "Additional Policies for the Partially Reliable Stream Control Transmission Protocol Extension", RFC 7496, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7496, April 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7496>. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 51 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 [RFC 7829] Nishida, Y., Natarajan, P., Caro, A., Amer, P., and K. Nielsen, "SCTP-PF: A Quick Failover Algorithm for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 7829, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7829, April 2016, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7829>. [RFC 8085] Eggert, L., Fairhurst, G., and G. Shepherd, "UDP Usage Guidelines", BCP 145, RFC 8085, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8085, March 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8085>. [RFC 8260] Stewart, R., Tuexen, M., Loreto, S., and R. Seggelmann, "Stream Schedulers and User Message Interleaving for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol", RFC 8260, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8260, November 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8260>. [RFC 8304] Fairhurst, G. and T. Jones, "Transport Features of the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Lightweight UDP (UDP- Lite)", RFC 8304, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8304, February 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8304>. 8.2. Informative References [RFC 854] Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification", STD 8, RFC 854, DOI 10.17487/RFC 854, May 1983, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 854>. [RFC 2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC 2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2119>. [RFC 2474] Nichols, K., Blake, S., Baker, F., and D. Black, "Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers", RFC 2474, DOI 10.17487/RFC 2474, December 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2474>. [RFC 2475] Blake, S., Black, D., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., and W. Weiss, "An Architecture for Differentiated Services", RFC 2475, DOI 10.17487/RFC 2475, December 1998, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 2475>. [RFC 3260] Grossman, D., "New Terminology and Clarifications for Diffserv", RFC 3260, DOI 10.17487/RFC 3260, April 2002, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 3260>. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 52 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 [RFC 5461] Gont, F., "TCP's Reaction to Soft Errors", RFC 5461, DOI 10.17487/RFC 5461, February 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 5461>. [RFC 6093] Gont, F. and A. Yourtchenko, "On the Implementation of the TCP Urgent Mechanism", RFC 6093, DOI 10.17487/RFC 6093, January 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 6093>. [RFC 7414] Duke, M., Braden, R., Eddy, W., Blanton, E., and A. Zimmermann, "A Roadmap for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Specification Documents", RFC 7414, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7414, February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7414>. [RFC 7657] Black, D., Ed. and P. Jones, "Differentiated Services (Diffserv) and Real-Time Communication", RFC 7657, DOI 10.17487/RFC 7657, November 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 7657>. [RFC 8095] Fairhurst, G., Ed., Trammell, B., Ed., and M. Kuehlewind, Ed., "Services Provided by IETF Transport Protocols and Congestion Control Mechanisms", RFC 8095, DOI 10.17487/RFC 8095, March 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/RFC 8095>. [TAPS-MINSET] Welzl, M. and S. Gjessing, "A Minimal Set of Transport Services for TAPS Systems", Work in Progress, draft-ietf- taps-minset-01, February 2018. Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 53 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 Appendix A. Overview of RFCs Used as Input for Pass 1 TCP: [RFC 793], [RFC 1122], [RFC 5482], [RFC 5925], and [RFC 7413]. MPTCP: [RFC 6182], [RFC 6824], and [RFC 6897]. SCTP: RFCs without a sockets API specification: [RFC 3758], [RFC 4895], [RFC 4960], and [RFC 5061]. RFCs that include a sockets API specification: [RFC 6458], [RFC 6525], [RFC 6951], [RFC 7053], [RFC 7496], and [RFC 7829]. UDP(-Lite): See [RFC 8304]. LEDBAT: [RFC 6817]. Appendix B. How This Document Was Developed This section gives an overview of the method that was used to develop this document. It was given to contributors for guidance, and it can be helpful for future updates or extensions. This document is only concerned with transport features that are explicitly exposed to applications via primitives. It also strictly follows RFC text: if a transport feature is truly relevant for an application, the RFCs should say so, and they should describe how to use and configure it. Thus, the approach followed for developing this document was to identify the right RFCs, then analyze and process their text. Primitives that "MAY" be implemented by a transport protocol were excluded. To be included, the minimum requirement level for a primitive to be implemented by a protocol was "SHOULD". Where style requirement levels as described in [RFC 2119] are not used, primitives were excluded when they are described in conjunction with statements like, e.g., "some implementations also provide" or "an implementation may also". Excluded primitives or parameters were briefly described in a dedicated subsection. Pass 1: This began by identifying text that talks about primitives. An API specification, abstract or not, obviously describes primitives -- but we are not *only* interested in API specifications. The text describing the 'Send' primitive in the API specified in [RFC 793], Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 54 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 for instance, does not say that data transfer is reliable. TCP's reliability is clear, however, from this text in Section 1 of [RFC 793]: The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) is intended for use as a highly reliable host-to-host protocol between hosts in packet- switched computer communication networks, and in interconnected systems of such networks. Some text for the pass 1 subsections was developed by copying and pasting all the relevant text parts from the relevant RFCs then adjusting the terminology to match that in Section 2 and shortening phrasing to match the general style of the document. An effort was made to formulate everything as a primitive description such that the primitive descriptions became as complete as possible (e.g., the 'SEND.TCP' primitive in pass 2 is explicitly described as reliably transferring data); text that is relevant for the primitives presented in this pass but still does not fit directly under any primitive was used in a subsection's introduction. Pass 2: The main goal of this pass is unification of primitives. As input, only text from pass 1 was used (no exterior sources). The list in pass 2 is not arranged by protocol (i.e., "first protocol X, here are all the primitives; then protocol Y, here are all the primitives, ...") but by primitive (i.e., "primitive A, implemented this way in protocol X, this way in protocol Y, ..."). It was a goal to obtain as many similar pass 2 primitives as possible. For instance, this was sometimes achieved by not always maintaining a 1:1 mapping between pass 1 and pass 2 primitives, renaming primitives, etc. For every new primitive, the already-existing primitives were considered to try to make them as coherent as possible. For each primitive, the following style was used: o PRIMITIVENAME.PROTOCOL: Pass 1 primitive/event: Parameters: Returns: Comments: The entries "Parameters", "Returns", and "Comments" were skipped when a primitive had no parameters, no described return value, or no comments seemed necessary, respectively. Optional parameters are followed by "(optional)". When known, default values were provided. Pass 3: The main point of this pass is to identify transport features that are the result of static properties of protocols, for which all protocols have to be listed together; this is then the final list of Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 55 top

RFC 8303 Transport Services February 2018 all available transport features. This list was primarily based on text from pass 2, with additional input from pass 1 (but no external sources). Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank (in alphabetical order) Bob Briscoe, Spencer Dawkins, Aaron Falk, David Hayes, Karen Nielsen, Tommy Pauly, Joe Touch, and Brian Trammell for providing valuable feedback on this document. We especially thank Christoph Paasch for providing input related to Multipath TCP and Gorry Fairhurst and Tom Jones for providing input related to UDP(-Lite). This work has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 644334 (NEAT). Authors' Addresses Michael Welzl University of Oslo PO Box 1080 Blindern Oslo N-0316 Norway Email: michawe@ifi.uio.no Michael Tuexen Muenster University of Applied Sciences Stegerwaldstrasse 39 Steinfurt 48565 Germany Email: tuexen@fh-muenster.de Naeem Khademi University of Oslo PO Box 1080 Blindern Oslo N-0316 Norway Email: naeemk@ifi.uio.no Welzl, et al. Informational PAGE 56 top

RFC TOTAL SIZE: 117774 bytes PUBLICATION DATE: Thursday, February 8th, 2018 LEGAL RIGHTS: The IETF Trust (see BCP 78)


RFC-ARCHIVE.ORG

© RFC 8303: The IETF Trust, Thursday, February 8th, 2018
© the RFC Archive, 2024, RFC-Archive.org
Maintainer: J. Tunnissen

Privacy Statement